Green Chemistry
Paper
difference to the varying cation densities on the low
index planes. In the absence of Ru, they demonstrated through
kinetic fitting that the rate limiting step for reduction was the
interaction between a H atom adsorbed on the surface and a
surface O atom. They proposed that a possible explanation
could be due to a limited quantity of adsorbed H atoms on the
surface. The addition of Ru shifted this step to a non rate-limit-
ing step, shifting the limiting step of the reduction to the rate
of defect healing from the bulk. It was proposed that a possi-
ble role of the Ru is to supply more H atoms to the surface via
spillover. In the case of guaiacol conversion, however, it is con-
ceivable that one of the oxygen atoms in guaiacol heals the
defects on the surface at a more rapid rate and shifts the rate-
3 A. V. Bridgwater and G. V. C. Peacocke, Renewable Sustain-
able Energy Rev., 2000, 4(1), 1–73.
4 D. C. Elliott, D. Beckman, A. V. Bridgwater, J. P. Diebold,
S. B. Gevert and Y. Solantausta, Energy Fuels, 1991, 5,
399.
5 A. V. Bridgwater, Chem. Eng. J., 2003, 91(2–3), 87–102.
6 A. V. Bridgwater, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis, 1999, 51, 3–22.
7 A. V. Bridgwater, Therm. Sci., 2004, 8, 21–49.
8 D. L. Klass, Biomass for Renewable Energy, Fuels and Chemi-
cals, Academic Press, San Diego, 1998.
9 A. A. C. M. Beenackers and W. P. M. Swaaij, in Thermo-
chemical Processing of Biomass, ed. A. V. Bridgwater, Butter-
worths, London, U.K., 1984.
limiting step back to hydrogen spillover and migration across 10 J. J. Hos and M. J. Groeneveld, in Biomass, ed. D. O. Hall
the surface.
It is proposed that the difference in rates per TiO
and R. P. Overend, Wiley and Sons, Chichester, U.K., 1987.
surface 11 J. M. Moffatt and R. P. Overend, Biomass, 1985, 7, 99.
2
area and per exposed Ru surface area observed between 12 T. P. Vispute, H. Zhang, A. Sanna, R. Xiao and G. W. Huber,
RuTi400 and RuTiP400 can be explained by the roles played by Science, 2010, 330, 1222–1227.
defects in the TiO during guaiacol deoxygenation to form phe- 13 G. W. Huber, S. Iborra and A. Corma, Chem. Rev., 2006,
nolics. The rutile phase of TiO has been shown to have more 106, 4044–4098.
surface defects compared to the anatase phase as discussed 14 S. Czernik and A. V. Bridgwater, Energy Fuels, 2004, 18,
above. It can therefore be envisioned that more defects, 590–598.
2
2
created by a greater ability of Ru to spillover hydrogen on P25, 15 A. Oasmaa and S. Czernik, Energy Fuels, 1999, 13, 914–921.
could be generated on RuTiP400, which could explain the 16 G. V. C. Peacocke, P. A. Russel, J. D. Jenkins and
higher rates per total surface area.
A. V. Bridgwater, Biomass Bioenergy, 1994, 7, 169–178.
7 S. Wan, T. Pham, S. Zhang, L. Lobban, D. Resasco and
R. Mallinson, AIChE J., 2013, 59, 7.
8 S. Boonyasuwat, T. Omotoso, D. E. Resasco and
S. P. Crossley, Catal. Lett., 2013, 143, 783–791.
1
1
Conclusions
It has been shown that the titania support phase plays an 19 E. P. Maris and R. J. Davis, J. Catal., 2007, 328–337.
important role in preventing agglomeration of ruthenium 20 D. C. Elliott and T. R. Hart, Energy Fuels, 2009, 23, 631.
species under oxidizing conditions. While the size of the 21 J. Wildschut, F. H. Mahfud, R. H. Venderbosch and
Ru particles on pure anatase supported Ru/TiO
largely affected by increases in calcination temperature, it was 22 R. I. Bickley, T. Gonzalez-Carreno, J. S. Lees, L. Palmisano
proposed that these particles were stabilized by the rutile and R. J. D. Tilley, J. Solid State Chem., 1991, 92, 178–190.
phase of the P25 support during calcination and this led to 23 V. Puddu, H. Choi, D. D. Dionysiou and G. L. Puma, Appl.
similar particle sizes upon calcination at higher temperatures. Catal., B, 2010, 94, 211.
This results in the potential for enhanced stability after catalyst 24 G. Busca and G. Ramis, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans., 1994,
regeneration. Furthermore, by comparing the guaiacol conver- 90(20), 3181–3190.
sion rates normalized to the surface area of the metal and the 25 N. Wetchakun, B. Incessungvorn, K. Wetchakun and
support, it was concluded that hydrogen spillover to produce S. Phanichphant, Mater. Lett., 2012, 82, 195.
oxygen vacancies is the primary mechanism for the enhanced 26 T. Sreethawong, Y. Suzuki and S. Yoshikawa, J. Solid State
2
was
H. J. Heeres, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2009, 48, 10324–10334.
guaiacol conversion over Ru/TiO
2
catalysts.
Chem., 2005, 178, 329.
2
2
7 D. Li, N. Ichikuni, S. Shimazu and T. Uematsu, Appl. Catal.,
A: General, 1999, 180, 227–235.
8 A. Bossi, F. Barbassi, A. Orlandi, G. Petrini and
L. Zanderighi, Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal., 1979, 3, 405.
Acknowledgements
Financial support from the National Science Foundation 29 T. Sreethawong, Y. Suzuki and S. Yoshikawa, J. Solid State
EPSCOR (0814361) is gratefully acknowledged.
Chem., 2005, 178, 329–338.
3
3
0 C. N. R. Rao, Can. J. Chem., 1961, 39, 498.
1 A. W. Czanderna, C. N. R. Rao and J. M. Honig, Trans.
Faraday Soc., 1958, 54, 1069.
References
32 E. F. Huer and C. W. Werss, Am. Mineral., 1972, 57, 10–23.
1
D. Mohan, C. U. P. Pittman Jr. and P. H. Steele, Energy 33 R. I. Bickley, T. Gonzalez-Carreno, J. S. Lees, L. Palmisano
Fuels, 2006, 20, 848–889.
and R. J. D. Tilley, J. Solid State Chem., 1991, 92, 178–
2
M. Stocker, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2008, 47, 9200–9211.
190.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014
Green Chem., 2014, 16, 645–652 | 651