Formation and Thermolysis of an Azo-Bridged Tricyclic Ring System
FULL PAPER
[
17] We also tried to extend the process to other tetrazine deriva-
tives such as 3,6-di(2Ј-pyridyl)tetrazine and 3,6-bis(trifluoro-
methyl)tetrazine, but the reactions led to complex mixtures
without any apparent evidence of the formation of the appro-
priate tricycles.
[
1] a) A. Hamasaki, J. M. Zimpleman, I. Hwang, D. L. Boger, J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 10767–10770; b) D. L. Boger, S. E.
Wolkenberg, J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 9120–9124.
[
2] a) U. Schirmer, B. Wuerzer, N. Meyer, F. A. Neugebauer, H.
Fischer, DE Patent No. 3508214, 1986; Chem. Abstr. 1987, 106,
[
18] Flash vacuum pyrolysis of 7a at various temperatures also gave
9
exclusively. Hamish McNab – unpublished results.
45718; b) W. Zambach, R. Naef, S. Trah, A. Jeanguenat, M.
[
19] The presence of 16a was unambiguously proved by a compari-
son of the mass spectroscopic fragmentation patterns of inde-
pendently prepared samples of N-propenylmorpholine and N-
allylmorpholine. Signals arising from 16a were also detected in
Eberle, A. Steiger, WO Patent Appl. 0078739, 2000; Chem.
Abstr. 2001, 134, 71613.
[
3] J. Sauer, “1,2,4,5-Tetrazines” in: Comprehensive Heterocyclic
Chemistry II (Volume Editor: A. J. Boulton; Eds.: A. R. Ka-
tritzky, C. W. Rees, E. F. V. Scriven), Pergamon Press, 1996; pp.
the NMR spectra of the volatile fraction in the vacuum pyroly-
1
sis of 7a. H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl
3
): δ = 5.7 (d, J = 15.8 Hz,
9
01–955.
4] a) A. Hamasaki, R. Ducray, D. L. Boger, J. Org. Chem. 2006,
1, 185–193; b) D. R. Soenen, J. M. Zimpleman, D. L. Boger,
1
H), 4.43 (dq, J = 15.8, 7.5 Hz, 1 H), 3.75 (t, J = 5.8 Hz, 4
[
H), 2.74 (t, J = 5.8 Hz, 4 H), 1.63 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 3 H) ppm.
20] Although the pyrolysed samples were of analytical purity, we
were unable to avoid the presence of absorbed water in the
pyrolysis-GC-MS apparatus, which might have led to the for-
mation of the aldehyde.
7
[
[
J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 3593–3598; c) A. Kotschy, J. Faragó,
A. Csámpai, D. M. Smith, Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 3421–3425.
5] D. L. Boger, C. W. Boyce, M. A. Labroli, C. A. Sehon, Q. Jin,
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 54–62.
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
21] The calculations were carried out using the B3LYP functional
and the Gaussian 03 package (M. J. Frisch, G. W. Trucks, H. B.
Schlegel, G. E. Scuseria, M. A. Robb, J. R. Cheeseman, V. G.
Zakrzewski, J. A. Montgomery Jr, R. E. Stratmann, J. C. Bu-
rant, S. Dapprich, J. M. Millam, A. D. Daniels, K. N. Kudin,
M. C. Strain, O. Farkas, J. Tomasi, V. Barone, M. Cossi, R.
Cammi, B. Mennucci, C. Pomelli, C. Adamo, S. Clifford, J.
Ochterski, G. A. Petersson, P. Y. Ayala, Q. Cui, K. Morokuma,
D. K. Malick, A. D. Rabuck, K. Raghavachari, J. B. Foresman,
J. Cioslowski, J. V. Ortiz, A. G. Baboul, B. B. Stefanov, G. Liu,
A. Liashenko, P. Piskorz, I. Komaromi, R. Gomperts, R. L.
Martin, D. J. Fox, T. Keith, M. A. Al-Laham, C. Y. Peng, A.
Nanayakkara, M. Challacombe, P. M. W. Gill, B. Johnson, W.
Chen, M. W. Wong, J. L. Andres, C. Gonzalez, M. Head-Gor-
don, E. S. Replogle, J. A. Pople, Gaussian 03, Revision A.9,
Gaussian, Inc., Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 1998).
6] D. L. Boger, S. M. Weinreb, Hetero Diels–Alder Methodology
in Organic Synthesis, Academic Press, 1997.
7] A. Kotschy, Gy. Hajós, A. Messmer, J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60,
4919–4922.
8] A. Kotschy, G. Timári, Gy. Hajós, A. Messmer, J. Org. Chem.
996, 61, 4423–4426.
1
9] A. Kotschy, Z. Novák, Z. Vincze, D. M. Smith, Gy. Hajós, Tet-
rahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 6313–6316.
10] A. Kotschy, D. M. Smith, A. Cs. Bényei, Tetrahedron Lett.
1998, 39, 1045–1048.
11] T. Klindert, P. von Hagel, L. Baumann, G. Seitz, J. Prakt.
Chem. 1997, 339, 623–632.
12] Sauer and coworkers demonstrated that the introduction of a
new substituent onto an electron-rich double bond usually
2
3
leads to a significant (10 –10 fold) decrease in reactivity
towards tetrazines: T. Hierstetter, B. Tischler, J. Sauer, Tetrahe-
dron Lett. 1992, 33, 8019–8022.
[
[
[
[
[
22] D. L. Boger, R. S. Coleman, J. S. Panek, F. X. Huber, J. Sauer,
J. Org. Chem. 1985, 50, 5377–5379.
[
[
[
[
13] W. Adam, O. De Lucchi, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1980, 19,
23] A. R. Katritzky, Q.-H. Long, P. Lue, Tetrahedron Lett. 1991,
762–779.
32, 3597–3600.
14] R. S. Warma, R. Dahiya, S. Kumar, Tetrahedron Lett. 1997,
8, 2039–2042.
15] A. G. Cook, M. L. Absi, V. K. Bowden, J. Org. Chem. 1995,
0, 3169–3171.
24] B. Sain, D. Prajapati, A. R. Mahajan, J. S. Sandhu, Bull. Soc.
Chim. Fr. 1994, 131, 313–316.
3
25] J. Sauer, A. Mielert, D. Lang, D. Peter, Chem. Ber. 1965, 98,
6
1435.
16] Although a similar reaction was published by D. R. Borthakur,
D. Prajapati, J. S. Sandhu, Heterocycles 1987, 26, 337–343, ac-
cording to our experience the products that they reported arise
from oxidation during chromatographic purification, rather
than from the suggested oxidative cleavage of the intermediate
bis-adduct.
26] S. Sueur, M. Lagrenee, F. Abraham, C. Bremard, J. Heterocycl.
Chem. 1987, 24, 1285–1289.
Received: January 23, 2006
Published Online: May 30, 2006
Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 3358–3363
© 2006 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
www.eurjoc.org
3363