The Journal of Organic Chemistry
Note
Reaction progress was determined for reactions run below pH 9 by
monitoring phenol production at 280 nm (ε280 = 1418 Abs/M/cm).
Phenoxide production was monitored at 290 nm for higher pH
reactions, and an effective ε290 was determined under the exact
experimental conditions in these cases. Observed first-order rate
constants were calculated by a nonlinear least-squares fitting of the
absorbance versus time data to a standard first-order exponential
equation. Good first-order behavior was generally observed for greater
than three half-lives, and a comparison of the UV spectra before and
after complete hydrolysis demonstrated a 1:1 stoichiometry in all
cases. A rate constant for the hydrolysis of 1 at pH 5.9 and 25 °C was
determined by the method of initial rates. N,N-Dimethyl O-phenyl
sulfamate (2) was prepared as described and characterized by 1H
NMR.19 Hydrolysis of 2 (17 mM) in H2O was carried out in vacuum-
sealed quartz tubes containing 0.2 M potassium phosphate buffer at
pH 5.9. The sealed quartz tubes were inserted into stainless steel pipe
bombs and placed in thermally equilibrated ovens as described.20
Reaction progress was measured by diluting the reaction samples 5-
fold with D2O and then obtaining a 1H NMR spectrum on the
reaction mixture and integrating the signals corresponding to
PhOSO2NMe2 to PhOH. Control experiments reveal that hydrolysis
of 2 at pH 5.9 is independent of hydronium ion concentration and that
the spontaneous reaction extends up to at least pH 8.
(6) Spilane, W. J.; Thea, S.; Cevasco, G.; Hynes, M. J.; McCaw, C. J.
A.; Maguire, N. P. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2011, 9, 523.
(7) Spillane, W. J.; McCaw, C. J. A.; Maguire, N. P. Tetrahedron Lett.
2008, 49, 1049.
(8) Spillane, W. J.; Malaubier, J.-B. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010, 51, 2059.
(9) Shi, F.-Q.; Li, X.; Xia, Y.; Zhang, L.; Yu, Z.-X. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2007, 129, 15503.
(10) An alternative and equally valid viewpoint would be that a small
amount of positive charge is lost from the aryloxy leaving group as the
sulfamate progresses from ground state to transition state.
(11) (a) Kirby, A. J.; Vargolis, A. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1967, 89, 415.
(b) Grzyska, P. K.; Czyryca, P. G.; Purcell, J.; Hengge, A. C. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 13106.
(12) (a) Hoff, R.; Larsen, P.; Hengge, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123,
9338. (b) Edwards, D. R.; Lohman, D. C.; Wolfenden, R. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2012, 125, 525.
(13) Rate constants for hydrolysis of ArOSO2NH2 at 37 °C were
calculated from the activation parameters reported in ref 7.
(14) A similar but less extensive plot appears in ref 16.
(15) (a) Guthrie, J. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102, 5177. (b) Thea,
S.; Guanti, G.; Hopkins, A. R.; Williams, A. J. Org. Chem. 1985, 50,
5592.
(16) Davy, M. B.; Douglas, K. T.; Loran, J. S.; Steltner, A.; Williams,
A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1977, 99, 1196.
(17) (a) Woo, L. W. L.; Ganeshapillai, D.; Thomas, M. P.; Sutcliffe,
O. B.; Malini, B.; Mahon, M. F.; Purohit, A.; Potter, B. V. L
ChemMedChem 2011, 6, 2019. (b) Howarth, N. M.; Purohit, A.; Reed,
M. J.; Potter, B. V. L J. Med. Chem. 1994, 37, 219.
(18) Wolfbeis, O. S.; Fuerlinger, E.; Kroneis, H.; Marsoner, H.
Fresenius Z. Anal. Chem. 1983, 314, 119.
(19) Spillane, W. J.; Taheny, A. P.; Kearns, M. M. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 1 1982, 677.
(20) Wolfenden, R. Chem. Rev. 2006, 106, 3379.
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
■
S
* Supporting Information
Plot of absorbance versus pH for the UV−vis titration of 1.
Eyring plots for the hydrolysis of 1 and 2. Plot of observed rate
constant versus percent deuterium content used to calculate the
solvent kinetic isotope effect on 1 (Figure S4). Table of kinetic
constants for the hydrolysis of ArOSO2X− (Table S1). This
material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://
AUTHOR INFORMATION
■
Corresponding Author
Notes
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
■
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grant No. GM-18325.
REFERENCES
■
(1) (a) Maltais, R.; Poirier, D. Steroids 2011, 76, 929. (b) Day, J. M.;
Purohit, A.; Foster, P. A.; Woo, L. W.; Potter, B. V.; Reed, M. J. Ann.
N.Y. Acad. Sci. 2009, 1155, 80.
́
(2) Bojarova, P.; Denehy, E.; Walker, I.; Loft, K.; DeSouza, D. P.;
Woo, L. W. L.; Potter, B. V. L; McConville, M. J.; Williams, S. J.
ChemBioChem 2008, 9, 613.
(3) For an example of a complex pH rate profile for the hydrolysis of
a sulfamate ester see: Thea, S.; Cevasco, G.; Guanti, G.; Williams, A. J.
Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1986, 1582.
(4) Willams, A.; Douglas, K. T. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2 1974,
1727.
(5) We do not specify a mechanism for the spontaneous hydrolysis of
2 and consider that it could occur by S−O bond cleavage with direct
displacement of phenol. An alternative process involving hydrolysis of
2 via S−N bond fission to initially afford phenyl sulfate and
dimethylamine (or its ammonium ion) cannot be ruled out based
on the kinetic data because of the subsequent hydrolysis of phenyl
sulfate (ΔH⧧ = 32.9 kcal/mol ΔS⧧ −15 cal/mol/K, data from ref 12b)
to form phenol and inorganic sulfate is predicted to occur faster than
its formation.
4453
dx.doi.org/10.1021/jo300386u | J. Org. Chem. 2012, 77, 4450−4453