168
K.K. Kartha et al. / Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical 335 (2011) 158–168
sites resulted increased reducibility with decreased Tmax observed
in TPR profile of LF(0.4)SS. Studies investigated by Mössbauer
spectroscopy also corroborate these results wherein asymme-
try around the Fe3+ ions imparted by nonstoichiometry-induced
anionic vacancies is clearly evident (Fig. 4d) and are responsi-
ble for maximum conversion of 100% at 550 ◦C observed over
LF(0.4)SS. In case of samples prepared by gel combustion, surface
surface area. This suggests that along with enhanced adsorption
active sites on the surface, crystal structure also plays an impor-
tant role in deciding their catalytic properties. While modified bulk
properties, like maximum asymmetric distortion around Fe3+ atom,
in nonstoichiometric LF(0.4)SS sample has maximized its activity
for both the reactions.
Reaction mechanism investigated by in situ FTIR studies by the
authors over these samples for the decomposition of N2O using CO
is recently published elsewhere [9].
area is greatly enhanced, particularly in LF(0.4)GC (∼68 m2 g−1
)
and LF(0.6)GC (∼47 m2 g−1), both are active but LF(0.6)GC shows
maximum activity as against their surface area trend. This sug-
gests that along with enhanced adsorption active sites on the
surface, crystal structure also plays an important role in decid-
ing their catalytic properties. Both LF(0.4)GC and LF(0.6)GC are
crystalline. An increased crystallinity ensures easy diffusion path of
lattice oxygen via anionic vacancies properly generated in nonsto-
ichiometric LF(0.6)GC sample. The Mössbauer spectroscopy results
also show that the hyperfine field (Hhf) increased progressively,
increase in Tmax from LF(0.6)SS to LFOSS sample (Fig. 6d and f,
respectively) may be attributed to increase in symmetric order-
ing of Fe in case of higher substituted LF(0.8)SS sample, as evident
by Mössbauer results (Fig. 3) resulting in decreased catalytic
activity of single phased crystalline LF(0.8)SS and LFOSS sam-
ples as compared to LF(0.4)SS. Thus, enhanced catalytic activity of
LF(0.6)GC is attributed to more active LaFeO3 phase with increased
surface area. While modified bulk properties, like maximum
asymmetric distortion around Fe3+ atom, enhanced reducibility
and substitution-induced anionic vacancies in nonstoichiometric
LF(0.4)SS sample has maximized its activity for both the reac-
tions.
References
[1] J. Canales Vázquez, S.W. Tao, J.T.S. Irvine, Solid State Ionics 159 (2003) 159–
165.
[2] W.F. Libby, Science 171 (1971) 499–500.
[3] M.M. Milanova, M. Kakihana, M. Arima, M. Yashima, M. Yoshimura, J. Alloys
Compd. 242 (1996) 6–10.
[4] J. Happel, M.A. Hnatow, L. Bajars, M. Kundrath, Ind. Eng. Chem. Prod. Res. Dev.
14 (1975) 154–158.
[5] J.G. MacChesney, H.A. Sauer, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 45 (1962) 416–422.
[6] D.W. Hwang, H.G. Kim, J.S. Lee, J. Kim, W. Li, S.H. Oh, J. Phys. Chem. B 109 (2005)
2093–2102.
[7] J. Canales-Vazquez, J.C. Ruiz-Morales, J.T.S. Irvine, W. Zhou, J. Electrochem. Soc.
152 (7) (2005) A1458–A1465.
[8] C. Brink, C. Kroeze, Z. Klimont, Atmos. Environ. 35 (2001) 6299–6312.
[9] M.R. Pai, A.M. Banerjee, K. Kartha, R.V. Pai, V.S. Kamble, S.R. Bharadwaj, J Phys.
Chem. B 114 (2010) 6943–6953.
[10] F. Kapteijn, J.R. Mirasol, J.A. Moulijn, Appl. Catal. B 9 (1996) 25–64.
[11] P. Pomonis, D. Vatts, A. Lycourghiotis, C. Kordulis, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans.
1 81 (1985) 2043–2051.
[12] A.K. Ladavos, P.J. Pomonis, Appl. Catal. B 2 (1993) 27–47.
[13] R.J.H. Voorhoeve, D.W. Johnson, J.P. Remeika, P.K. Gallagher, Science 195 (1977)
827–833.
[14] L.G. Tejuca, J.L.G. Fierro, J.M.D. Tascon, Adv. Catal. 36 (1989) 237–328.
[15] H. Tanaka, M. Misono, Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 5 (2001) 381–387.
[16] C.S. Swamy, J. Christopher, Catal. Rev. Sci. Eng. 34 (1992) 409–425.
[17] B. Viswanathan, Catal. Rev. Sci. Eng. 34 (1992) 337–352.
[18] M.R. Pai, A.M. Banerjee, S.R. Bharadwaj, S.K. Kulshreshtha, J. Mater. Res. 22
(2007) 1787–1796.
[19] M.R. Pai, B.N. Wani, N.M. Gupta, J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 21 (2002) 1187–1190.
[20] M.R. Pai, B.N. Wani, N.M. Gupta, J. Chem. Phys. Solids 67 (2006) 1502–1509.
[21] M.R. Pai, B.N. Wani, A.D. Belapurkar, N.M. Gupta, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 223
(2004) 275–283.
[22] M.R. Pai, B.N. Wani, B. Shreedhar, S. Singh, N.M. Gupta, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem.
246 (2006) 128–135.
[23] A.M. Banerjee, M.R. Pai, K. Bhattacharya, A.K. Tripathi, V.S. Kamble, S.R. Bharad-
waj, S.K. Kulshreshtha, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 33 (2008) 319–326.
[24] X.-H. Huang, J. Chang, Mater. Chem. Phys. 115 (2009) 1–4.
[25] Z. Qiu, Y. Zhou, M. Lu, A. Zhang, Q. Ma, Solid State Sci. 10 (2008) 629–633.
[26] H. Taguchi, Y. Masunaga, K. Hirota, O. Yamaguchi, Mater. Res. Bull. 40 (2005)
773–780.
[27] R.A. Nyquist, R.O. Kajel, Infrared Spectra of Inorganic Compounds, Academic
Press, New York, 1971.
[28] D. Chen, X. Jiao, R. Xu, Mater. Res. Bull. 34 (1999) 685–691.
[29] J.T. Last, Phys. Rev. 105 (1957) 1740–1750.
4. Conclusion
Role of surface/bulk properties on catalyst performance was
emphasized in the present study by applying both citrate com-
bustion synthesis and conventional routes of synthesis. Here,
replacement of Ti4+ by lower valence Fe3+ cation, created anionic
vacancies that might favor lattice oxygen mobility and activity.
Combustion route helped in achieving single phase, nanosized
porous LF(0.4)GC and LF(0.6)GC samples at 800 ◦C in contrast
to 1400 ◦C required for solid state synthesis. Fe substitution led
to considerable rise in surface areas of order of ∼68 m2 g−1 and
∼47 m2 g−1 in LF(0.4)GC and LF(0.6)GC samples accompanied with
˚
formation of pores of 20–30 A radius, as compared to unsubstituted,
[30] U. Balachandran, N.G. Eror, J. Mater. Res. 4 (1989) 1525–1528.
[31] M.T. Paques-Ledent, Spectrochim. Acta Part A 32 (1976) 1339–1344.
[32] P. Tarte, Spectrochim. Acta Part A 23 (1967) 2127–2143.
[33] W. Zheng, R. Liu, D. Peng, G. Meng, Mater. Lett. 43 (2000) 19–22.
[34] M. Abdelmola, M. Petitjean, G. Caboche, J.-M. Genin, L.C. Dufour, Hyperfine
Interact. 156/157 (2004) 299–303.
[35] N.S. Gajbhiye, S. Bhattacharya, G. Balaji, R.S. Ningthoujam, R. Kumar Das, S.
Basak, J. Weissmuller, Hyperfine Interact. 165 (2005) 153–159.
[36] M.R. Pai, K.K. Kartha, A.M. Banerjee, A. Bokare, R. Tewari, G.K. Dey, V.S. Kamble,
S.R. Bharadwaj, 19th National Symposium on Catalysis (CATSYMP-19), held at
National Chemical Laboratory, Pune, India, during Jan 18–21, 2009.
sample, LTOGC with poor surface area of ∼12 m2 g−1. The increase
in Tmax from LF(0.6)SS to LFOSS (Fig. 6d and f, respectively) may be
attributed to increase in symmetric ordering of Fe in case of higher
substituted LF(0.8)SS, as evident by Mössbauer results (Fig. 4) also
manifested in their lower catalytic activity. Among all samples, the
maximum conversion of 100% occurred over LF(0.6)GC at ∼395 ◦C
for CO + N2O and at ∼325 ◦C for CO oxidation reaction. In conclu-
sion we may state that enhanced catalytic activity of LF(0.6)GC is
attributed to nonstoichiometric single LaFeO3 phase with higher