Inorganic Chemistry
Article
nanosheet, which clearly revealed that numerous small CeO2
particles with uniform size distribution homogeneously laid on
the carbon nanosheet walls. Furthermore, the crystallinity of
small CeO2 particles and the carbon nanosheet was determined
by using HRTEM and selective area electron diffraction (SAED)
patterns. The high-resolution TEM image (Figure 2c) showed
interplanar distance assigned to (111) planes of cubic CeO2
(0.311 nm), revealing that the small particles were CeO2
nanoparticles. The corresponding SAED pattern showed that
polycrystalline rings (Figure 2d) matched well with cubic CeO2.
Scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) elemental
profiles and elemental mapping were employed to further study
the inter-structure and composition. As shown in Figure 2e,g,
the STEM image of the exfoliated ultrathin 2D nanosheets and
the corresponding elemental line profiles (Figure 2f) and
mapping profiles (Figure 2h−k) showed the uniform distribu-
tion of elements Ce, O, C, and N in the nanosheet. Therefore,
through the pyrolysis decomposition, the cerium ions in the Ce-
MOFs had been converted into CeO2 nanoparticles, while the
organic ligands (1,2,4,5-benzenetetracarboxylic acid) and
regulator (1,2-benzisothiazolin-3(2H)-one) could be easily in
situ carbonized to form the N-doped carbon layer. Meanwhile,
during the annealing process, the produced gas escaped from the
inside of the Ce-MOF precursor, which resulted in the
formation of a loosely porous structure. The porosity of
CeO2@N−C USHR was further investigated by N2 adsorp-
tion−desorption isotherms. The N2 sorption isotherms showed
that CeO2@N−C USHR had a Brunauer−Emmett−Teller
surface area of about 45.6 m2/g, and the pore distribution was
mainly centered at about 4 nm according to the Barrett−
Joyner−Halenda method (Figure 2l).
respectively.32,33 The high-resolution O 1 s spectrum (Figure
3b) could be split into three peaks, which could be ascribed to
the lattice oxygen (OL) at 529.6 eV, oxygen-deficient regions
(OV) at 530.1 eV, and chemisorbed oxygen (OC) at 531.8 eV.34
The C 1 s spectrum (Figure 3c) indicated the peaks assigned to
binding energy at 284.7 eV (CC/C−C bonds), 285.6 eV (C−
N bonds), and 289.3 eV (C−O bonds), respectively.35 Figure 3d
shows a high-resolution N 1s spectrum, which could be split into
two Gaussian components centered at 399.8 eV corresponding
to N−graphene bonds and 407.2 eV corresponding to N−O
bonds. Therefore, the XPS results further indicated that the
CeO2@N−C USHR nanostructure was composed of CeO2
nanoparticles coated by N-doped C layers.
The uniformly N-doped C-coated CeO2 nanoparticles with
hierarchical architecture provided highly approachable adsorp-
tion and active catalytic sites, leading to the promising
performance of CeO2@N−C USHR as the catalyst. The ability
of CeO2@N−C USHR to catalyze the oxidation reaction of
benzyl alcohol to benzaldehyde in water had been investigated.
The influences of the catalyst amount on the reaction yields
toward oxidation of benzyl alcohol to benzaldehyde had been
studied, and the data are shown in Figure S6. It can be seen that
when the catalyst amount increased from 10 to 50 mg, the
conversion of benzyl alcohol increased from 25.1 to 99.9%.
Thus, the catalyst amount was set at 50 mg in the following
catalytic tests. The blank experiments indicated that no
oxidation occurs in the absence of heating or catalysts, indicating
that the usage of an appropriate catalyst and heating were the
two key elements for this reaction (Table S1). Therefore, the
catalytic oxidation of benzyl alcohol was performed in glass
pressure bottles in the water at different temperatures (Figure
4a). To thoroughly investigate the catalytic performance of
CeO2@N−C USHR (CeO2 nanoparticles coated by N-doped
C), CeO2@C USHR (CeO2 nanoparticles coated by C, Figure
S7), pure CeO2 USHR (CeO2 nanoparticles, Figure S8), and
commercial CeO2 (Figure S9) are used as reference samples.
The 13C NMR spectra of benzyl alcohol and benzaldehyde are
shown in Figure S10. As shown in Figure 4b, CeO2@N−C
USHR exhibited production yield reaching above 99.9% after 48
h, which was the highest catalytic activity.7,36−38 The catalytic
activity of four samples followed the trend CeO2@N−C USHR
> CeO2@C USHR > CeO2 USHR > commercial CeO2. The
above catalytic experiments indicated that both the morphology
(hierarchical architecture assembled by ultrathin nanosheets)
and the composite (N-doped C layer) have important effects on
their catalytic activity. The nanosheet self-assembled hierarch-
ical architecture increased the specific surface area of the catalyst
and exposed more active sites. The N-doped C layer might act as
the medium to strengthen the adsorption of reactants (benzyl
alcohol) on CeO2 catalysts and reduced the activation energy of
the catalytic reaction. To investigate the origin and reveal the
activity of CeO2@N−C USHR for the oxidation of benzyl
alcohol to benzaldehyde, the kinetic analysis for catalytic
oxidation was performed. Figure 4c shows the curves of benzyl
alcohol conversion versus reaction time at different reaction
temperatures. It appeared that the conversion of benzyl alcohol
increased when the reaction temperature increased from 353 to
423 K. The trend of yields for different catalysts at various
temperatures matched well with the yield at 150 °C (Figure S11
4d), where k is the rate constant obtained by the linearly fitting
relationship between the yield of benzyl alcohol and the reaction
time according to the integral rate equation. As shown in Figure
The surface chemical composition and valence states of
CeO2@N−C USHR were further revealed by X-ray photo-
electron spectroscopy (XPS). The survey spectrum (Figure S5)
showed the existence of Ce, O, C, and N elements in the CeO2@
N−C USHR sample. Figure 3a shows the high-resolution Ce 3d
spectrum with two kinds of splitted peaks (Ce 3d3/2 labeled with
U and Ce 3d3/2 labeled with V). U1, U0, V1, and V0 reflected the
Ce3+ characteristic peaks, whereas U3, U2, U, V3, V2, and V
corresponded with Ce4+ characteristic peaks. In addition, the
Ce3+ and Ce4+ portions can be calculated to be 28.7 and 71.3%,
Figure 3. High-resolution XPS spectra of the CeO2@N−C USHR
nanoparticle, (a) Ce 3d, (b) O 1s, (c) C 1s, and (d) N 1s.
7734
Inorg. Chem. 2021, 60, 7732−7737