Paper
RSC Advances
electrode, respectively. Glassy carbon electrode (3 mm in diam- the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21521061
eter) coated with the as-prepared samples were used as the and 21701169), the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian
working electrodes. In the fabrication of the working electrode, Province (2006L2005), and the China Postdoctoral Science
the catalyst ink was prepared by dispersing 5.0 mg of the catalyst Foundation (2015M570561).
into a mixed solvent containing 0.98 mL of deionized water and
20 mL of 5 wt% Naon solution (D521, Alfa Aesar Co.), and then
the mixture was sonicated for 30 min to form a homogeneous
Notes and references
ink. Aer that, 5 mL of the catalyst ink was loaded onto glassy
carbon electrode and dried at room temperature. The electrolyte
was a 0.5 M H2SO4 aqueous solution (SCRC) and was purged with
nitrogen gas for 30 min prior to the measurements. In all
measurements, the saturated Ag/AgCl reference electrode was
calibrated with respect to reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE). In
0.5 M H2SO4, E(RHE) ¼ E(Ag/AgCl) + 0.198 V.
1 A. Kudo and Y. Miseki, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2009, 38, 253.
2 A. L. Goff, V. Artero, B. Jousselme, P. D. Tran, N. Guillet,
´
´
R. Metaye, A. Fihri, S. Palacin and M. Fontecave, Science,
2009, 326, 1384.
3 J. D. Holladay, J. Hu, D. L. King and Y. Wang, Catal. Today,
2009, 139, 244.
4 G. Ou, P. Fan, H. Zhang, K. Huang, C. Yang, W. Yu, H. Wei,
M. Zhong, H. Wu and Y. Li, Nano Energy, 2017, 35, 207.
5 M. Carmo, D. L. Fritz, J. Mergel and D. Stolten, Int. J.
Hydrogen Energy, 2013, 38, 4901.
4.3. H2 evolution from water electrolysis
The electrochemical reduction of silicotungstic acid
(H4SiW12O40) was carried out by a modied method:8,9 10 mmol
of H4SiW12O40 (SCRC) and 60 mL of deionized water were added
into one compartment of a two-compartment H-cell, and 0.9 mL
H3PO4 (13.3 mmol, SCRC) and 60 mL of deionized water were
placed into the other compartment. The compartments of the H-
cells were separated by a piece of 0.18 mm-thick Naon N-117
membrane (Alfa Aesar Co.). All electrochemical experiments
were performed by using a classical two-electrode conguration
(TPR6010S regulated power supply, ATTEN instruments Co.). The
H4SiW12O40 compartment was equipped with a large area carbon
felt working electrode (3 ꢃ 2 cm2), and the other compartment of
the cell was equipped with a large area platinum mesh working
electrode (1 ꢃ 1 cm2). To fully reduce H4SiW12O40 to H6SiW12O40
by two electrons, a potential of 8.3 V was set between the working
electrodes and 1931 C of charge was passed at this potential
(working current: 0.1 A, working time: 5.4 h). Prior to the exper-
iment, the H4SiW12O40 solution was bubbled with argon (60
mL minꢀ1) for 60 min, stirred vigorously and kept under an
argon atmosphere throughout the experiment.
50 mg of the as-prepared sample was dispersed in 5 mL of
deionized water in a 50 mL three-necked round-bottomed ask.
Aer thoroughly ushed with argon, the freshly produced
H6SiW12O40 (20 mL) was added to the sample aqueous disper-
sion under Ar atmosphere and stirred vigorously via a pressure-
equalizing dropping funnel. The evolving H2 gas was captured
in a 100 mL measuring cylinder lled with water. Furthermore,
the evolving H2 gas was identied by gas chromatography
(GC2014C, Shimazu Co., TCD, molecular sieve 5A column,
argon carrier).
6 M. Paidar, V. Fateev and K. Bouzek, Electrochim. Acta, 2016,
209, 737.
7 B. Rausch, M. D. Symes and L. Cronin, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2013, 135, 13656.
8 M. D. Symes and L. Cronin, Nat. Chem., 2013, 5, 403.
9 B. Rausch, M. D. Symes, G. Chisholm and L. Cronin, Science,
2014, 345, 1326.
10 Z. Huang, Z. Chen, Z. Chen, C. Lv, H. Meng and C. Zhang,
ACS Nano, 2014, 8, 8121.
11 P. Jiang, Q. Liu, Y. Liu, J. Tian, A. M. Asiri and X. Sun, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 2014, 53, 12855.
12 Q. Liu, J. Tian, W. Cui, P. Jiang, N. Cheng, A. M. Asiri and
X. Sun, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2014, 53, 6710.
13 X. Li, Y. Fang, F. Li, M. Tian, X. Long, J. Jin and J. Ma, J.
Mater. Chem. A, 2016, 4, 15501.
14 C. Tang, L. Gan, R. Zhang, W. Lu, X. Jiang, A. M. Asiri, X. Sun,
J. Wang and L. Chen, Nano Lett., 2016, 16, 6617.
15 L. Zhou, M. Shao, J. Li, S. Jiang, M. Wei and X. Duan, Nano
Energy, 2017, 41, 583.
16 S. Cao, C. J. Wang, W. F. Fu and Y. Chen, ChemSusChem,
2017, 10, 4306.
17 W. Wu, X. Yue, X. Y. Wu and C. Z. Lu, RSC Adv., 2016, 6,
24361.
18 X. Wang, Y. V. Kolen'ko, X. Q. Bao, K. Kovnir and L. Liu,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2015, 54, 8188.
19 X. Wang, Y. V. Kolen'ko and L. Liu, Chem. Commun., 2015,
51, 6738.
20 X. Wang, W. Li, D. Xiong, D. Y. Petrovykh and L. Liu, Adv.
Funct. Mater., 2016, 26, 4067.
21 W. Li, X. Gao, D. Xiong, F. Xia, J. Liu, W. Song, J. Xu,
S. M. Thalluri, M. F. Cerqueira, X. Fu and L. Liu, Chem.
Sci., 2017, 8, 2952.
Conflicts of interest
22 X. Yang, A. Lu, Y. Zhu, M. N. Hedhili, S. Min, K. Huang,
Y. Han and L. Li, Nano Energy, 2015, 15, 634.
23 Y. Zhu, Y. Liu, T. Ren and Z. Yuan, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2015,
25, 7337.
There are no conicts to declare.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Strategic Priority Research 24 Y. Hou, A. B. Laursen, J. Zhang, G. Zhang, Y. Zhu, X. Wang,
Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDB20000000),
the Key Program of Frontier Science, CAS (QYZDJ-SSW-SLH033),
S. Dahl and I. Chorkendorff, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2013, 52,
3621.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2018
RSC Adv., 2018, 8, 39291–39295 | 39295