3
712
J. Chen et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 52 (2011) 3710–3713
optimized reaction conditions. After careful optimization of the
reaction conditions it was found that prolonging the reaction time
to 24 h resulted in comparable catalytic abilities when aryl bro-
mides were used instead of aryl iodides. Thus, a variety of substi-
tuted aryl bromides were then examined, and the results are
shown in Table 3.
reactivity with aqueous ammonia as shown in the preparation of
2-methoxylaniline (Table 3, entry 7). Remarkably, 1 and 2-bro-
mo-naphthalene also proved to be good substrates in the reaction,
giving the corresponding naphthol in good yields (Table 3, entries
13 and 14). It must be pointed out that the reaction of aryl chlo-
rides was not efficient under the present system.
It was observed that aryl bromides bearing electron-withdraw-
ing or electron-donating groups were viable substrates, most of the
substrates afforded good to excellent yields. Furthermore, reac-
tions of bromide bearing ortho-substituent exhibited still high
3
. Conclusions
In conclusion, we have discovered a simple and environment-
friendly and economical method for transforming aryl iodides
and bromides into aniline derivatives in one step. A wide range
of aryl iodides and aryl bromides were found to be applicable to
the catalytic system. The present procedure is mild and tolerant
of a variety of functional groups, thus allowing for the practical
new route to primary aryl amines. The convenience of aqueous
ammonia, and low cost of the ligand-free catalytic copper system
makes this method readily adaptable to production on an indus-
trial scale, where safety and environmental factors are of particular
concern. Further application of the CuI/PEG-400 catalytic system is
currently under investigation in our laboratory.
Table 3
CuI-catalyzed coupling of amination of bromides with aqueous ammonia in PEG-400
CuI(10%mol)
Na PO (1.0equiv)
3
4
Ar
Br + NH
3
(aq)
NH2
Ar
PEG/H O(2:1)
2
1
00°C, 24h
Entrya
Aryl halide
Product
Yieldb (%)
1
2
Br
NH2
93
88
4. Experimental section
Br
Br
Br
Br
NH2
NH2
Br
Cl
NH2
4
.1. Typical procedure for the catalysis
Cl
3
4
81
89
3 4
CuI (0.05 mmol), aryl halide (0.5 mmol), Na PO (0.5 mmol),
2
5–28% aqueous ammonia (1 mL), and PEG-400 (2 mL) were added
Cl
Br
Cl
to a sealed tube. The reaction mixture was stirred at 100 °C (aryl
iodides for 15 h and aryl bromides for 24 h) and then cooled to
room temperature and extracted with diethyl ether (3 times).
The combined organic phase was then dried with anhydrous
NH2
5
78
F
F
2 4
Na SO and the solvent was removed under reduced pressure.
The remaining residue was purified by column chromatography
on silica gel to provide the desired aryl amines.
6
7
F
Br
F
NH
2
77
76
Br
NH2
NH2
OMe
OMe
OMe
OMe
Acknowledgments
Br
This project was sponsored by the Jiangxi Provincial Natural
Science Foundation (No 2010GQH0064), We also thank the Analy-
sis and Testing Center of Jiangxi Normal University for NMR
measurements.
8
9
80
83
87
90
86
MeO
Br
Br
Br
MeO
NH2
NH
2
References and notes
1
.
.
Negwar, M. In: Organic-Chemical Drugs and their Synonyms: An International
Survey, seventh ed.; Akademie: Berlin, Germany, 1994.
Recent reviews of palladium-catalyzed C–N coupling reactions: (a) Surry, D. S.;
Buchwald, S. L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 6338; (b) Hartwig, J. F. Acc. Chem.
Res. 2008, 41, 1534.
1
1
1
0
1
2
2
CH3
Br
CH3
NH2
H C
H C
NH
2
3
3
3. Reviews of copper-catalyzed C–N coupling reactions: (a) Ley, S. V.; Thomas, A.
W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 5400; (b) Deng, W.; Liu, L.; Guo, Q.-X. Chin. J.
Org. Chem. 2004, 24, 150; (c) Ma, D.; Cai, Q. Acc. Chem. Res. 2008, 41, 1450; (d)
Monnier, F.; Taillefer, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 3096; (e) Evano, G.;
Blanchard, N.; Toumi, M. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 3054; (f) Monnier, F.; Taillefer,
M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 6954.
H
3
C
CH
3
H C
CH3
3
4.
5.
6.
7.
(a) Lang, F.; Zewge, D.; Houpis, I. N.; Volante, R. P. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42,
3251; (b) Willis, M. C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 3402.
(a) Ullmann, F. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 1903, 36, 2382; (b) Lindley, J. Tetrahedron
Br
NH2
1
1
3
4
78
75
1984, 40, 1433; (c) Goldberg, I. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 1906, 39, 1619.
(a) Shen, Q.; Hartwig, J. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 10028; (b) Surry, D. S.;
Buchwald, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 103.
(a) Wu, X. F.; Darcel, C. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 4753; (b) Xia, N.; Taillefer, M.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 337; (c) Wu, H.; Wolf, C. Chem. Commun. 2009,
Br
NH2
3
035; (d) Kim, J.; Chang, S. Chem. Commun. 2008, 3052; (e) Wang, D.; Cai, Q.;
a
Ding, K. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2009, 351, 1722; (f) Yang, C. T.; Fu, Y.; Huang, Y. B.; Yi,
J.; Guo, Q. X.; Liu, L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 7398; (g) Jiang, L.; Lu, X.;
Zhang, H.; Jiang, Y.; Ma, D. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 4542.
Unless otherwise noted, the reactions were carried out with aryl bromides
0.5 mmol), 25–28% aqueous ammonia (1 mL), CuI (0.05 mmol), Na PO (0.5 mmol)
(
3
4
in PEG-400 (2 mL) at 100 °C,24 h.
b
8. Wu, Z. Q.; Jiang, Z. Q.; Wu, D.; Xiang, H. F.; Zhou, X. G. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2010,
854.
Isolated yield.
1