LETTER
4 but gave higher ees than for the corresponding phenyl-
ations in all cases (entries 4–6). Triethylamine was found
to be the base of choice, giving the highest ee and yield
with this particular ligand (49% yield of 24 and 61% ee,
entry 4).
The Application of HETPHOX Ligands
109
2
(7) Gilbertson, S. R.; Fu, Z.; Xie, D. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42,
65.
8) Hashimoto, Y.; Horie, Y.; Hayashi, M.; Saigo, K.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2000, 11, 2205.
9) Tu, T.; Deng, W.-P.; Hou, X.-L.; Dai, L.-X.; Dong, X.-C.
Chem.–Eur. J. 2003, 9, 3073.
3
(
(
(
(
10) Kilroy, T. G.; Hennessy, A. J.; Malone, Y. M.; Farrell, A.;
Guiry, P. J. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2003, 196, 65.
11) (a) Hennessy, A. J.; Malone, Y. M.; Farrell, A.; Guiry, P. J.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 9163. (b) Hennessy, A. J.;
Malone, Y. M.; Farrell, A.; Guiry, P. J. Tetrahedron Lett.
Using ligand 12, the highest yield of the major regioiso-
mer 23 was obtained with proton sponge as base of 49%
(
entry 8) but the highest ee obtained was using triethyl-
amine as base of 55% (entry 7). A substantial drop in yield
to 13% of 23 was observed when diisopropylamine was
used as base, although little effect was seen with the ee
2000, 41, 2261. (c) Hennessy, A. J.; Connolly, D. J.;
Malone, Y. M.; Farrell, A.; Guiry, P. J. Tetrahedron Lett.
2000, 41, 7757.
(
entry 9). Once again the ligand 10 gave the best results
with ees in the range 89–97% and yields 69–96% (entries
0–12). The optimum result with this ligand was using tri-
(12) (a) Kiely, D.; Guiry, P. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 9545.
(b) Kiely, D.; Guiry, P. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 7377.
1
(
(
13) Kündig, P. E.; Meier, P. Helv. Chim. Acta 1999, 82, 1360.
14) Malkov, A. V.; Bella, M.; Stara, I. G.; Kocovsky, P.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 3045.
ethylamine as base and this gave (R)-2-cyclohex-1¢-en-1¢-
yl-2,5-dihydrofuran (23) in 96% yield and 97% ee after 7
days (entry 10).
(
15) (a) Tietze, L. F.; Thede, K.; Sannicolò, F. Chem. Commun.
1
999, 1811. (b) Tietze, L. F.; Thede, K. Synlett 2000, 1470.
In conclusion, we have prepared two new HETPHOX
ligands (11, 12) and applied a series of thiophene- and
benzothiophene-oxazoline containing ligands in the inter-
molecular asymmetric Heck phenylation and cyclohex-
enylation of 2,3-dihydrofuran (1). Although most ligands
performed satisfactorily in this transformation, ligand 10
was the ligand of choice, giving the highest yields, regio-
selectivities and enantioselectivities, irrespective of the
base employed. Further studies are now in progress with
other substrates using these ligands and the results of
these investigations will be reported in due course.22
(
(
(
16) Tietze, L. F.; Lohmann, J. K. Synlett 2002, 2083.
17) Cozzi, P. G.; Menges, F.; Kaiser, S. Synlett 2003, 833.
18) Typical Experimental Procedure for the Preparation of
2-(2-Diphenylphosphino)-benzo[b]thiophene-3-yl-4S-
phenyl-4,5-dihydrooxazole (11).
To a solution of the benzo[b]thiophene-oxazoline (1.0 g,
3.58 mmol) in Et O (10 mL) at –78 °C a solution of 1.6 M
2
BuLi in hexane (2.3 mL, 3.70 mmol) were added and the
resulting suspension was agitated at –78 °C for 1 h and 30
min. Diphenylchlorophosphine (0.62 mL, 3.36 mmol) was
added at –78 °C and the reaction mixture was warmed at r.t.
and stirred for 30 min. The reaction was quenched by adding
pentane (40 mL) and H O (30 mL). The organic phase was
2
separated and dried over Na SO and purified by chromato-
2
4
Acknowledgement
graphy (hexane:Et O, 9:1). Yield 78%; [a] –5.4 (c 0.92,
2
D
1
CHCl ). H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl ): d = 3.96 (dd, 1 H,
J = 8.3, 8.8 Hz), 4.56 (dd, 1 H, J = 8.3, 10.3 Hz), 5.34 (dd, 1
H, J = 8.8, 10.3 Hz), 7.04–7.09 (m, 2 H), 7.22–7.52 (m, 15
T. G. K. thanks Enterprise Ireland for the award of a Research
Scholarship (BR/99/240) and Merck Sharp and Dohme (Ireland) for
their support of our asymmetric Heck research.
3
3
1
3
H), 7.58–7.72 (m, 1 H), 8.60–8.66 (m, 1 H). C NMR (75
MHz, CDCl ): d = 70.1, 74.1, 121.7, 125.0, 125.1, 125.3,
3
References
126.9, 127.5, 127.8, 128.7, 128.8 (d, J = 7.7 Hz), 129.6 (d,
J = 10.9 Hz), 133.9 (d, J = 21.3 Hz), 134.3 (d, J = 21.3 Hz),
(
1) For extensive reviews of the Heck reaction see: (a) Heck,
R. F. Acc. Chem. Res. 1979, 146. (b) De Meijere, A.;
Meyer, F. E. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1994, 28, 2379.
1
37.0 (J = 20.6 Hz), 137.2 (d, J = 16.6 Hz), 139.8, 142.0,
31
142.6, 148.9 (d, J = 42.8 Hz), 161.3. P (124 MHz, CDCl ):
3
+
d = –12.4. MS (EI): m/z (%) = 463 (4) [M ], 358 (100), 296
(
(
c) Cabri, W.; Candiani, I. Acc. Chem. Res. 1995, 28, 2.
d) Guiry, P. J.; Hennessy, A. J.; Cahill, J. P. Top. Catal.
(
12) and 239 (18).
Typical Experimental Procedure for the Preparation of
1997, 4, 311. (e) Jeffrey, T. Advances in Metal-Organic
4-iso-Propyl-2-(3-diphenylphosphino-thiophene-2-yl)-
Chemistry, Vol 5; JAI Press Inc.: Conneticut, 1996, 153.
2) Ozawa, F.; Kubo, A.; Hayashi, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992,
4,5-dihydrooxazole (12).
(
(
Thiophene-2-oxazoline (0.418 g, 2.14 mmol) was dissolved
33, 1485.
in Et O (5 mL) and the resultant solution was cooled at –78
2
3) (a) Hennessy, A. J.; Malone, Y. M.; Guiry, P. J. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2000, 41, 2261. (b) Ozawa, F.; Kubo, A.; Matsumoto,
Y.; Hayashi, T. Organometallics 1993, 12, 4188.
°
C. A solution of 2.5 M n-BuLi in hexane (1.6 mL, 4 mmol)
was added dropwise and the yellow solution was stirred at
78 °C for 30 min. The reaction was warmed up at 0 °C and
–
(
c) Tschoerner, M.; Pregosin, P. S.; Albinati, A.
stirred at this temperature for 30 min. The yellow-green
Organometallics 1999, 18, 670. (d) Tietze, L. F.; Thede, K.;
Sannicolò, F. Chem. Commun. 1999, 1811. (e) Cho, S. Y.;
Shibisaki, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 1773.
solution was finally cooled to –78 °C then ClPPh (0.74 mL,
2
4
mmol) was added. The reaction was allowed to warm to r.t.
during 20 h and then quenched with H O. The phases were
2
(
f) Loiseleur, O.; Hayashi, M.; Schmees, N.; Pfaltz, A.
separated and the aqueous phase was extracted with Et O
2
Synthesis 1997, 1338. (g) Ozawa, F.; Kobatake, Y.;
Hayashi, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, 34, 2505. (h) Ozawa,
F.; Hayashi, T. J. Organomet. Chem. 1992, 428, 267.
4) Loiseleur, O.; Meier, O.; Pfaltz, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
Engl. 1996, 35, 200.
(
2 × 5 mL) the the organic phases were combined, dried over
Na SO and evaporated under reduced pressure to give an oil
then was purified by chromatography (cyclohexane: Et O,
9
2
4
2
(
:1) to give a clear oil that slowly turned into a waxy white
1
solid, yield 34%; [a] –99.0 (c 0.99, CHCl ). H NMR (300
D
3
(
(
5) Gilbertson, S. R.; Fu, Z. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 161.
6) Gilbertson, S. R.; Xie, D.; Fu, Z. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66,
MHz, CDCl ): d = 0.71 (d, 1 H, J = 6.6 Hz), 0.74 (d, 3 H,
3
J = 6.6 Hz), 1.6 (m, 1 H), 3.92 (q, 1 H, J = 7.8 Hz), 4.02 (q,
7420.
Synlett 2004, No. 1, 106–110 © Thieme Stuttgart · New York