Angewandte Chemie International Edition
10.1002/anie.201703550
COMMUNICATION
plasma was 207 ± 32 °C (Table 1). From these results we
conclude that the plasma is responsible for the observed heating
effect.
transition point where methane activation becomes rate limiting,
it is likely that the plasma activation of methane in the gas phase
then leads to a reduced activation barrier for the surface process
and thus the ability of the NTP-process to occur at much
reduced temperatures. It cannot be discounted that the Pd
nanoparticles may become more defective in the presence of
The fact that there is no significant nanoparticle size or
catalyst loading dependent changes on the temperatures
calculated from the XAFS may suggest that the surface of the
whole catalyst (nanoparticle and oxide) is being heated. The
XAFS data only probes the Pd and this, however, does not
preclude the alumina surface from also being heated. In this
case the support and nanoparticle would be in thermal
equilibrium, therefore, leading to similar changes in temperature
for all the catalysts studied.
the plasma and more open faces have been reported to offer a
[3]
lower activation barrier for CH
4
dehydrogenation.
However,
this effect is likely to be small compared with the pre-activation
of the CH in the gas phase under plasma conditions.
4
Acknowledgements
Taking account of all the data acquired, the estimated
temperature of the nanoparticles during NTP activated CH
oxidation is 162 ± 24 °C, within the error of the calculated
temperature from the exothermicity of the methane oxidation
4
The authors acknowledge the Diamond Light Source for
provision of beamtime (SP12986-1 and SP10306-9). The UK
Catalysis Hub is kindly thanked for resources and support
provided via our membership of the UK Catalysis Hub
Consortium and funded by EPSRC (Portfolio Grants
EP/K014706/2, EP/K014668/1, EP/K014854/1, EP/K014714/1
and EP/I019693/1). Open access data can be found via the
University of Manchester research portal. We also thank Eleanor
Dann and Rahmin Gholami for their help.
reaction. Therefore,
a clear difference in temperature is
observed between the EXAFS estimation and that measured via
the infrared camera. Almost a two-fold increase in temperature
of the nanoparticles is measured compared to the overall
temperature of the catalyst bed. However, this temperature
(
162 °C) is not high enough to activate the thermal reaction, as
observed from the light-off curve of the thermal reaction for
sample 1, shown in Figure 5.
Keywords: non-thermal plasma • EXAFS spectroscopy •
100
oxidation• heterogeneous catalysis • methane
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
[
1]
a) R. Burch, P. K. Loader, F. J. Urbano, Catal. Today, 1996, 27, 243-
48; b) J. Nilsson, P.-A. Carlsson, S. Fouladvand, N. M. Martin, J.
2
Gustafson, M. A. Newton, E. Lundgren, H. Grönbeck, M. A. Skoglundh,
ACS Catal. 2015, 5, 2481-2489; c) M. Lyubovsky, L. Pfefferle, Catal.
Today 1999, 47, 29-44.
[
[
[
2]
3]
4]
R. J. Farrauto, Science, 2012, 337, 659-660.
M. Jørgensen, H. Grönbeck, ACS Catal., 2016, 6, 6730−6738.
a) C. E. Stere, W. Adress,; R. Burch, S. Chansai, A. Goguet, W. G.
Graham, F. D. Rosa, V. Palma, C. Hardacre, ACS Catal. 2014, 4, 666-
6
73; b) A. Mizuno, Catal. Today, 2013, 211, 2-8; c) T. P Huu,.S. Gil, P.
D. Costa, A. Giroir-Fendler, A. Khacef, Catal. Today, 2015, 257, 86-92
d) C.E. Stere, J.A. Anderson, S. Chansai, J.J. Delgado, A. Goguet,
W.G. Graham, C. Hardacre, S.F.R. Taylor, X. Tu, Z. Wang, H. Yang,
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2017, 56, 5579-5583; e) H. Lee, D.-H. Lee, Y.-
H. Song, W. C. Choi, Y.-K. Park, D. H. Kim, Chem. Eng. J., 2015, 259,
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
Temperature / °C
4 2
Figure 5. Light-off profile 5000 ppm CH , 5% O , 5% Ar and He balance.
7
61–770.
a) M. Foix, C. Guyon, M. Tatoulian, P. D. Costa, Catal. Commun., 2010,
2, 20-24; b) J. V. Durme, J. Dewulf, C. Leys, H. V. Langenhove, Appl.
[
5]
This in situ study has provided evidence to address the
hypothesis proposed regarding the role of the NTP in the hybrid
catalytic reaction. Herein, it is clear that no significant structural
changes are found within the catalyst on application of the NTP
1
Catal. B, 2008, 78, 324-333.
[
6]
7]
Y.-F Guo, D.-Q. Ye, K.-F Chen, J.-C. He, W.-L Chen, J. Mol. Cat. A,
2006, 245, 93-100.
under CH
the Pd nanoparticles but the temperature of the nanoparticles is
lower than that necessary to activate the thermal CH oxidation
4 4 2
and CH +O conditions. In addition, the NTP heats
[
a) C.-J. Liu, K. Yu, Y.-P. Zhang, X. Zhu, F. He, B. Eliasson, Appl.
Catal.B, 2004, 47, 95-100; b) A. M. Vandenbroucke, R. Morent, N. D.
Geyter, C. Leys, J. Hazard. Mater., 2011, 195, 30-54.
4
reaction. It is, therefore, likely that an alternative methane
activation pathway is in operation, having a lower activation
barrier than the thermal activation reaction. As noted the rate
limiting step for the thermal reaction over Pd is the formation of
[8]
a) T. Nozakia, K. Okazaki, Catal. Today, 2013, 211, 29-38; b) P. J.
Bruggeman, N. Sadeghi, D. C. Schram, V. Linss, Plasma Sources Sci.
Technol., 2014, 23, 023001-023033; c) H. J. Gallona, X. Tua, M. V.
Twigg, J. C. Whitehead, Appl. Catal., B, 2011, 106, 616-620; d) A.
Ricard, C. Nouvellon, S. Konstantinidis, J. P. Dauchot, M. Wautelet,
and M. Hecq, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A, 2002, 20, 1488-1491; e) B.
Twomey, A. Nindrayog K. Niemi, W. G. Graham, D. P. Dowling, Plasma
Chem. Plasma Process., 2011, 31, 139-156.
o
the CH3(a) + H(a). This is found above 227 C whereas carbon
o
[3]
oxidation is rate limiting below 227 C. Interestingly, the major
effect of the plasma on methane has recently been reported to
[
14]
be the formation of CH3(g) via electron impact reactions. Given
the fact the nanoparticle temperatures are approximately at the
[9]
a) J. C. Whitehead, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., 2016, 49, 243001-243025;
b) H.-H. Kim, Y. Teramoto, A. Ogata, H. Takagi, T. Nanba, Plasma
Chem. Plasma Process., 2016, 36, 45-72.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.