Please do not adjust margins
Catalysis Science & Technology
Page 5 of 6
DOI: 10.1039/C5CY00600G
ARTICLE
Journal Name
shown in Figure 4. In the case of cyclohexane, intense bands
attributed to CH2 stretching of adsorbed cyclohexane were
observed at 3000ꢀ2800 cmꢀ1 with a weak CH2 deformation band
at around 1450 cmꢀ1. The adsorption of cyclohexane is in
equilibrium with gaseous molecules, since the adsorbed
cyclohexane was completely removed by evacuation. The top
spectrum in Figure 4, indicating the change of adsorbed
species, is only explained for simplicity. The decrease of CH2
stretching bands in intensity due to the decrease of the amount
of cyclohexane is clear in the spectrum in addition to negative
bands of d3ꢀmethoxy species. In the light of the recovery of the
acidic sites, they appeared as OD groups and the acidic OH
band at 3610 cmꢀ1 was silent; d3ꢀmehotxy species reacted in
CD2 units with cyclohexane leaving one of their D atoms on the
acid sites similarly to the case of the reaction with light
olefins.17 Since only 13Cꢀlabelled methanol was used as a
methylation agent of cyclohexane for NMR analysis11 so far,
this new information has been found for the first time by using
d3ꢀmehotxy species for IR analysis.
be noted that the activation energy of methylation of
cyclohexane with methoxy species is similar to that of ethene
(111 ± 4 kJ·molꢀ1). While ethene, propene and cyclohexane
form CꢀC bond with methoxy species through the same
mechanism (carbeneꢀlike intermediate), the reactivity of
propene was much higher than those of the others, with the
activation energy of 41 ± 1 kJ·molꢀ1 (unpublished data). This
indicates that the rate determining step for the CꢀC bond
formation of hydrocarbons with methoxy species through
carbeneꢀlike mechanism cannot be simply attributed to the CꢀH
bond cleavage of methoxy species. Therefore, it is further
implied that the role of the reactant hydrocarbon for the CꢀH
bond activation of methoxy species is significant in the
activated complex.
The reaction mechanisms of methoxy species with benzene
and cyclohexane are compared by illustration in Figure 5.
Benzene substitutes a H atom with more electrophilic (cationic)
methyl groups to generate CD3ꢀtoluene probably using two sites
17
(Scheme A), similarly to reactions of amines11,
and
dimethyleter.18 This is in analogous to soꢀcalled carbenium
cation route, where CD3 groups in d3ꢀmethoxy species are
maintained. On the other hand, the same methoxy species form
CꢀC bonds with cyclohexane to evolve methylcyclohexane
(C6H11ꢀCHD2) and OD groups through carbeneꢀlike
intermediate most likely in a concerted manner (Scheme B). In
the case of cyclohexene (cyclic olefin), the reaction followed
Scheme B leaving OD groups from d3ꢀmethoxy species,
Conclusions
Different mechanisms operate for reactions of methoxy species
to form CꢀC bonds with various hydrocarbons: in methyl
cationꢀlike (Figure 5 Scheme A) and carbeneꢀlike (Figure 5
Scheme B) mechanisms, most probably both in concerted
manner. While the hydrocarbon pool intermediates and their
reactions inside the cageꢀtype pores of zeolites should be the
major processes of MTO reaction, the details of elementary
pathways of WTO reaction would be also of importance. The
mechanism of activation and the reactivity of methoxy species,
one of the elementary intermediates, are markedly affected by
the interaction with reactant molecules.
Notes and references
1
Song, W.; Fu, H.; Haw, J. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2001, 123,
4749-4754.
because cyclohexene is less electroꢀdonative than benzene.
The rate of the reaction was measured by using the increase
of recovery of the integrated peak intensity of the acidic OH
band in the time course. The reaction of methoxy species with
both benzene and cyclohexane followed first order kinetics with
respect to gas phase pressure of the reactants and the amount of
methoxy species on HꢀZSMꢀ5. The activation energies were
estimated form 473 to 523 K to be 54 ± 4 and 115 ± 3 kJ·molꢀ1
for benzene and cyclohexane, respectively (Figure 6). It should
2
Svelle, S.; Joensen, F.; Nerlov, J.; Olsbye, U.; Lillerud, K.-P.;
Kolboe, S.; Bjørgen, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006, 128, 14770-
14771.
Bjørgen, M.; Joensen, F.; Lillerud, K.-P.; Olsbye, U.; Svelle, S.
Catal. Today, 2009, 142, 90-97.
Stöcker, M. Microp. Mesop. Mater., 1999, 29, 3-48.
Bjørgen, M.; Svelle, S.; Joensen, F.; Nerlov, J.; Kolboe, S.;
Bonino, F.; Palumbo, L.; Bordiga, S.; Olsbye, U. J. Catal., 2007,
249, 195-207.
3
4
5
6
Dahl, I.; Kolboe, S. J. Catal., 1994, 149, 458-464.
4 | J. Name., 2012, 00, 1-3
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx
Please do not adjust margins