Molecules 2018, 23, 2413
3 of 10
of reaction time were originally applied (as listed in Table 1). In the beginning, NHC precursors
L1 L6 with different backbone and wingtip substituents were prepared (entries 1–6, Table 1). The first
–
and foremost, 62% of amide 3a and 15% of imine 4a, were obtained with 18% of 1a remaining if L1
was used (entry 1). Electron-deficient precursor L2 gave rise to lower amide content in the product
distribution, demonstrating its disadvantage for amide formation (entry 2 vs. entry 1). In the case
of an electron-rich NHC precursor (L3), a similar result was obtained compared with L1 (entry 3 vs.
entry 1). Moreover, the substituents on the N-terminus of the NHC precursors were adjusted (entries 1,
4–6). With retaining Me as the substituent for one N-terminus, different groups including Et, nPr,
and iPr were introduced for the other terminus. The result was indicative that Et was the optimized
group for this reaction (entry 4 vs. entries 1, 5, and 6). After establishing the ideal NHC precursor (L4),
we continued the optimization by screening other reaction conditions. It was found that the catalyst
generation time was crucial for the catalysis (entries 4, 7–11); 57% of the amide product could be
detected if every substance was added simultaneously (entry 5). As we elongated the period for the in
situ catalyst generation from 0 h to 2.0 h, the yields of 3a gradually increased (entries 4, 7–10). A further
increment of the time led to a similar yield (entry 11 vs. entry 10). Therefore, the ideal duration for the
catalyst generation was finalized as 2 h. Next, the ratio of [Ru]: L4:NaH was varied (entries 12–17). It is
worth emphasizing that the amount of both L4 and NaH changed so as to ascertain three additional
equivalents of NaH to activate [RuCl2(cod)]n for all cases. Without L4, no amide was formed (entry
12). As the ratio increased from 1:0:3 to 1:5:8, gradually higher yields of 3a were observed (entries 10,
12–16). However, a higher ratio prompted a reduced yield of 3a (entry 17 vs. entry 16). Thus, the ratio
of 1:5:8 was recognized as the best one (entry 16), and further increasing the reaction time from 16 h to
36 h produced 3a in 93% yield (entry 18).
In order to identify a more active catalytic system, a reduced Ru loading of 0.25 mol.% was
attempted (as listed in Table 2). At the outset, 65% of 3a was afforded if the loading of the
above-optimized catalytic system was directly reduced to 0.25 mol.% (entry 1). In addition, different
bases including potassium bis(trimethylsilyl)amide (KHMDS), KOtBu, and Cs2CO3 were exploited
instead of NaH (entries 2–4). Interestingly, compared with NaH, the milder Cs2CO3 led to an increased
yield of 3a (entry 4 vs. entry 1). It was also noticed that the volume of toluene was crucial for the
reaction (entries 4–8). Either a more concentrated or diluted solution triggered a lower amide/imine
selectivity (entry 5–8 vs. entry 4). Furthermore, the adjustment of the base amounts influenced the
reaction (entries 4, 9–12), and 1.75 mol.% of Cs2CO3 was found to be optimal for the selective amide
formation (entry 10). Therefore, the optimized reaction conditions were identified as
(5.50 mmol), [RuCl2(cod)]n (0.0125 mmol), L4 (0.0625 mmol), Cs2CO3 (0.075 mmol), toluene (1.50 mL),
reflux, and 36 h unless otherwise noted.
With the optimized reaction conditions at hand, the substrate scope and limitations of this strategy
were further investigated (as depicted in Figure 2). For the sterically non-hindered substrates (1a 1e)
1 (5.00 mmol),
2
–
,
the corresponding amides could be obtained in good to excellent yields. If a secondary amine (1f) was
employed, tertiary amide 3f was also given in 80% yield with 0.5 mol.% of [Ru]. Expectedly, lactam
3g was efficiently afforded from amino alcohol 1f in an intramolecular pattern. On the other hand,
the reactions of benzyl alcohol with substituted benzylamines were evaluated. It seemed that these
substituents had no obvious influence on the reactivity, and amides 3h
yields. In the case of coupling benzylamine with various benzyl alcohols, a substituent at either the
para or meta position resulted in good yields of amides 3l 3n. However, an ortho group gave amide
–3k were synthesized in 75–85%
–
3o in a moderate yield. Apparently, aromatic amines were less reactive, and aniline (2p) produced
amide 3p in only 25% yield. To our delight, this newly developed catalytic system was not as sensitive
to steric bulks as our previous systems [58
,59]. With an Ru loading of 0.5 mol.%, several sterically
hindered substrates could be efficiently transformed into amides 3q–3t.