Full Papers
applying a simple impregnation method and a low-cost salt
precursor. Herein, we based our study on the classical method-
acquisition. Phases were quantified by the Rietveld refinement
method using TOPAS® 4.2 software. The occupancy and temper-
ature factors of all atoms were fixed, and the unit cell parameters,
scale factor and atomic positions (except for special positions: 0,
1/4, 1/3, 1/2 etc.) were refined. Sample displacement, zero error and
intensity corrections were refined as well. The background was
fitted using a fifth-order Chebyshev polynomial function. Funda-
mental parameters profile fitting (FPPF) was used for the peak
profile refinements. For the [10 V]Si-ITQ-6 sample, a split-type
pseudo-Voigt (SPV) peak was used for modelling the amorphous
profile generated in the diffraction pattern due to structural
disorder. Diffuse reflectance UV-vis spectra were obtained in the
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
[58]
ology for synthesis of these supports, however recent studies
have been developed to simplify the exfoliation methods in
[59–64]
lamellar zeolitic structures,
providing a good perspective
on expanding the application of these materials in catalytic
processes.
Experimental Section
Synthesis of the lamellar precursor (Si-PreFER). Approximately
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
À 1
range from 190 to 800 cm , using a dual-beam PerkinElmer
Lambda 1050 UV/Vis/NIR spectrophotometer equipped with an
integrating sphere. The reflectance was converted using the
Kubelka-Munk equation and was plotted as a function of the
wavelength. In addition to the catalysts, the UV-Vis spectrum of
6
0 g of an aqueous solution containing 1.0 g of hydrofluoric acid
(Sigma-Aldrich, 48 wt.% in H O, purity >99.9%), 7.5 g of
2
ammonium fluoride (Sigma-Aldrich, purity >98.0%), 19.8 g of 4-
amino-2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine (TMPP, TCI Chemicals, purity
2
vanadium pentoxide (V O ), prepared from calcination of VOSO ,
>
98.0%) and 7.8 g of fumed silica (Sigma-Aldrich, 200 m /g) was
2
5
4
was recorded for reference. X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS)
measurements were recorded at the V K-edge, in transmission
mode, at the XAFS1 beamline of Brazilian Synchrotron Light
Laboratory (LNLS). For vanadium analyses, the XAFS1 beamline was
equipped with a Si(111) monochromator, operated in Bragg mode,
for selection of the desired range of X-ray wavelengths. The
monochromator was calibrated by setting the first inflection point
at the K-edge spectrum of the corresponding metallic foil standard
prepared and kept under stirring for 3 h at 30°C. The molar
composition was: 25 SiO : 10 HF: 40 NH F: 25 TMPP: 250 H O. After
2
4
2
preparation and stirring, the solution was heat treated in a
stainless-steel autoclave at 150°C for 120 h. The solid product was
separated by filtration, washed with distilled water and dried at
8
0°C for 24 h. Preparation of supports. The microporous 3D
support, Si-FER, was prepared by calcination of Si-PreFER in air at
620°C for 6 h. A micro/mesoporous 2D support, Si-ITQ-6, was
prepared by refluxing a solution containing 190 g of distilled water,
approximately 10 g of Si-PreFER, 55 g of hexadecyltrimeth-
ylammonium bromide (Sigma-Aldrich, purity �98.0%), and 120 g
of tetrapropylammonium hydroxide (Sigma-Aldrich, 1.0 mol/L in
(5465 eV for vanadium). The powdered samples, diluted with boron
nitride, were pressed into wafers whose thickness was chosen so
that the normalized absorption jump at the edge was close to 1.
Analysis of the XAS data employed Athena and Artemis graphical
interface software, using three merged spectra to improve the
H O) at 80°C for 22 h. The resulting suspension was placed in an
2
signal-to-noise ratio. To fit the EXAFS data, the initial values of E ,
ultrasonic bath at 50°C for 2 h, and concentrated hydrochloric acid
(Sigma-Aldrich, 36.5–38.0 wt.%) was then added to the solution,
until it reached pH 2, to re-precipitate the layered material. The
solid product was separated by filtration, washed with distilled
water, dried at 80°C for 24 h, and calcined in air at 620°C for 6 h.
0
2
used for k-scaling, and S , the amplitude reduction factor, were
0
2
obtained by fitting the EXAFS results for the crystalline V O5
reference, with the number of nearest neighbor atoms (CN) and
their distance (R) fixed at their expected crystallographic values.
2
The obtained E and S values were used for modelling the EXAFS
0
0
Preparation of impregnated catalysts. The [nV]Si-FER and [nV]Si-
ITQ-6 catalysts (where n stands for 1, 5, or 10 wt.% of vanadium)
were prepared by the wet impregnation method. Typically, 1 g of
the support was added to a solution containing 50 mL of distilled
water and vanadium(IV) oxide sulfate hydrate (Sigma-Aldrich, purity
signals of impregnated catalysts. Nitrogen physisorption isotherms
of supports were performed on a MicrotracBEL BELSORP-max
instrument at liquid nitrogen temperature (196 C), with a relative
°
À 6
pressure P/P0 interval between 1×10 and 0.997. Prior to the
measurements, the samples were evacuated on a BELPREP-vac II at
200°C for 12 h. Nitrogen physisorption isotherms of vanadium
oxide supported catalysts were performed on a Micromeritics
Tristar II instrument at liquid nitrogen temperature (196 C), with a
97%, VOSO ×4H O), followed by rotary evaporation at 60°C under
4
2
vacuum until complete dryness. The samples were then calcined in
air at 500°C for 6 h. The quantity of VOSO in solution varied
4
°
À 3
according to the final wt.% of vanadium in the catalyst. A reference
sample of bulk vanadium pentoxide (V O ) was prepared from
relative pressure interval of between 1×10 and 0.998. Prior to the
2
5
measurements, the samples were evacuated at 200 C for 12 h.
Micropore volumes of all samples were determined by using the t-
plot method. Mesopore volumes were determined by difference
°
calcination of VOSO in air at 500°C for 6 h.
4
Ex situ characterization of catalysts. The vanadium content in the
catalysts was determined by Inductively Coupled Plasma-Optical
Emission Spectrometry (ICP-OES) of digested samples using an
Optima 8000 spectrometer. Acid digestion was performed by
suspending 100 mg of sample in 1 mL of distilled water, followed
by the addition of 0.1 mL of sulfuric acid (Sigma-Aldrich, nominally
between total pore volume at P/P =0.95 and the micropore
0
volumes. Pore size distributions were determined by applying the
Barrett-Joyner-Halenda (BJH) method. Transmission electron micro-
graph (TEM) images were obtained on a FEI Tecnai F30 at 300 kV.
The samples were suspended in ethanol and dispersed over a holey
carbon film grid for subsequent imaging. Temperature-pro-
grammed reduction (TPR) profiles were recorded in a Micromeritics
AutoChem II 2920. Approximately 50 mg of sample was placed on a
small bed of quartz wool in a quartz U-tube. The catalyst was
pretreated under a flow of 20 mL/min of He at 200°C for 2 h, and
9
4
1
5–98% H SO ) and 1 mL of hydrofluoric acid (Sigma-Aldrich,
2 4
8 wt.% in H O, purity >99.9%). The suspension was heated to
2
00°C during 2 h, and the resulting volume was diluted in 100 mL
of deionized water. X-ray diffraction patterns were obtained at the
XPD beamline of the Brazilian Synchrotron Light Laboratory (LNLS).
The XPD beamline was equipped with a Huber 4+2 circle
diffractometer and a Eulerian cradle (model 513) positioned ca.
then cooled to 50°C. After pretreatment, 20 mL/min of 10% H /Ar
2
was flown through the U-tube, and the sample was heated up to
7
00°C at 5°C/min. The outlet gas passed through a trap, kept
1
3 m from
a double-bounce Si (111) monochromator (λ=
cooled with acetone/liquid nitrogen, and the H consumption was
recorded by a thermal conductivity detector. Finally, the reduction
2
0.1377 nm). The data were collected in high resolution mode,
employing a Si(111) analyzer crystal and a Mythen detector. The
measurements were performed at room temperature, in the
2θ range from 7 to 40°, with, approximately, 8 min for each
profile of the reference V
O was recorded under the same
2
5
conditions applied to the supported catalysts.
ChemCatChem 2019, 11, 1–12
9
© 2019 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
��
These are not the final page numbers!