458
A. Persky / Chemical Physics Letters 401 (2005) 455–458
Fig. 2 includes also the results of QM [14] and of QCT
17] calculations, based on the SW PES. As can be seen
correctly the rate constants reported here for the two
channels of the reaction of F atoms with HD.
[
from Fig. 2, the experimental results are between the
QCT and the QM results. The QCT results are some-
what lower than the experimental results, since they do
not include any tunneling contributions. On the other
hand, the QM results are higher than the experimental
results, probably because of excessive tunneling contri-
butions. The differences in the tunneling contributions
for the two channels of the reaction of F atoms with
HD are clearly observed by comparing the correspond-
ing figures (Fig. 1a,b). While for the F + DH channel,
the QM and QCT results are rather close and do not dif-
fer significantly from the experimental results, in the
temperature range of this study, significant differences
are observed for the F + HD channel and they increase
as the temperature is lowered. As pointed up in Section
References
[
[
1] D.E. Manolopoulos, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 93 (1997) 673.
2] S.C. Althorpe, D.C. Clary, Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem. 54 (2003) 493.
[3] E. Wurzberg, P.L. Houston, J. Chem. Phys. 72 (1980) 4811.
[4] M.A.A. Clyne, A. Hodgson, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans., 2 81
(
1985) 443.
5] P.S. Stevens, W.H. Brune, J.G. Anderson, J. Phys. Chem. 93
1989) 4068.
6] A. Persky, H. Kornweitz, Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 29 (1997) 67.
[
(
[
[7] A. Persky, J. Chem. Phys. 59 (1973) 5578.
[8] K. Stark, H.-J. Werner, J. Chem. Phys. 104 (1996) 6515.
[9] J.F. Castillo, D.E. Manolopoulos, Faraday Discuss., Chem. Soc.
1
10] J.F. Castillo, D.E. Manolopoulos, K. Stark, H.-J. Werner, J.
10 (1998) 119.
[
1
, following the discussion in [9], the large differences in
Chem. Phys. 104 (1996) 6531.
[11] F.J. Aoiz, L. Banares, B. Martinez-Haya, J.F. Castillo, D.E.
Manolopoulos, K. Stark, H.-J. Werner, J. Phys. Chem. A 101
the tunneling contributions for the two competing chan-
nels F + HD and F + DH are rather expected.
(
1997) 6403.
This study clearly indicates that the SW PES predicts
too much tunneling for the F + HD channel of the reac-
tion of F atoms with HD. This is consistent with earlier
conclusions based on the comparison between QM and
experimental cross-sections for this reaction [12,13] and
on the comparison between QM and experimental re-
sults for the ratios of rate constants kF + HD/kF + DH
[
[
12] R.T. Skodje, D. Skouteris, D.E. Manolopoulos, S.-H. Lee, F.
Dong, K. Liu, J. Chem. Phys. 112 (2000) 4536.
13] R.T. Skodje, D. Skouteris, D.E. Manolopoulos, S.-H. Lee, F.
Dong, K. Liu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 (2000) 1206.
[14] D.H. Zhang, S.-Y. Lee, M. Baer, J. Chem. Phys. 112 (2000) 9802.
[
[
15] H. Kornweitz, A. Persky, J. Phys. Chem. A 108 (2004) 8599.
16] E. Rosenman, S. Hochman-Kowal, A. Persky, M. Baer, Chem.
Phys. Lett. 257 (1996) 421.
[14,15]. It seems that some modifications in the SW
PES are needed in order to close the gaps between the-
[17] F.J. Aoiz, L. Banares, V.J. Herrero, V.S. Rabanos, K. Stark, I.
Tanarro, H.-J. Werner, Chem. Phys. Lett. 262 (1996) 175.
[18] R. Edrei, A. Persky, Chem. Phys. Lett. 157 (1989) 265.
oretical and experimental results for the F + H system.
2
[
[
19] E. Schwartz, A. Persky, Chem. Phys. Lett. 196 (1992) 133.
20] A. Persky, J. Phys. Chem. 100 (1996) 689, An updated Arrhenius
equation and a value at 298 K for kFþCH4 based on updated
recommended values for kFþH2 are given in [21].
Recently, Aquilanti et al. [24,25] carried out QM calcu-
lations for the F + H reaction using the SW PES, after
2
it was modified in the entrance channel. The barrier for
the modified PES is broader than the barrier of the ori-
ginal SW PES, thus reducing the amount of tunneling,
while the barrier height is preserved. The QM rate con-
stants obtained by them were found to be in good agree-
[21] A. Persky, Chem. Phys. Lett. 298 (1998) 390, Erratum: Chem.
Phys. Lett. 306 (1999) 416.
22] A. Persky, Chem. Phys. Lett. 376 (2003) 181.
[
[
[
23] A. Persky, Chem. Phys. Lett. 380 (2003) 286.
24] V. Aquilanti, S. Cavalli, D. De Fazio, A. Volpi, A. Aguilar, X.
Gimenez, J.M. Lucas, Chem. Phys. Lett. 371 (2003) 504.
ment with the experimental data for the F + H reaction
2
[3–6]. It would be very interesting to find out whether
this PES, or any other modified SW PES, reproduces
[25] V. Aquilanti, S. Cavalli, D. De Fazio, A. Volpi, A. Aguilar, J.M.
Lucas, Chem. Phys. 308 (2005) 237.