Fig. 2 The reaction time profile of N2 formation in the photocatalytic
decomposition of NO on the Cr-HMS catalyst at 273 K (2.0 wt% as Cr)
under UV light irradiation (a) l > 270 nm and visible light irradiation (b)
at l > 450 nm.
Fig. 3 The distribution of the photo-formed products in the photocatalytic
oxidation of propane with O2 on the Cr-HMS catalyst at 273 K (2.0 wt% as
Cr) under UV light irradiation (l > 270 nm) for (a) 0.5 h and (b) 2 h, and
visible light irradiation (l > 450 nm) for (c) 2 h.
UV light irradiation (l > 270 nm) of the Cr-HMS in the
presence of NO in the gas phase at 275 K led to the
photocatalytic decomposition of NO and the evolution of N2,
N2O and O2. The Cr-HMS also showed photocatalytic reactivity
even under visible light irradiation (l > 450 nm). As shown in
Fig. 2, the N2 yields increase linearly with the irradiation time.
The reaction stopped immediately when irradiation was ceased.
Formation of these reaction products was not detected under
dark conditions, or from irradiation of the HMS itself without
Cr-oxide. After prolonged irradiation, the amount of decom-
posed NO to form N2 per total number of Cr ions included
within the catalyst exceeded unity [after 96 h on the Cr-HMS
(0.02 wt% as Cr)]. These results clearly indicate that the
presence of both Cr-oxide species (included within the HMS) as
well as light irradiation are indispensable for the photocatalytic
reaction to take place and that the direct decomposition of NO
to produce N2, O2 and N2O occurs photocatalytically on the Cr-
HMS. Although the reaction rate under visible light irradiation
is less than under UV light irradiation, the selectivity for N2
formation (97%) under visible light irradiation is higher than
that of UV light irradiation (45%). These results indicate that
Cr-HMS can absorb visible light and act as an efficient
photocatalyst under not only UV light but also visible light
irradiation, and especially, Cr-HMS can be useful to form N2
under visible light irradiation.
The addition of NO to the Cr-HMS led to an efficient
quenching of the photoluminescence spectrum of the catalyst,
its extent depending upon the amount of NO added. These
results indicate that the charge transfer excited state of the
tetrahedrally coordinated isolated Cr-oxide moieties, (Cr5+–
O2)*, easily interact with NO, and this photo-excited species
plays an important role in the photocatalytic reaction under UV
and visible light irradiation.
On the other hand, light irradiation of the Cr-HMS in the
presence of propane and O2 led to the photocatalytic oxidation
of propane. As shown in Fig. 3, partial oxidation of propane
with a high selectivity for the production of oxygen-containing
hydrocarbons such as acetone and acrolein proceeds under
visible light irradiation, while further oxidation proceeds
mainly under UV light irradiation to produce CO2 and CO. The
selectivity of partial oxidation production under visible light
irradiation observed at 12% propane conversion is higher than
that observed under UV light irradiation at 26% conversion and
even under UV light irradiation for the shorter reaction time
with 11% conversion. These results indicate that the tetra-
hedrally coordinated, isolated Cr-oxide moieties in HMS can
exhibit an efficient photocatalytic reactivity for the oxidation of
propane under visible light irradiation with a high selectivity for
the partial oxidation of propane.
The present results have clearly demonstrated that the Cr-
HMS can absorb visible light and act as an efficient and
selective photocatalyst under visible light irradiation. This
photocatalytic system with tetrahedrally coordinated Cr-oxide
moieties dispersed on mesoporous silica seems to be a good
candidate for the conversion of abundant visible or solar light
energy into useful chemical energy.
Notes and references
1 L. Marchese, E. Gianotti, V. Dellarocca, T. Maschmeyer, F. Rey, S.
Coluccia and J. M. Thomas, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 1999, 1, 585; J.
Dédécék and B. Wichterlova, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 1999, 1, 629;
A. Corma, Chem. Rev., 1997, 97, 2373; B. Notari, Adv. Catal., 1996, 41,
253.
2 M. Anpo and M. Che, Adv. Catal., 1999, 44, 119; H. Yamashita, J.
Zhang, M. Matsuoka and M. Anpo, in Photofunctional Zeolites, ed. M.
Anpo, Nova Sci. Pub. Inc., New York, 2000, p. 129.
3 H. Yamashita, Y. Ichihashi, M. Anpo, M. Hashimoto, C. Louis and M.
Che, J. Phys. Chem., 1996, 100, 16 041; M. Anpo, H. Yamashita, Y.
Ichihashi, Y. Fujii and M. Honda, J. Phys. Chem. B, 1997, 101, 2632.
4 M. Anpo, S. G. Zhang, S. Higashimoto, M. Matsuoka, H. Yamashita, Y.
Ichihashi, Y. Matsumura and Y. Souma, J. Phys. Chem. B, 1999, 103,
9295.
5 S. Higashimoto, R. Tsumura, S. G. Zhang, M. Matsuoka, H. Yamashita,
C. Louis, M. Che and M. Anpo, Chem. Lett., 2000, 408.
6 H. Yamashita, M. Ariyuki, S. Higashimoto, S. G. Zhang, J. S. Chang,
S. E. Park, J. M. Lee, Y. Matsumura and M. Anpo, J. Synchrotron
Radiat., 1999, 6, 453.
7 W. Zhang, P. T. Tanev and T. J. Pinnavaia, Chem. Commun., 1996,
979.
8 D. Wei, N. Yao and G. L. Haller, Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal., 1999, 121,
239.
9 B. M. Weckhuysen, R. A. Schoonheydt, J. M. Jehng, I. E. Wachs, S. J.
Cho, R. Ryoo and E. Poels, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans., 1995, 91,
3245; Z. D. Zhu, Z. X. Chang and L. Kevan, J. Phys. Chem. B, 1999,
103, 2680.
10 B. M. Weckhuysen, A. A. Verberckmoes, A. L. Buttiens and R. A.
Schoonheydt, J. Phys. Chem. B, 1994, 98, 579.
11 M. Anpo, I. Takahashi and Y. Kubokawa, J. Phys. Chem., 1982, 86, 1;
M. F. Hazenkamp and G. Blasse, J. Phys. Chem., 1992, 96, 3442.
436
Chem. Commun., 2001, 435–436