In addition, we wish to report the unambiguous identifica-
tion of a κ2-P,S binding mode of BINAP(S) on Pd based on
an X-ray crystallographic study.
Our investigation into the Pd/(S)-BINAP(S)-catalyzed
allylic amination was initiated using the ethyl carbonate of
1,3-diphenylallyl alcohol 2. The results are summarized in
Table 1. Primary amines benzylamine and allylamine (entries
when using chiral racemic substrates in the Pd-catalyzed
allylic substitution reaction.
Phthalimide derivative 3e (a precursor to primary amines)
was produced in high ee, but unfortunately the reaction with
sodium p-toluenesulfonamide did not proceed even after
prolonged reaction times.
Having established that this system allowed reaction with
a range of amines, the reaction scope with respect to different
allylic substrates (Table 2) was examined. We were pleased
Table 1. Allylic Amination of 2 with Various Aminesa
Table 2. Allylic Amination of Various Substrates with
Benzylaminea
conversionb
(%)
eec
(%)
abs
configd
entry amine T (°C)
t (h)
1
2
a
b
c
c
d
d
e
f
-25
-25
-25
-25
-25
-25
rt
24
24
0.5
16
0.5
16
21
48
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
0
95 (-)-(R)
94 (-)
3
55 (-)-(R)
89 (-)-(R)
75 (-)-(R)
90 (-)-(R)
97 (-)-(R)
N/A N/A
4e
5
6e
7
%
ee
abs
8
rt
entry substrate T (°C) t (h) conversionb b/cb,c (%) configf
a For general experimental procedure, see the Supporting Information.
b Determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy of the quenched crude reaction
mixture. c Determined by 1H NMR chiral shift experiments using (-)-MTPA
as shift reagent. d Assigned by comparison of sign of optical rotation with
published values. e Performed at 5× dilution.
1
2
3
4
5
6
4a
5a
6a
7a
8a
9a
-25
-25
-25
-25
-25
rt
22
22
22
18
22
22
99
99
99
99
99
99
N/A 87d (-)-(S)
93:7 44d (+)-(S)
6:94 45d (+)-(S)
0:100 N/A N/A
91:9 N/A N/A
N/A 13e (-)-(S)
a For general experimental procedure, see the Supporting Information.
b Determined by1H NMR spectroscopy of the quenched crude reaction
mixture. c Note that 5b ) 6c which are the branched products. d Determined
by 1H NMR chiral shift experiments using (-)-MTPA as shift reagent.
e Determined by HPLC. f Assigned by comparison of sign of optical rotation
with published values.
1 and 2) reacted smoothly under our optimized conditions
to produce allylic amines 3a and 3b with excellent enanti-
oselectivity. Under the same conditions, the use of the
secondary amines morpholine and piperidine (entries 3 and
5) led to diminished enantioselectivities.
Interestingly, upon dilution of the overall reaction con-
centration by a factor of 5 (entries 4 and 6), products 3c and
3d were obtained in comparable enantiomeric excesses as
their primary amine counterparts.
to find that sterically less demanding substrate 4a was
aminated in 87% ee; this represents a significant improve-
ment over the previous best result (73%) for this substrate.3
Unsymmetrically substituted substrates 5a, 6a, and 7a
allowed us to examine the regioselectivity of this catalytic
system along with its enantioselectivity. In accordance with
our previous studies, regioisomeric substrates 5a and 6a were
preferentially substituted in the more-substituted position to
yield branched products with moderate ee. Even the doubly
substituted terminus of the 3-methylbut-2-en-1-yl ester 8a
was aminated with 91% regioselectivity. This obserVed
regioselectiVity is the reVerse of that found for most Pd
systems,2 which give predominantly linear substitution
products. This is in contrast to metals such as Ir,7,10,11,21 Rh,6,22
Mo,23 and Ru,24 which favor the branched substitution
These results can be rationalized in terms of a memory
effect,3,17-20 i.e., an incomplete scrambling of stereochemical
information of the initially formed Pd-π-allyl intermediate.
Presumably, nucleophilic attack on the Pd-π-allyl intermedi-
ate is a second-order process, whereas the Pd-π-allyl
diastereomeric equilibration is a first-order process. There-
fore, by diluting the reaction mixture, nucleophilic attack
should be slowed with respect to Pd-π-allyl diastereomeric
equilibration. This allows for the establishment of the
Curtin-Hammett conditions necessary to produce high ee’s
(17) Lloyd-Jones, G. C.; Stephen, S. C. Chem. Eur. J. 1998, 4, 2539-
2549.
(18) Fairlamb, I. J. S.; Lloyd-Jones, G. C.; Stepan, V.; Kocovsky, P.
Chem. Eur. J. 2002, 8, 4443-4453.
(19) Lloyd-Jones, G. C.; Stephen, S. C.; Murray, M.; Butts, C. P.;
Vyskocil, S.; Kocovsky, P. Chem. Eur. J. 2000, 6, 4348-4357.
(20) Faller, J. W.; Sarantopoulos, N. Organometallics 2004, 23, 2179-
2185.
(21) Takeuchi, R.; Ue, N.; Tanabe, K.; Yamashita, K.; Shiga, N. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 9525-9534.
(22) Evans, P. A.; Robinson, J. E.; Nelson, J. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999,
121, 12214-12214.
(23) Belda, O.; Moberg, C. Acc. Chem. Res. 2004, 37, 159-167.
634
Org. Lett., Vol. 7, No. 4, 2005