Chemistry Letters 2001
265
temperature of AlCl3 (mp = 463 K) which might be formed during
the chlorination reaction.10 After reaction, Pt/SrCO3 and Pt/MgO
also showed the change in the phase of supports from oxides to
chlorides such as SrCl2 and MgCl2·6H2O as observed XRD.
Despite this change, two catalysts showed stable catalyst activity
and product distribution at 723 K for more than 30 h. These chlo-
rides have high melting points, 987 K for MgCl2 and 1146 K for
SrCl2. In any case, platinum supported on SiO2, MgO, SrCO3 and
MgAl2O4 showed stable CCl4 conversions and could become can-
didate catalysts for a novel disposal process of ozone-depleting
CCl4 by disproportionation with CH4. Supported platinum cata-
lysts could be classified into two groups according to their prod-
ucts distribution shown in Figure 1. Pt/carbon, Pt/SrCO3, and
Pt/SiO2 showed the selectivity of CH3Cl close to 50% and compa-
rable amounts of CHCl3. Substantial amounts of C2 products
were also formed over Pt/SrCO3, and Pt/SiO2. Other catalysts
produced predominantly CH3Cl. In particular, Pt/MgAl2O4, and
Pt/Al2O3 catalysts exhibited CH3Cl selectivity values higher than
90%. An ideal disproportionation of CCl4 with CH4 should have
the following stoichiometry:
pathway should be more complicated than indicated by equations 1
and 2. As chlorine content increases in chloromethanes, the contri-
bution of CCl4 increases (30% for CH2Cl2 and 60% for CHCl3).
C2Cl4 comes exclusively from CCl4. Thus the reaction on the cata-
lyst surface is very complicated comprising reactions 1 and 2 and
others. As mentioned, dissociative adsorption of CCl4 is facile
under the current reaction conditions. The selectivity to CH3Cl
depends on the availability of adsorbed CH3 species on the surface.
When chlorine from adsorbed CCl4 is readily picked up by the CH3
species, dominant formation of CH3Cl results. Otherwise, more
chlorinated chloromethanes or dimers are preferentially formed due
to the extended residence of adsorbed CCl4 species on the catalyst
surface. This overall picture is consistent with the product distribu-
tion in Figure 1 and the amounts of methane adsorption in Figure 2.
A study of detailed reaction mechanism and optimization of reac-
tion conditions are underway.
The first group of catalyst, Pt/carbon in particular, appears to
follow this route. However, we have to consider other stoi-
chiometries in order to account for the dominant formation of
CH3Cl over the second group catalysts such as;
References
1
2
M. J. Molina and F. S. Rowland, Nature, 249, 810 (1974).
S. Imamura, H. Tarumoto, and S. Ishida, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.,
28, 1449 (1989).
3
4
5
6
A. H. Weiss, B. S. Gambhir, and R. B. Leon, J. Catal., 22, 245
(1971).
C. Dogimont, J. Franklin, F. Janssens, and J. P. Schoebrechts,
U.S. Patent 5146013 (1992).
S. Y. Kim, H. C. Choi, O. B. Yang, K. H. Lee, J. S. Lee, and Y.
G. Kim, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1995, 2169.
H. C. Choi, S. H. Choi, J. S. Lee, K. H. Lee, and Y. G. Kim, J.
Catal., 166, 284 (1997).
Z. C. Zhang and B. C. Beard, Appl. Catal. A, 174, 33 (1998).
N. Kitajima and J. Schwartz, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 106, 2220
(1984).
Figure 2 compares temperature-programmed oxidation
(TPO) of adsorbed CH4 on fresh Pt/SiO2 and Pt/MgAl2O4 repre-
senting each group of catalysts. The catalyst (500 mg) was reduced
at 773 K and purged in He flow at 873 K prior to CH4 adsorption at
723 K. Then, TPO was executed with a ramping rate of 10 K/mim
from 323 K to 1173 K. On Pt/MgAl2O4 showing a high selectivity
to CH3Cl, a larger amount of a more reactive carbonaceous species
is present compared to Pt/SiO2. CO2 evolution temperature was as
low as around 750 K. It appears that facile dissociative adsorption
of CH4 promotes the selective formation of CH3Cl. CCl4 could
adsorb dissociatively on any supported platinum at a temperature as
low as 323 K.14 In order to investigate the source of carbon in each
product, the reaction of labeled 13CH4 with CCl4 was studied over
1.0 wt%Pt/ MgAl2O4 with 4CH4/CCl4. As shown in Table 2, most
(ca. 85%) of CH3Cl originates from methane. This higher value
than expected from equation 2 (75%) suggested that the reaction
7
8
9
G. A. Olah, Acc. Chem. Res., 20, 422 (1987).
10 I. Bucsi and G. A. Olah, Catal. Lett., 16, 27 (1992).
11 P. Batamack, I. Bucsi, A. Molnar, and G. A. Olah, Catal. Lett.,
25, 11 (1994).
12 G. C. Rudershausen, European Patent 0306566 (1989).
13 K. Li, E. Kennedy, B. Dlugogorski, and R. Howe, Chem.
Commun., 1999, 709.
14 J. W. Bae, E. D. Park, J. S. Lee, K. H. Lee, Y. G. Kim, S. H.
Yeon, and B. H. Sung, Appl. Catal. A, in press.