112
W.A. Herrebout et al. / Journal of Molecular Structure 706 (2004) 107–113
The influence of a further increase of the basis set was
obtained by extrapolation of the plot of the complexation
energies for the aug-cc-PVXZ (X ¼ D, T and Q) levels as a
function of 1=n; in which n is the number of basis functions.
The plot and the linear regression line are shown in Fig. 5.
The abscissa of the linear regression line,
28.1(2) kJ mol21, gives the energy for an infinite basis
set and can be considered as the basis set limit. This value is
in acceptable agreement with the experimental value of of
26.8(8) kJ mol21
.
Acknowledgements
Fig. 5. Extrapolation of the calculated complexation energies obtained for
the complex of C2H4 with CO2. The complexation energies obtained by
using the different basis sets, and the number of basis functions in each
calculations were taken from Table 2.
S.N.D. thanks the FWO-Vlaanderen for an appointment
as a research assistant. Gratitude is expressed to the FWO-
Vlaanderen for their assistance toward the purchase of
spectroscopic equipment used in this study. The authors
thank the Flemish Community for financial support through
the Special Research Fund (BOF).
rotation states of the complex a similar dipole moment will
be present. This relatively small but not insignificant dipole
moment, and the absence of a permanent dipole moment in
the monomers, will certainly contribute to the increased
solute/solvent interaction for the complex. Then, the Monte
carlo calculations show that this very nearly compensates
the sterical loss of solvation.
References
[1] M.A. Blatchford, P. Raveendran, S.L. Wallen, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124
(2002) 14818.
In a next step DvapH0 was converted into an ‘experimen-
tal’ complexation energy DexpE by correcting for thermal
effects, using statistical thermodynamics. Zero-point
vibrational energies and thermal vibrational contributions
for the different species were calculated using the ab initio
frequencies. Thermal contributions were calculated at 96 K,
i.e. at the midpoint of the temperature intervals used to
determine DLArH0: Translational and rotational contri-
butions were obtained in the classical limit. These
calculations yielded a correction of 1.6 kJ mol21, and result
[2] M.A. Blatchford, P. Raveendran, S.L. Wallen, J. Phys. Chem. A. 107
(2003) 10311.
[3] Y. Danten, T. Tassaing, M. Besnard, J. Phys. Chem. A. 106 (2002)
11831.
[4] J.C. Dobrowolski, M.H. Jamroz, J. Mol. Struct. 275 (1992) 211.
[5] M. Kieninger, O.N. Ventura, J. Mol. Struct. (Theochem). 390 (1997)
157.
[6] J.C. Meredith, K.P. Johnston, J.M. Seminario, S.G. Kazarian, C.A.
Eckert, J. Phys. Chem. 100 (1996) 10837.
[7] G.P. Vanderzwet, L.J. Allamandola, F. Baas, J.M. Greenberg, J. Mol.
Struct. 195 (1989) 213.
[8] P. Raveendran, S.L. Wallen, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124 (2002) 12590.
[9] F.S. Nandel, D.V.S. Jain, Ind. J. Chem. A. 23 (1984) 543.
[10] M.R. Nelson, R.F. Borkman, J. Phys. Chem. A. 102 (1998) 7860.
[11] M.H. Jamroz, J.C. Dobrowolski, K. Bajdor, M.A. Borowiak, J. Mol.
Struct. 349 (1995) 9.
in a complexation energy DexpE equal to 26.8(8) kJ mol21
.
As before [14], the uncertainty on this number was taken to
be twice the experimental value, to account for the
approximations made while transforming the liquid phase
complexation enthalpy into a vapor phase complexation
energy.
[12] Z.H. Yu, T.A. Stone, C.C. Chuang, W. Drisdell, W. Klemperer,
J. Chem. Phys. 118 (2003) 7245.
[13] J.T. Reilly, C.P. Bokis, M.D. Donohue, Int. J. Thermophys. 16 (1995)
599.
It is of interest to compare DexpE with theoretical data
obtained from ab initio calculations. DexpE is somewhat
larger than the MP2 ¼ FULL/6-311þþG(2d,2p) value of
25.8 kJ mol21. This is in line with previous results showing
that at the level used, the CP-corrected complexation
energies tend to be underestimated, most likely due to a
basis set incompletness error.
[14] P. Van Ginderen, W.A. Herrebout, B.J. van der Veken, J. Phys. Chem.
A. 107 (2003) 5391.
[15] L. Fredin, B. Nelander, G. Ribbegard, Chemica Scripta 7 (1975) 11.
[16] L. Fredin, B. Nelander, Chem. Phys. 15 (1976) 473.
[17] X. Michaut, A.M. Vasserot, L. Abouaf-Marguin, Low Temp. Physics.
29 (2003) 852.
[18] L.M. Nxumalo, G.A. Yeo, T.A. Ford, Theor. Chem. Acc. 96 (1997)
157.
The effect of the size of the basis set on the complexation
energy was investigated by performing single point
calculations at the MP2/aug-cc-PVXZ (with X ¼ D, T and
Q) level, using the MP2/6-311þþG(2d,2p) geometries.
The resulting energies are collected in Table 2. It can be
seen that enlarging the basis set from aug-cc-PVDZ to aug-
cc-PVQZ increases the complexation energy by 18%.
[19] N.R. Zhang, D.D. Shillady, J. Chem. Phys. 100 (1994) 5230.
[20] J.R. Damewood, R.A. Kumpf, W.C.F. Muhlbauer, J. Phys. Chem. 93
(1989) 7640.
[21] Y. Abashkin, F. Mele, N. Russo, M. Toscano, Int. J. Quant. Chem. 52
(1994) 1011.
[22] A.J. Bienko, Z. Latajka, Chem. Phys. Lett. 374 (2003) 577.
[23] A. Givan, A. Loewenschuss, C.J. Nielsen, J. Mol. Struct. 604 (2002)
147.