S.P. Borikar, T. Daniel / Ultrasonics Sonochemistry 18 (2011) 928–931
929
CH3
CH3
Br
CH3
Table 1
RBr
97% H SO
2
4
The effect of the amount of ILs on the yield of product 2a under ultrasound
irradiation.
HSO4
90 oC, 5h
Reflux
N
N
Bu
N
Bu
DCM, 48h
Entry
Substrate/IL, molar ratio
Time (min)
Yield (%)a
1
2
3
1:0.05
1:0.1
1:0.2
7
5
4
92
97
86
Scheme 1. Preparation of 1-butyl-3-methylpyridinium hydrogen sulphate
[bmpy]HSO ).
(
4
a
The yields refer to the isolated products.
O
Table 2
Acylals reaction of benzaldehyde with acetic anhydride in various solvents.
1
0 mol% IL
OCH3
OCH3
R
R-CHO + Ac O
2
o
Solventa
Yield (%)b
Entry
Time (min)
)
)))), 30
C
1
2
3
4
5
Dichloromethane
Diethylether
Ethyl acetate
DMF
15
25
30
25
5
75
55
60
56
97
O
1
2
R = aryl and alkyl
Solvent-free
a
Scheme 2. Conversion of aldehydes to acylals under ultrasonic irradiation.
The reaction was carried out in 2 mL of solvents under ultrasonic irradiation.
The yields refer to the isolated products.
b
E4) at 50 kHz. Acetic anhydride was distilled before use. Thin layer
chromatography was carried out using silica 60F-245 plates. The
2.2.2. Compound 2c
1
13
H and C NMR spectras were recorded in CDCl
3
using a Bruker
1,1-Diacetoxy-1-(3-nitrophenyl) methane, faint yellow solid,
1
AVANCE 200 (200 MHz) spectrometer using TMS as internal stan-
dard. Melting points were determined using a Büchi 535 melting
point apparatus. Mass spectra were obtained using Shimadzu
GCMS-QP 5050 with electron impact ionization.
m.p. 64–65 °C; H NMR (200 MHz, CDCl ): d 8.40 (t, J = 7.96 Hz,
3
1H), 8.25 (d, J = 8.21 Hz, 1H), 7.82 (d, J = 7.70 Hz, 1H), 7.73 (s,
1H), 7.61 (t, J = 7.96 Hz, 1H), 2.16 (s, 6H). C NMR (50 MHz, CDCl ):
d 168.51, 148.22, 137.42, 132.86, 129.69, 124.46, 121.76, 88.23,
1
3
3
2
0.63 ppm.
2
.1. Preparation of 1-butyl-3-methylpyridinium hydrogen sulphate
2
.2.3. Compound 2f
(
[BMPy]HSO ) ionic liquid
4
1
,1-Diacetoxy-1-(4-bromophenyl) methane, white solid, m.p.
1
9
3
2–94 °C; H NMR (200 MHz, CDCl ): d 7.63 (s, 1H), 7.53 (d,
To a stirred solution of [bmpy]Br (5.0 g, 86.9 mmol) in 25 mL
dry CH Cl at 0 °C was added dropwise 97% H SO (1.15 mL,
6.9 mmol) over 10 min. The resulting solution was refluxed for
8 h. The solution was washed with water (3 ꢁ 5 mL) and dried
SO . The solvent CH Cl was distilled off under reduced
pressure to give pure IL [bmpy]HSO as a blackish viscous liquid
13
J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.38 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 2.13 (s, 6H). C NMR
50 MHz, CDCl ): d 168.57, 134.39, 131.68, 128.32, 123.83, 88.99,
0.69 ppm.
2
2
2
4
(
2
3
8
4
over Na
2
4
2
2
2
.2.4. Compound 2j
,1-Diacetoxy-3-phenylprop-2-ene, white solid, m.p. 85–86 °C;
H NMR (200 MHz, CDCl ): d 7.39 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 1H), 7.28–7.34
4
1
(
5.3 g; 98.7%).
1
3
(
2
m, 5H), 6.83 (d, J = 15.4 Hz, 1H), 6.24 (dd, J = 15.4, 6.80 Hz, 1H),
1
3
3
.15 (s, 6H). C NMR (50 MHz, CDCl ): d 168.59, 135.59, 135.21,
2
.2. General procedure for the synthesis of acylals under ultrasonic
1
28.82, 128.66, 127.03, 121.83, 89.76, 20.85 ppm.
irradiations
2
.2.5. Compound 2o
,1-Diacetoxy-piparane, white solid, m.p. 78–79 °C; 1H NMR
200 MHz, CDCl ): d 7.56 (s, 1H), 6.95–7.02 (m, 2H), 6.82 (d,
J = 8.46 Hz, 1H), 5.98 (s, 2H), 2.11 (s, 6H). C NMR (50 MHz,
CDCl ): d 168.46, 148.48, 147.65, 129.09, 120.68, 107.88, 106.70,
01.19, 89.40, 20.54 ppm.
A solution of aldehyde 1 (1.0 mmol) in freshly distilled Ac
3.0 mmol) was sonicated under ultrasound irradiation in the pres-
ence of a catalytic amount of [bmpy][HSO ] (10 mol%) at room
2
O
1
(
(
3
4
1
3
temperature. The mixture was irradiated for the period as indi-
cated in Table 2. The completion of reaction was monitored by
TLC (n-hexane–EtOAc, 9:1). After the completion of the reaction,
3
1
water was added and extracted with CH
2 2
Cl , washed with aq. NaH-
CO and dried over Na SO . The solvent was removed by evapora-
3
2
4
3. Results and discussion
tion under reduced pressure to afford the corresponding crude
products 2, which was then purified by column chromatography
on silica gel. The pure products were characterized by spectral data
In order to improve the yield, the effects of the catalyst on the
reaction of benzaldehyde with acetic anhydride were examined
under ultrasound irradiation. As shown in Table 1, when the molar
ratio of substrate to IL was increased from 1:0.05 to 1:0.1, higher
yield (97%) was achieved in approximately the same reaction time
1
13
(
H NMR and C NMR) and their physical characteristics were
compared with the literature data. The spectral data for some
products are given below:
(
Entry 2). When the molar ratio was increased to 1:0.2, the conver-
sion was completed in 4 min, but the yield was reduced to 86%
(Entry 3). The results showed that changing the molar ratio of sub-
strate with IL had a significant effect on the yield of product, and
the optimum molar ratio of substrate and IL was 1:0.1.
In order to verify the effect of solvents, we have performed the
reaction of benzaldehyde with acetic anhydride using different
2
.2.1. Compound 2a
,1-Diacetoxy-1-phenyl methane, white solid, m.p. 43–44 °C;
H NMR (200 MHz, CDCl ): d 7.67 (s, 1H), 7.29–7.45 (m, 5H), 1.92
): d 168.64, 135.65, 129.69,
1
1
3
1
3
(
1
s, 6H). C NMR (50 MHz, CDCl
28.61, 126.65, 89.76, 20.74 ppm.
3