Surface Structures of Rh Dimers
J. Phys. Chem., Vol. 100, No. 32, 1996 13641
new peak at 2919 cm- appeared similarly to the cases of Rh2/
SiO2 and Rh2/TiO2. It is likely that the Rh dimer complex
reacted with the surface OH groups on the methyl ligand and
the Cp* on Al2O3 surface.
1
TABLE 5: Curve-Fitting Results of the EXAFS Data for the
2
TiO -Attached Rh Dimers
sample
assigned bond
Ru-O
Rh-C(µ-CH
CN
r/nm
σ/nm
8
1.8 ( 0.7 0.220 ( 0.003 0.005 ( 0.003
1.5 ( 1.2 0.207 ( 0.006 0.005 ( 0.003
2
)
By introduction of CO at 313 K, intense carbonyl peaks
appeared at 2017 and 1953 cm (Figure 5c). These two peaks
9
Ru-O(dicarbonyl) 0.8 ( 0.3 0.300 ( 0.002 0.005 ( 0.002
-1
Ru-O(surface)
Rh-C(µ-CH
1.7 ( 0.3 0.220 ( 0.002 0.005 ( 0.003
1.5 ( 1.2 0.206 ( 0.007 0.005 ( 0.003
behaved together under various conditions like those of dicar-
bonyls on Rh2/SiO2 and Rh2/TiO2. The low frequencies of the
carbonyl peak suggested that there should be a kind of
interaction between two Rh atoms. Besides the dicarbonyl peak,
a peak at 2084 cm- was also observed, suggesting a hetero-
geneous property of the Rh sites. The antisymmetric stretching
peak of dicarbonyls on Rh(I) monomers supported on Al2O3
has been reported to appear at similar wavenumbers as shown
in Table 4. The higher frequency peak of 2084 cm may be
due to isolated Rh sites which were formed by decomposition
of the Rh dimer complex at the surface.
By treatment at 453 K, the peak at 2017 and 1953 cm-
2
)
Rh-C(dicarbonyl) 1.2 ( 0.8 0.188 ( 0.005 0.005 ( 0.003
1
1
0
1
Rh-Rh
Ru-O(surface)
Rh-C(µ-CO)
1.0 ( 0.6 0.267 ( 0.002 0.007 ( 0.003
1.4 ( 0.4 0.218 ( 0.002 0.005 ( 0.003
1.2 ( 0.8 0.205 ( 0.006 0.005 ( 0.003
1
Ru-O(dicarbonyl) 1.2 ( 0.4 0.300 ( 0.003 0.007 ( 0.002
Ru-O(surface)
1.4 ( 0.3 0.219 ( 0.002 0.005 ( 0.003
Rh-C(dicarbonyl) 0.8 ( 0.6 0.185 ( 0.005 0.005 ( 0.003
0a
1
Rh-Rh
Ru-O(surface)
Rh-C(µ-CO)
1.0 ( 0.6 0.267 ( 0.003 0.007 ( 0.003
1.4 ( 0.4 0.218 ( 0.002 0.005 ( 0.003
1.2 ( 0.8 0.205 ( 0.006 0.005 ( 0.003
2
3
-1
a
After heating species 11 at 473 K again.
1
decreased in intensity (Figure 5d). A weak peak appeared at
Upon CO adsorption on the Rh species treated at 373 K, a
second peak in Figure 3b appeared at 0.22-0.29 nm. Curve-
fitting analysis for the second peak was carried out for two
models for bonding as Rh-Rh or Rh---O (carbonyl). The best
fit was obtained by Rh---O rather than Rh-Rh, and the distance
and the coordination number were determined to be 0.300 (
-1
1
714 cm , which was assigned to the acyl species, compared
with the absorption of the acyl observed on Rh2/SiO2. Acyl
species formed on Rh2/Al2O3 was less than 23% of total Rh
sites, estimated from its intensity. Unlike Rh2/SiO2, it seems
that the majority of the adsorbed CO desorbed without acyl
formation on Rh2/Al2O3. The adsorption and desorption of
adsorbed CO occurred reversibly.
0.002 nm and 0.8 ( 0.3, respectively, in Table 5. There was
no Rh-Rh bond when CO was adsorbed on the Rh dimers.
Combining the EXAFS data with the IR data and the volumetric
analyses, it is concluded that two CO molecules per Rh dimer
were adsorbed. For the first shell of Figure 3b, Rh-C(alkyl)
and Rh-C(Cp*) were neglected and three-shell fitting was
performed. The characterized bonds at 0.220 ( 0.002, 0.188
3.4.2. EXAFS Analysis. Figure 6a-c shows the k-weighted
EXAFS oscillations for the Al2O3-attached Rh dimers, after
treatment at 373 K, exposure to CO at 313 K, and treatment at
473K under vacuum, respectively. The EXAFS oscillation in
the high-energy region was weak for all the samples on Al2O3.
This may be ascribed to the fact that the Rh-Rh was not
retained to Rh2/SiO2 and Rh2/TiO2. The curve fitting analysis
was carried out and the results were given in Table 6. No Rh-
Rh distance was found in 0.2-0.3 nm. The proposed trans-
formation of the Rh dimers on Al2O3 is depicted in Scheme 3.
The species for Rh2/Al2O3 are proposed mostly to be monomer
pairs without Rh-Rh bonding where there should be interaction
between with two Rh atoms because the dicarbonyl species
showed low-frequency peaks in IR than those of the dicarbonyls
(
0.005, and 0.206 ( 0.007 nm are attributable to Rh-O
(
surface), Rh-C (carbonyl), and Rh-C (µ-CH2), respectively,
from the comparison with species 8 as shown in Table 5. Thus,
the first shell of species 9 with the dicarbonyls has a similar
local structure to species 5 in Rh2/SiO2. Based on the IR and
EXAFS analyses, structure 9 was proposed as shown in Scheme
2
(9).
Species 9 was subsequently treated at 473 K. The second
peak still appeared in the Fourier transform as shown in Figure
c. The second peak was curve-fitted on the assumption of
2
3
3
on Rh(I) monomers often reported in the literature.
Rh-Rh bonding. The curve-fitting result is shown in Figure
3.5. MgO-Attached Rh Dimers (Rh /MgO). MgO did not
easily react with the Rh dimer complex, and the characteristic
2
4
0
a, and the obtained distance and coordination number were
.267 ( 0.002 nm and 1.0 ( 0.6, respectively, as shown in
IR absorption bands of the Rh dimer complex did not change
until 473 K as shown in Figure 7d. The species obtained at
473 K was exposed to CO at 313 K, and three kinds of ν(CO)
at 2013, 1938, and 1884 cm- were observed by IR (Figure
7e). The behaviors of these peaks were independent of one
another because the 1884 cm- peak disappeared by treatment
Table 5. This result implies that Rh-Rh bond was reproduced
again at the surface like Rh2/SiO2.5 Two-shell analysis for
species 10 treated at 473 K gave good fitting results for the
first shell as 0.218 ( 0.002 and 0.205 ( 0.006 nm for Rh-O
1
1
(surface) and Rh-C (bridged CO), respectively (Table 5).
-1
After CO adsorption on species 10 at 313 K again, curve-
at 373 K and then the 2013 cm peak disappeared at 473 K,
while the 1938 cm- peak remained. This behavior of the
adsorbed carbonyls is entirely different from that of the
dicarbonyls adsorbed on the Rh dimers discussed above. But
these peaks appear at low frequencies like the dicarbonyls on
Rh2/SiO2, Rh2/TiO2, and Rh2/Al2O3. Acyl formation was not
observed under any conditions. Two kinds of peaks around
2600-2800 cm- appeared at 473 K. They were assigned to
Mg-OD groups generated by HD exchange between d-Cp* and
Mg-OH groups.
1
fitting analysis of the second peak of the Fourier transformed
spectrum was performed. We obtained the best fitting result
when Rh---O (carbonyl) is assumed as shown in Figure 4b,
indicating breakage of the Rh-Rh bond by dicarbonyl formation
(Rh---O (carbonyl) at 0.300 nm). By subsequent treatment at
4
73 K, Rh-Rh bond was reproduced accompanied by µ-CO
1
formation again as shown in Scheme 2 (10).
In summary, reversible formation-breaking of Rh-Rh bond
accompanied by reversible µ-CO formation-dicarbonyl forma-
tion was observed on Rh2/TiO2 by EXAFS.
Figure 8a shows k-weighted EXAFS oscillation observed after
3
.4. Al2O3-Attached Rh Dimers (Rh2/Al2O3). 3.4.1. IR
treatment at 473 K. Amplitude of the oscillation did not
decrease till the high-energy region. Fourier transform for k -
weighted EXAFS oscillation is shown in Figure 8b. The peak
at 0.25 nm is attributed to Rh-Rh bonding which is stronger
as compared with other attached Rh dimers. Curve-fitting
3
Study. Figure 5 shows in situ FT-IR spectra observed for the
Al2O3-attached Rh dimers (3) . After treatment at 373 K, the
intensity of ν(CH) peaks at 2937 and 2869 cm- for the
methylene ligand and ν(CD) peaks for Cp* decreased and a
1