Angewandte
Communications
Chemie
Table 2: Influence of formic acid concentration on the Ru@pTPP-
[a]
catalyzed FA decomposition.
FA conc.
wt%]
t
FA conv.
[%]
[CO](g)
[ppm]
Ru loss
[%]
[
[min]
3
6
9
0
0
0
126
150
150
99
99
88
249
465
3108
0.7
11.2
31.3
[
a] Conditions: 50 mL Hastelloy autoclave, 3 g (=97.8 mmol) FA, 75 mg
Ru@pTPP (=0.0076 mol% Ru).
Figure 2. Recycling study of the Ru@pDPPE catalyst.
At 30 wt% FA, full conversion was observed after
1
26 min (TON 13160). The CO content of the gas phase
was 249 ppm and 0.7% Ru leached. Compared to the data
above (Table 1), the higher FA concentration led to a slight
increase in CO production, but leaching was not affected. In
contrast, at even higher FA concentrations both CO produc-
tion and leaching increased severely. This suggests that at high
concentrations the carbonic acid displaces the phosphine,
leading to the formation of homogeneous species and possibly
nanoparticles which exhibit significantly lower selectivity.
Nevertheless, the data emphasize that up to 30 wt% FA can
be tolerated without a significant effect on catalyst perfor-
mance.
completion and a final TON of 30760 was achieved after
seven runs for both series.
In the start–stop experiments, the TOF dropped signifi-
cantly after the first run. After that, the rate decreased only
slowly. At the end of the series still 76% of the initial activity
remained, confirming that the supported catalyst is quite
stable. The CO concentration slightly increased to 89 ppm
and in the end 10% of the employed Ru had leached into
solution. TEM images of the spent catalyst did reveal a few
isolated Ru nanoparticles, but overall the catalyst was clean
(
see SI). Thus the data suggest that most of the metal remains
The influence of the presence of LA and H SO was tested
2
4
molecularly dispersed on the polymer. In the solvent-change
series the activity dropped rapidly in the first three runs. After
this, the activity decreased more slowly and the CO concen-
tration increased up to 318 ppm in the last run. Interestingly,
the amount of leached Ru was consistently low (0.4–0.5%)
during the first three runs. Therefore it is proposed that the
steep decrease in activity stems from loss of the catalyst
during the filtration procedure. After the fourth run, leaching
increased (0.6–4.6%) and a cumulative amount of 11% was
lost after the last run.
using Ru@pDDPE (Figure 3). With 0.33 equiv LA (with
respect to FA) in 10 wt% FA solution, FA was rapidly
converted, although the TOF decreased to 14000 h . Leach-
À1
ing and CO formation were not affected. Also with 5 wt% FA
These results clearly demonstrate that the polymer-
supported catalysts exhibit high activity and stability in
clean dilute formic acid solutions. However, the conversion
of cellulose to LA yields a complex mixture containing LA,
FA, and H SO4 as well as tar/chars and soluble humins.
2
Insoluble by-products can be removed, for example, by
filtration. Removal of H SO with CaO yields CaSO , which
Figure 3. Effect of different contaminants on the Ru@pDPPE-catalyzed
decomposition of formic acid.
2
4
4
in turn can be regenerated to CaO and SO . Suitable
3
separation strategies for the other organic components
include extraction or rectification. For example, LA can be
extracted with organic solvents such as MeTHF. Alterna-
tively, fractional distillation can be used to remove water/FA
and 1 equiv LA, the catalyst performed comparably and full
conversion was achieved within 22 min. Interestingly, no GVL
was observed during these reactions. The in situ conversion of
LA was studied in a 24 h reaction and only 6% GVL was
found afterwards indicating that Ru@pDPPE is not suitable
for the hydrogenation of LA under these conditions. Never-
theless, FA could be selectively removed from a feed
containing LA. In the presence of 2 wt% H SO the reaction
(
azeotrope at 22% FA) and LA from the reaction mixture.
Thus depending on the employed process design, different
product streams can arise. Therefore, we chose to test the
capability of the catalyst to work under various reaction
conditions including different FA concentrations and the
presence of sulfuric and levulinic acid, respectively. Finally,
a crude mixture prepared via dehydration of glucose served as
substrate for selective FA decomposition.
The influence of FA concentration was tested using
Ru@pTPP (Table 2). The FA concentrations were set by
varying the amount of water, while keeping the catalyst and
FA amounts constant.
2
4
with 10 wt% FA was considerably slower and CO formation
increased to 5042 ppm. Thus the data show that 2 wt% H SO
2
4
is detrimental for the catalytic activity and should be removed
prior to FA decomposition.
Finally the conversion of FA in a crude LA synthesis
mixture was attempted. For this purpose a glucose solution
containing H SO was subjected to 1908C for 30 min (Fig-
2
4
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 5597 –5601
ꢀ 2016 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
5599