8814 Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 49, No. 19, 2010
Sarkar et al.
strategies for the artwork of an unprecedented diverse spec-
trum of anisotropic Ni(OH)2 superstructures including nano-
belts, nano/microtubes, nanorods, microspheres, nanoflowers,
nanocarnations, oriented nanocolumns, ribbon- and boardlike
nanostructures, and even more.6 Colloidal synthetic and process-
ing methods have been believed to be flexible enough to
allow promising options for large-scale productions of these
superlattice assemblies and hierarchical structures and, of
course, provide a demanding arsenal over sophisticated equip-
ment-based techniques or rigid experimental conditions. A
rational synthetic protocol involving the traditional use of soft
and hard templates has been manifested for a rich variety of
nanocrystalline materials, although they do present challenges
like removal of the templates, etc.7 In fact, hydrothermal-
assisted “one-pot” synthesis has been attempted as a real
solution to these challenges and has expanded the arena of
achieving the hierarchical frameworks of nanostructures. Also,
Ostwald ripening, the Kirkendall effect, dissolution and recrystalli-
zation, oriented attachment, etc., are different mechanisms
familiarized with this tool for the self-assembly of alleviated
three-dimensionally ordered nanostructures. Although the
above literature surveys the emergence of new particle aniso-
tropies, there is still the need for a simple, environmentally
benign, and less-expensive methodology for the clever organiza-
tion of anisotropic building blocks to scale-up the rapid devel-
opment of desired nanostructured materials.
When the NH3 concentration in the reaction media is tuned,
the shape transformation of Ni(OH)2 from porous nano-
flowers to hexagonal nanoplates, with the intermediacy of
truncated triangular nanoplates, has been achieved, and a
probabilistic explanation has been arranged on the basis of the
surface energy to explain this fascinating assembly. Stacking
interactions between the nanopetals and nanoplates are ob-
served to play a key role in the production of the super-
structures, and such assembly-directed crystal engineering to
fabricate novel organic/inorganic superstructures has been
8
€
well reported by Colfen et al. A quantitative idea of the
specific surface area of the porous frameworks has been made
with nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherm studies. A
notable finding is the formation of nanoholes caused by
dehydration of the hydroxide material during TEM analyses.
Photochemical mineralization of methyl red, an organic
dye, has been made under UV irradiation with nanoflower
morphology, which substantiates the photoactivated catalyt-
ic nature of the semiconductor material, and a comparative
account of its catalytic activity has also been manifested,
in contrast with nanoporous NiO (derived by annealing
Ni(OH)2) and commercial NiO.
Benefitting from the intrinsic porous network, the flower
allows the platform to accommodate a secondary material
like metal nanoparticles, and this typical characteristic lends a
hand to house silver nanoparticles over the nanoframeworks
in our effort. The hybrid material has been characterized with
proper care and, finally, the state-of-the-art efficiency of the
composite material [Ag@Ni(OH)2] lies with their manifesta-
tion as a superior surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS)
substrate for suitable nearby molecules. Analyzing the ob-
served spectroscopic results, we suggest the augmented charge
transfer from metal to ligand for the composite when com-
piled with Ni(OH)2.
Inorganic nanomaterials with structural porosity therein
could lead to a wide variety of promising applications such as
gas sensing, and therefore emerging synthetic attempts have
been made to induce porosity within the superstructures
without any assisting templates.
Herein, entirely simple, cost-effective, completely aqueous
solution-based “bottom-up” chemistry has been judged for its
implications in the anisotropic assembly through an ammonia-
prompted hydrolytic route for controllable syntheses of hier-
archical Ni(OH)2 with only the assistance of nickel acetate as
the metal ion precursor. A series of reaction parameters, the
molar ratio of Ni2þ to NH3 and reaction time, upon morpho-
logical and crystallographic phase evolution have been synthet-
ically and systematically studied to rationalize the structural
configuration. Of course, because NH3 has been employed as a
common synthetic reagent for different nanomaterials, the use
of soft templates like surfactants as structure-directing agents
becomes a necessary tradition. Nonetheless, here only NH3
fuels the fabrication of diverse structural analogues. The
surface attachment of NH3 molecules has been authenticated
and their spatial participation in hydrogen-bonding interac-
tion has been supposed to regulate the self-templated assembly
for microscopic construction with nanometric precision.
Thus, to this end, an attempt has been made successfully to
lay out the fabrication of a material with tunable hierarchy
with the assistance of molecular linkage, and the material
with its parallel bimodal activity, photocatalysis, and SERS
characteristics deserves special attention.
Experimental Section
Materials. Nickel acetate [Ni(OCOCH3)2 H2O] and ammonia
3
were purchased from Sisco Research Laboratory, Mumbai, India.
Hexamethylenetetramine (HMT/hexamine; C6H12N4) and pyri-
dine were purchased from Merck, Gurgaon, India. Silver nitrate
was purchased from Aldrich. All glassware was cleaned using
aqua regia, subsequently rinsed with a copious amount of double-
distilled water, and dried well prior to use. Double-distilled water
was used throughout the course of the investigation.
Synthesis. Nanosized two-dimensional (2D) and three-
dimensional (3D) hierarchical Ni(OH)2 nanostructures have been
synthesized by adapting amine-assisted hydrolysis of aqueous
nickel acetate with the aid of a modified hydrothermal (MHT)
protocol.9a In a typical preparation of a β-Ni(OH)2 nanoflower,
(6) (a) Dong, L.; Chu, Y.; Sun, W. Chem.;Eur. J. 2008, 14, 5064. (b) Tao,
F.; Guan, M.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, L.; Xu, Z.; Chen, J. Cryst. Growth Des. 2008, 8,
2157. (c) Yuan, C.; Zhang, X.; Su, L.; Gao, B.; Shen, L. J. Mater. Chem. 2009,
19, 5772. (d) Ni, X.; Zhang, Y.; Tian, D.; Zheng, H.; Wang, X. J. Cryst. Growth
2007, 306, 418. (e) Xu, L.; Ding, Y.-S.; Chen, C.-H.; Zhao, L.; Rimkus, C.;
Joesten, R.; Suib, S. L. Chem. Mater. 2008, 20, 308. (f) Yang, L.-X.; Zhu, Y. J.;
Tong, H.; Liang, Z. H.; Wang, W. W. Cryst. Growth Des. 2007, 7, 2716. (g) Zhu,
J.; Gui, Z.; Ding, Y.; Wang, Z.; Hu, Y.; Zou, M. J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111,
5622. (h) Yang, D.; Wang, R.; He, M.; Zhang, J.; Liu, Z. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005,
109, 7654. (i) Tan, Y.; Srinivasan, S.; Choi, K.-S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127,
3596. (j) Ni, X.; Zhao, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Song, J.; Zheng, H.; Yang, K. Solid State
Sci. 2006, 8, 1312.
€
(8) (a) Wohlrab, S.; Colfen, H.; Antonietti, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
€
2005, 44, 4087. (b) Jones, F.; Colfen, H.; Antonietti, M. Biomacromolecules
€
2000, 1, 556. (c) Wohlrab, S.; Pinna, N.; Antonietti, M.; Colfen, H. Chem.;Eur.
€
J. 2005, 11, 2903. (d) Yu, S.-H.; Colfen, H.; Antonietti, M. J. Phys. Chem. B
€
2003, 107, 7396. (e) Wang, T.; Colfen, H.; Antonietti, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
€
2005, 127, 3246. (f) Colfen, H.; Antonietti, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44,
5576.
(9) (a) Sinha, A. K.; Jana, S.; Pande, S.; Sarkar, S.; Pradhan, M.; Basu,
M.; Saha, S.; Pal, A.; Pal, T. CrystEngComm 2009, 11, 1210. (b) Creighton,
J. A.; Blatchford, C. G.; Albrecht, M. G. J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 1979, 75,
790.
(7) (a) Sau, T. K.; Murphy, C. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 8648. (b)
Jana, N. R.; Gearheart, L.; Murphy, C. J. J. Phys. Chem. B 2001, 105, 4065. (e)
Orikasa, H.; Karoji, J.; Matsui, K.; Kyotani, T. Dalton Trans. 2007, 3757.