S. Yamada, N. Koga / Thermochimica Acta 431 (2005) 38–43
43
Table 1
Summary of the apparent kinetic parameters evaluated for the reactions under various controlled reaction atmosphere
Controlled reaction atmosphere
From Eq. (2) Ea (kJ mol−1
)
From (dα/dθ) vs. m(1 − α)[−ln(1 − α)]1−1/m plot
CO2 (g m−3
)
H2O (g m−3
)
m
A (s−1
)
γa
0.1
0.3
0.1
a
1.2
1.2
111.5 4.8
78.5 3.0
109.6 5.2
1.25
1.15
1.30
(1.29 0.01) × 1011
(9.19 0.08) × 106
(1.65 0.02) × 1011
0.9981
0.9977
0.9971
Correlation coefficient of the linear regression analysis.
Combining Eqs. (1) and (3), the following equation is de-
rived [12,13–15].
gases in the reaction atmosphere influence differently on the
rate behavior of the thermal decomposition. As is expected
from the chemical equilibrium of the reaction, the reaction
rate of the forward reaction is decelerated apparently by the
atmospheric CO2. On the other hand, opposite effect was ob-
served for the atmospheric H2O which enhances the reaction
rate within the range of H2O concentration examined in the
present study.
CREGA-TG was successfully applied for measuring the
kinetic rate data under a quantitatively controlled condition of
reaction atmosphere including the self-generated conditions.
The rate behavior of the thermal decomposition was charac-
terized apparently by a kinetic equation of Avrami–Erofeev
type, where the appropriate kinetic exponent decreased and
increased by the effects of atmospheric CO2 and H2O, re-
spectively. The enhancement of the reactivity by the effect
of atmospheric H2O was expressed by the increase in the
value of A without any practical change in the value of Ea.
The normal effect of chemical equilibrium observed for the
effect of atmospheric CO2, i.e., the decrease in the reac-
tion rate, appeared as the decreases in both the values of
Ea and A.
dα
= Af (α)
(4)
dθ
By plotting dα/dθ against f(α), a straight line with slope
A is obtained when an appropriate function of f(␣) was
applied for the plot. Through plotting dα/dθ against vari-
ous f(α) for the reactions under three different controlled
atmospheric conditions, Avrami–Erofeev model [16], i.e.
f(α) = m(1 − α)[−ln(1 − α)]1 − 1/m with the values of m close
to unity, was selected as the most appropriate kinetic model
function. Although the apparent fit to the Avrami–Erofeev
model derived originally for the nucleation and growth type
reaction should be further investigated from the physico-
geometrical view points [10], the empirical fitting to a partic-
ular kinetic model enable us to determine the apparent value
of A and to compare the values among the series of reactions
under investigation.
Table 1 summarizes the apparent kinetic parameters eval-
uated for the reactions under three different controlled atmo-
sphere. The change in the rate behavior at the second half
of the reaction depending on the atmospheric condition is
reflected apparently by the change in the kinetic exponent
action temperature at a restricted reaction rate depending on
the atmospheric condition observed as the changes in the
temperature profiles of the CREGA-TG measurements, see
Figs. 3 and 4, can be expressed by the changes in the value
of A. Unexpected decrease in the reaction temperature with
increasing the atmospheric H2O concentration from 1.2 to
3.2 g m−3 appears as the increase in the value of A without
any practical change in Ea. As for the increase in the reaction
temperature with increasing the CO2 concentration from 0.1
to 0.3 g m−3, the value of A decreases drastically, but the ef-
fect of the large decrease in A on the reaction temperature is
compensated partially by the decrease in Ea.
References
[1] N. Koga, J.M. Criado, H. Tanaka, Thermochim. Acta 340/341 (1999)
387.
[2] N. Koga, J.M. Criado, H. Tanaka, J. Thermal Anal. Calor. 60 (2000)
943.
[3] N. Koga, S. Yamada, Int. J. Chem. Kinet., in press.
[4] J. Rouquerol, Thermochim. Acta 2 (1970) 123.
[5] J. Rouquerol, Thermochim. Acta 300 (1997) 247.
[6] O.T. Sorensen, J. Rouquerol (Eds.), Sample Controlled Thermal
Analysis, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 2004.
[7] N. Koga, J.M. Criado, Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 30 (1998) 737.
[8] N. Koga, J. Malek, J. Sestak, H. Tanaka, Netsu Sokutei 20 (1993)
210.
[9] N. Koga, Thermochim. Acta 244 (1994) 1.
[10] N. Koga, H. Tanaka, Thermochim. Acta 388 (2002) 41.
[11] H. Tanaka, N. Koga, J. Thermal Anal. 36 (1990) 2601.
[12] T. Ozawa, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 38 (1965) 1881.
[13] T. Ozawa, Thermochim. Acta 100 (1986) 109.
[14] F.J. Gotor, J.M. Criado, J. Malek, N. Koga, J. Phys. Chem. A 104
(2000) 10777.
[15] N. Koga, Thermochim. Acta 258 (1995) 145.
[16] J. Sestak, Thermophysical Properties of Solids, Elsevier, Amsterdam,
1984.
4. Conclusion
The reaction rate behavior of the thermal decomposition
of NaHCO3, which evolves CO2 and H2O simultaneously, is
influenced sensitively by the atmospheric CO2 and H2O in-
cludingtheself-generatedthesegases. Therespectiveproduct