Inorganic Chemistry
almost a planar structure. In this regard, the resultant enhanced
electron delocalization and charge transfer within ZnL1 will be
11
conducive to its intensive two-photon activity.
Photophysical Properties. Time-dependent density func-
tional theory (TD-DFT) calculations are implemented to
ST
ST
2
.08 and 0.83 eV (Figure 1c), respectively. The smaller ΔEST
of ZnL1 suggests its enhanced intersystem crossing (ISC)
1
process favors the type II process, which gives the efficient O
generation.
2
1
9−22
Because the reduction of oxygen to super-
oxide would require the oxidation capacity of the zinc complex,
complex ZnL1 has been investigated. As shown in Figure S12,
compared with that of L1, the lower oxidation potential of
ZnL1 (1.186 and 0.294 V for L1 and ZnL1, respectively)
makes the superoxide radical production (type I process)
easier.
Figure 2. (a) Two-photon (TP) action cross section of L1 and ZnL1
The UV−vis absorption spectra of L1 and ZnL1 are shown
in Figure S13. By adjusting the electronic properties of the
coordination metal, an absorption band located at 410 nm
emerged (in DMSO) for ZnL1 compared with that of L1,
which belonged to the ligand-to-metal charge transfer
(
(
excitation wavelength = 680−900 nm, identical energy = 500 mW).
b) ESR signals of L1/ZnL1 trapped by TEMP with and without light
irradiation (c = 10 μM). (c) ESR signals of ZnL1 trapped by DMPO
with and without light irradiation. (d) The increasing fluorescence
intensity of DHR123 (526 nm) in L1 and ZnL1 solution (10 μM)
2
3
(
LMCT) process. Also, the more abundant electron flow
−5
under light irradiation within 6 min (c = 1 × 10 mol/L, λex = 410
within ZnL1 is beneficial to the type I process. The
excitation at the maximum absorption wavelength, they exhibit
similar emission wavelengths. Interestingly, the fluorescence
quantum yield of ZnL1 was significantly lower than that in L1
in different solvents which may be due to the nature of
nm, EX slit = 5.0 nm, EM slit = 5.0 nm).
distinguish the photogenerated ROS species. Accordingly,
2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine (TEMP) and 5,5-dimethyl-1-
pyrroline-N-oxide (DMPO) were added into the targeted
1
·−
systems (L1 and ZnL1) to trap as the O and O trapping
2
2
agents, respectively. As illustrated in Figure 2b, characteristic
signals of 4-oxo-TEMPO (g = 2.0055, 1:1:1 triplet) under light
1
1
16
(
most of the S excitons convert into the T state favoring the
irradiation for L1 and ZnL1 were displayed, manifesting the
1
0
ST
1
production of O . In addition, the stronger signals of ZnL1
1
1
2
lived excited states with respect to those of L1 (4.25 and 7.24
ns for L1 and ZnL1, respectively), which is conducive to the
reveal its enhanced ISC behavior as a result of the smaller
ΔE . As shown in Figure 2c, no obviously ESR signals could
ST
29−31
be observed for ZnL1 in the dark.
accordant signals with DMPO−OOH as a spin derivative of
1
·−
ISC process favoring O2 generation (activated type II
DMPO−O were obtained for ZnL1, suggesting it has the
2
2
4,25
·−
process).
ability to reduce O to O2 species. The above results
2
We, herein, demonstrated that increased electron delocaliza-
photon absorption activity (Figure S17). Frankly, the results
unveiled that the two-photon absorption cross section of ZnL1
was enhanced 1.21 times that of L1 in the wavelength range
from 680 to 900 nm (Figure 2a).
elaborated that, thanks to the coordinated Zn atoms, ZnL1 can
the generated ROS were further confirmed by the probe 9,10-
anthracenedipropanoic acid (ABDA) and the O2· probe
−
dihydrorhodamine 123 (DHR123). The production efficien-
1
·−
1
Light Triggered O and O Generation. The above
cies of O by L1/ZnL1 were determined using ABDA as the
2
2
2
1
1
results motivated us to study the ROS generation ability of L1
and ZnL1. Therefore, 2′,7′-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diac-
O indicator. As we expected, their relative O quantum
2
2
yields (Φps) showed different values (0.09 and 0.72 for L1 and
etate (H DCF-DA), as an ROS indicator with a lighting-on
ZnL1, respectively) when using Rose Bengal (RB) (Φ = 0.75
2
RB
signal (green-emitting centered at 525 nm) when reacting with
ROS, was used to detect the ROS generation level of L1 and
2
20
ZnL1. After H DCF-DA was mixed with L1/ZnL1, upon
Intracellular ROS Detection. Benefiting from the high-
performance of ZnL1 in producing ROS in vitro, the study to
evaluate the ROS generation of ZnL1 inside HeLa cells was
2
illumination, the green-emitting signal of H DCF-DA
2
increased significantly, which showed that L1/ZnL1 could
26−28
6,32
produce effective reactive oxygen species.
At the same
carried out next. HeLa cells were incubated with both ZnL1
time, after 10 min of irradiation, it was found that the
ZnL1 to generate reactive oxygen species was significantly
higher than that of L1. Furthermore, electron spin resonance
and 2′,7′-dichlorofluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA); herein,
DCFH-DA was used as an intracellular ROS indicator. Then,
the resulting cells were exposed to 830 nm of light irradiation
(100 mW/cm ), and then, the confocal laser scanning
microscopy (CLSM) images were collected during incubation
2
(
ESR) trapping measurements were carried out to further
time. As shown in Figure 3a, the green fluorescent signals of
C
Inorg. Chem. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX