Letters
J. Phys. Chem. B, Vol. 103, No. 29, 1999 5919
AgBr/SiO2 catalyst. The Ag0 species is initially generated as
described in the photographic theory, but the photodecompo-
sition of AgBr is, in fact, inhibited even after UV illumination
for 200 h, suggesting that the behavior of AgBr in the CH3-
OH/H2O solution might be somewhat different from the latent
image formation. One explanation is that the formed Ag0 species
might act as the sites for the H2 formation such as Pt on Pt/
TiO2 catalyst, and then further destruction of AgBr did not take
place. The role of Ag species as the site for H2 formation was
reported by Sclafani et al.13 using Ag/TiO2, although the activity
was less than that of Pt/TiO2. In addition, alcohol radicals are
known to generate hydrogen in the presence of silver colloids.14
Consequently, although there is no evidence about whether the
charge separation is smoothly performed in the presence of Ag
species or Ag species catalyze the H2 production from alcohol
radicals formed by photoinduced hole, the high activity of AgBr/
SiO2 catalyst might be intimately related to the photogenerated
Ag species. We also presume that the roles of SiO2 support
might assist the photocatalysis by the enhanced adsorption of
methanol as proposed by Anderson and Bard15 and might
promote the high dispersion of AgBr crystallites. The stabiliza-
tion mechanism of AgBr under UV illumination is not clear.
Further experiments are necessary to understand the photocata-
lytic activity of AgBr on SiO2 and behavior of methanol under
UV irradiation. The results will be published elsewhere.
Figure 4. XRD spectra of AgBr/SiO2 catalyst before (a) and after (b)
UV illumination.
Previously, Chandrasekaran and Thomas10 carried out the
photolysis of water containing excess silver nitrate using the
AgCl colloid solution. They found the formation of O2 and the
rapid breakdown of the colloid turned black as silver metals.
This reaction is not a catalytic process because the colloids are
eventually destroyed. Furthermore, the strong decrease in the
O2 yield was observed by the addition of a small amount of
CH3OH. It is noted that H2 was not detected in their experiments.
We also observed a similar effect in H2 evolution. The H2
evolution was lowered by the addition of Ag+ ions to the CH3-
OH/H2O solution. Calzaferri et al.11 measured the O2 evolution
over Ag+ zeolite (not AgCl) from water containing Ag+ ions
under illumination, where Ag+ ion was used for a scavenger of
photoinduced electrons.
To elucidate the activity for H2 formation, the catalyst was
characterized by XRD after the photolysis of the CH3OH/H2O
solution. Figure 4 shows XRD patterns before and after the
photolysis. Initially, all sharp peaks were assigned to AgBr as
described above, whereas after the reaction a new XRD peak
corresponding to Ag12 appeared together with the XRD peaks
of AgBr and amorphous SiO2. This means that the Ag formation
occurred on AgBr at the early stage of the reaction, but AgBr
was not destroyed under successive UV illumination. We
consider the reason for the photoassisted H2 production over
References and Notes
(1) Fayet, P.; Granzer, F.; Hegenbart, G.; Moisar, E.; Pischel, B.; Wo¨ste,
L. Phys. ReV. Lett. 1985, 55, 3002.
(2) (a) Ohtani, B.; Ogawa, Y.; Nishimoto, S. J. Phys. Chem. B, 1997,
101, 3746. (b) Sato, S.; Koshiba, H.; Minakami, H.; Kakuta, N.; Ueno, A
Catal. Lett. 1994, 26, 141.
(3) Mau, A. W.-H.; Huang, C.-B.; Kakuta, N.; Bard, A. J.; Campion,
A.; Fox, M. A.; White, J. M.; Webber, S. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106,
6538.
(4) Pfanner, K.; Gfeller, N.; Calzaferri, G. J. Photochem. Photobiol.
A: Chem. 1996, 95, 175.
(5) (a) Schumann, V. Wissenschafliche Photografie, Angerel, E., Ed.;
1931; p 57. (b) Miyamoto, G. Shashinkankouzairyou to toriatukaihou-
(Japanese); Kyoritsu: Tokyo, 1955; p 89.
(6) JCPDS card, 6-0438.
(7) Kanzaki, H.; Sakuragi, S. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 1970, 29, 924.
(8) Tani, H. Photographic SensitiVity; Oxford University Press: New
York, 1995, and references therein.
(9) Kawai, T.; Sakata, T. Nature 1980, 286, 474.
(10) Chandrasekaran, K.; Thomas, J. K. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1983, 97,
357.
(11) Beer, R.; Binder, F.; Calzaferri, G. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A:
Chem. 1992, 69, 67.
(12) JCPDS card, 4-0783.
(13) Sclafani, A.; Mozzanega, M.-N.; Herrmann, J.-M. J. Catal. 1997,
168, 117.
(14) Henglein, A. J. Phys. Chem. 1979, 83, 2209.
(15) Anderson, C.; Bard, A. J. J. Phys. Chem. B 1997, 101, 2611.