LETTER
Oxidation of Various Kinds of Benzylic Alcohols
1441
and carboxylic acid 3f in 43% yield, even though only 1.0
equivalent of NaOCl was used at 0 °C. On the other hand,
the oxidation with 2.4 equivalents of NaOCl directly con-
verted 1f into 3f in 99% yield. The reaction products of
ester derivatives, 2g and 3g, could be controlled by the
amount of NaOCl. The reaction of 1g with 1.4 equivalents
of NaOCl at room temperature for 1.5 hours gave 2g in
Jones, E. R. H.; Lemin, A. J. J. Chem. Soc. 1953, 2548.
c) Collins, J. C.; Hess, W. W.; Frank, F. J. Tetrahedron Lett.
968, 9, 3363. (d) Corey, E. J.; Suggs, J. W. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1975, 16, 2647. (e) Corey, E. J.; Schmidt, G.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1979, 20, 399. (f) Piancatelli, G.; Scettri,
A.; D’Auria, M. Synthesis 1982, 245. (g) Czernecki, S.;
Georgoulis, C.; Stevens, C. L.; Vijayakumaran, K.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1985, 26, 1699.
(
1
2
3
90% yield, while the use of 2.8 equivalents of NaOCl at
(2) Fatiadi, A. J. Synthesis 1976, 133.
3) (a) Pitzner, K. E.; Moffatt, J. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1965, 87,
(
room temperature overnight converted 1g into 3g in 77%
yield. Traditionally, two steps are required to oxidize al-
cohols, first into aldehydes followed by further oxidation
to carboxylic acids. However, our reaction system was
found to provide an alternative method for the direct oxi-
dation of primary alcohols to carboxylic acids. Heterocy-
clic derivatives showed similar reactivity to 1a–g. While
the oxidation of 2-pyridinemethyl alcohol (1h) with 1.8
equivalents of NaOCl provided a mixture of 2h and 3h,
increasing the amount of NaOCl to 2.8 equivalents afford-
ed 3h in 99% yield (Table 2, entries 11 and 12). The oxi-
dation of 2-furylmethanol (1i) was found to proceed
slowly to give 2i in 31% yield, with 68% of 1i remaining
5
1
661. (b) Pitzner, K. E.; Moffatt, J. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
965, 87, 4214. (c) Albright, J. D.; Goldman, L. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1965, 87, 5671. (d) Parikh, J. R.; Doering, W. E.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1967, 89, 5505. (e) Omura, K.; Sharrma,
A. K.; Swern, D. J. Org. Chem. 1976, 41, 957. (f) Epstein,
W. W.; Sweat, F. W. Chem. Rev. 1967, 67, 247.
(
4) (a) Dess, D. B.; Martin, J. C. J. Org. Chem. 1983, 48, 4155.
(b) Dess, D. B.; Martin, J. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113,
7277. (c) Meyer, S. D.; Schreiber, S. L. J. Org. Chem. 1994,
5
9, 7549. (d) Frigerio, M.; Santagostino, M. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1944, 35, 8019. (e) Corey, E. J.; Palani, A. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1995, 36, 3485. (f) Frigerio, M.; Santagostino, M.;
Sputore, S.; Palmisano, G. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 7272.
(g) De Munari, S.; Frigerio, M.; Santagostino, M. J. Org.
Chem. 1996, 61, 9272.
(Table 2, entry 13). On the other hand, the reactions of 1j
(
5) (a) Omura, K.; Swern, D. Tetrahedron 1978, 34, 1651.
and 1k gave multiple products, and the reaction of 3-phe-
nyl-1-propanol (1l) did not proceed at all (entries 14–16).
(b) Mancuso, A. J.; Swern, D. Chem. Rev. 1981, 81, 165.
(
6) Plumb, J. B.; Harper, D. J. Chem. Eng. News 1990, 3.
Finally, secondary alcohols were also examined. When
(7) (a) Blackburn, T. F.; Schwartz, J. J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun. 1977, 157. (b) Nishimura, T.; Onoue, T.; Ohe, K.;
Uemura, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 6011.
1m, 1n, and 1o were treated under the conditions shown,
the desired products were obtained in 92%, 98%, and 99%
2
4
(c) Nishimura, T.; Onoue, T.; Ohe, K.; Uemura, S. J. Org.
Chem. 1999, 64, 6750. (d) ten Brink, G.-J.; Arends, I. W. C.
E.; Sheldon, R. A. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2002, 344, 355.
yield, respectively (Table 2, entries 17–19). However,
the oxidation of 1p did not proceed (Table 2, entry 20).
Benzoin (1q) did not give the corresponding ketone, but
benzoic acid in 94% yield owing to cleavage of the car-
bon–carbon single bond facilitated by a strong electron-
withdrawing group (Table 2, entry 21).
(
e) Schultz, M. J.; Park, C. C.; Sigman, M. S. Chem.
Commun. 2002, 3034. (f) ten Brink, G.-J.; Arends, I. W. C.
E.; Hoogenraad, M.; Verspui, G.; Sheldon, R. A. Adv. Synth.
Catal. 2003, 345, 497. (g) Bailie, D. S.; Clendenning, G. M.
A.; Muldoon, M. J. Chem. Commun. 2010, 7238.
In conclusion, we have developed a convenient oxidation
of various kinds of benzylic alcohols using the safe and
readily available reagent NaOCl in DME as solvent, lead-
ing to carbonyl compounds. Benzyl alcohol analogues
were converted into the corresponding aldehydes or ke-
tones. The oxidation of substrates containing electron-
withdrawing groups directly afforded the corresponding
carboxylic acids in high yield. To the best of our knowl-
edge, this is the first reported example of the oxidation of
alcohols using NaOCl as the oxidant without any addi-
tives under mild conditions. Therefore, this reaction has
the notable feature that the only waste product after oxida-
tion is NaCl, which makes it a green and practical strategy
to afford carbonyl compounds.
(
h) Csjernyik, G.; Éll, A. H.; Fadini, L.; Pugin, B.; Bäckvall,
J.-E. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 1657. (i) Jiang, B.; Feng, Y.;
Ison, E. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 14462. (j) Wang,
L.-Y.; Li, J.; Lv, Y.; Zhang, H.-Y.; Gao, S. J. Organomet.
Chem. 2011, 696, 3257.
(
8) (a) Barak, G.; Dakka, J.; Sasson, Y. J. Org. Chem. 1988, 53,
3
553. (b) Sato, K.; Aoki, M.; Takagi, J.; Noyori, R. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 12386. (c) Noyori, R.; Aoki, M.;
Sato, K. Chem. Commun. 2003, 1977.
(9) (a) Fujita, K.; Furukawa, S.; Yamaguchi, R. J. Organomet.
Chem. 2002, 649, 289. (b) Hanasaka, F.; Fujita, K.;
Yamaguchi, R. Organometallics 2005, 24, 3422. (c) Moyer,
S. A.; Funk, T. W. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010, 51, 5430.
10) (a) Wolfe, S.; Hasan, S. K.; Campbell, J. R. Chem. Commun.
(
1
970, 1420. (b) Grill, J. M.; Ogle, J. W.; Miller, S. A. J. Org.
Chem. 2006, 71, 9291.
(
11) (a) Morton, D.; Cole-Hamilton, D. J. J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun. 1988, 1154. (b) Ligthart, G. B. W. L.; Meijer, R.
H.; Donners, M. P. J.; Meuldijk, J.; Vekemans, J. A. J. M.;
Hulshof, L. A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 1507. (c) Zhang,
J.; Gandelman, M.; Shimon, L. J. W.; Rozenberg, H.;
Milstein, D. Organometallics 2004, 23, 4026. (d) Junge, H.;
Beller, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 1031. (e) Adair, G. R.
A.; Williams, J. M. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 8233.
Acknowledgment
The authors would like to thank Dr. Masahiro Kajino, Dr. Atsuhiko
Zanka, and Dr. David G. Cork for helpful discussions. We thank
Mr. Qingwei Zheng (Department of Chemistry, Tsinghua Universi-
ty) for his technical assistance.
(
f) van Buijtenen, J.; Meuldijk, J.; Vekemans, J. A. J. M.;
Hulshof, L. A.; Kooijman, H.; Spek, A. L. Organometallics
006, 25, 873. (g) Junge, H.; Loges, B.; Beller, M. Chem.
Commun. 2007, 522.
References and Notes
2
(1) (a) Bowden, K.; Heilbron, I. M.; Jones, E. R. H.; Weedon, B.
C. L. J. Chem. Soc. 1946, 39. (b) Bowers, A.; Halsall, T. G.;
©
Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York
Synlett 2013, 24, 1438–1442