C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Table 1. Enantioselective Three Component Reduction of Cyclic 1,3-Diketones
a Based on 90% conversion. b The B-H oxazaborolidine was used as catalyst rather than the B-n-Bu reagent 6. c Based on 85% conversion.
sterically less screened lone electron pair of the carbonyl oxygen,
steric repulsion is minimized, and the nucleophilic hydride is at-
tached to the carbonyl carbon at the sterically more accessible face.
Our new reduction method is more broadly applicable to the
enantioselective reduction of achiral 1,3-diketones, which previously
had only been realized by the use of enzymic processes such as
fermenting yeast reduction.6 Five examples of the enantioselective
reduction of cyclic 1,3-diketones are summarized in Table 1.
Excellent enantioselectivities were observed with 5, 6, and 8-mem-
bered substrates, and yields of chiral â-hydroxyketone generally
were good (entries 1-3 and 5).7 The principal byproduct in each
case was the 1,3-diol produced by further reduction of the initially
formed â-hydroxyketone. The reduction of 2,2-dimethylcyclohep-
tan-1,3-dione (entry 4) was both slower and less enantioselective
than that of the other substrates in Table 1. The absolute configura-
tions of the products of entries 28 and 39 were determined by
comparison of optical rotation of each product with the value
reported previously. The absolute configurations for the products
of entries 1, 4, and 5 were assigned by analogy with the three
examples reported (3 f 5 and Table 1, entries 2 and 3) and from
the application of mechanistic model implicit in the pre-transition-
state assembly 10.
Acknowledgment. R.-J. Chein is the recipient of a Taiwan Merit
Scholarship.
Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures and
characterization data for all compounds; X-ray crystal structure of 5.
This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://
pubs.acs.org.
References
(1) Ananchenko, S. N.; Torgov, I. V. Tetrahedron Lett. 1963, 4, 1553-1558.
(2) See, also: Ananchenko, S. N.; Limanov, V. Y.; Leonov, V. N.;
Rzheznikov, V. N.; Torgov, I. V. Tetrahedron 1962, 18, 1355-1367.
(3) For total syntheses of estrogens see: (a) Zeelen, F. J. Nat. Prod. Rep.
1994, 11, 607-612. (b) Groen, M. B.; Zeelen, F. J. Recl. TraV. Chim.
Pays-Bas 1986, 105, 465-487. For recent examples, see: (c) Rigby, J.
H.; Warshakoon, N. C.; Payen, A. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 8237-
8245. (d) Tietze, L. F.; Nobel, T.; Spescha, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998,
120, 8971-8977. (e) Tanaka, K.; Nakashima, H.; Taniguchi, T.; Ogasawara,
K. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 1915-1917. (f) Hanada, K.; Miyazawa, N.;
Ogasawara, K. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2003, 51, 104-106. (g) Tsogoeva, S.
B.; Durner, G.; Bolte, M.; Gobel, M. W. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 1661-
1664. (h) Enev, V. S.; Mohr, J.; Harre, M.; Nickisch, K. Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry 1998, 9, 2693-2699. (i) Soorukram, D.; Knochel, P. Org.
Lett. 2007, 9, 1021-1023.
(4) Hu, Q.-Y.; Rege, P. D.; Corey, E. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 5984-
5986.
(5) Corey, E. J.; Helal, C. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 1986-2012.
(6) See: Jones, J. B. Tetrahedron 1986, 42, 3351-3403.
(7) Enantioselectivities for the reduction products of Table 1 were determined
by 1H NMR analysis of the Mosher MTPA esters except for entry 1 which
was analyzed by HPLC using a Chiral Technologies OD column. Full
details appear in the Supporting Information.
The new methodology for the enantioselective reduction of cyclic
achiral 1,3-diketones provides an alternative to the use of fermenting
yeast reduction which suffers from a number of drawbacks,
including the need to use large reaction volumes, troublesome
foaming and copious evolution of CO2 and, finally, difficulties in
extracting water-soluble products.
(8) Lee, S.-F.; Barth, G.; Djerassi, C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103, 295-
301.
(9) Ema, T.; Yagasaki, H.; Okita, N.; Takeda, M.; Sakai, T. Tetrahedron 2006,
62, 6143-6149.
We are currently exploring other applications of the new three-
component process.
JA0742434
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 129, NO. 34, 2007 10347