T.G. Deineka et al. / Journal of Alloys and Compounds 508 (2010) 200–205
201
low agglomerated Al2O3 [8], Sc2O3 [1] and Y2O3 [9–11] pow-
3. Results and discussion
ders with spherical morphology. It was reported that sulfate ions
ders and hinder them from agglomeration. The doping by the
sulfate ions can be realized in several ways when ammonium
sulfate (NH4)2SO4 is used as sulfate ions source. (NH4)2SO4 can
aging [10,11], or resulting precipitant can be rinsed by (NH4)2SO4
solution [9]. The addition of the ammonium sulfate directly into
reaction mixture gives rise to local change of mixture pH value
and consequently to local variations of chemical composition of
resulted powders [5]. The introduction of sulfate ions during aging
or by precipitant rinsing by (NH4)2SO4 solution does not permit
to control the concentration of sulfates in the precursor. In the
present work we use double crystallized aluminum ammonium
sulfate Al(NH4)(SO4)2·12H2O as the aluminum and sulfate ions
sources.
erties are mainly done on rare earth sesquioxides Sc2O3 and Y2O3.
Despite some works report that doping by sulfate ions improves
structural and morphological characteristics of YAG nanopowders
[2,5,12,13], the role of sulfate ions in the production of highly sin-
terable YAG nanopowders is not clear. The purpose of this work is to
study the influence of sulfate ions on the morphology, size, agglom-
eration degree and sintering peculiarities of carbonate-derived YAG
nanopowders.
3.1. The effect of precipitant
Co-precipitation of inorganic mother salts by AHC leads to the
following hydrolysis reaction of AHC [6]:
NH4HCO3 + H2O ⇔ NH4OH + H2CO3
NH4OH ⇔ NH4+ + OH−
(1)
(2)
H2CO3 ⇔ H+ + HCO3−
(3)
(4)
HCO3− ⇔ H+ + CO3
2−
According to Eqs. (1)–(4), OH− and CO3
anions act as the
2−
precipitating ions. Thus, the chemical composition of a formed
precursor is a result of completion between these anions and
metal cations (Y3+, Al3+) during precipitation. As one can see, the
obtained precursor is usually a carbonate compound, which is only
softly agglomerated and has low decomposition temperature. It
is known that precipitation of Al3+ by AHC leads to formation of
AlOOH or NH4Al(OH2)CO3, whereas interaction of Y3+ with AHC
results in formation of normal or basic carbonates of Y2(CO3)3·nH2O
or Y(OH)CO3, correspondingly. The aluminum rich precursor is
formed first and is then coated by yttrium enriched particles during
precipitation process. For this reason precise control of the pre-
cipitation parameters is required to obtain YAG nanopowders of
2. Experimental
2−
stoichiometric composition. The SO4 ions have drastic effect on
2.1. Synthesis
precursor composition due to their strong tendency to form com-
2−
plexes. The influence of SO4
on the precursor composition and
YAG:Nd3+ nanopowders (3 at.%) were produced by
a reverse strike co-
YAG nanopowders properties is presented below.
precipitation method. The yttrium and neodymium nitrates were used as starting
materials. The ammonium aluminum sulfate Al(NH4)(SO4)2·12H2O (special purity
grade) was utilized as the aluminum and sulfate ions source. Nitrates were
prepared by dissolving of Y2O3 and Nd2O3 (both of special purity grade) in
concentrated nitric acid with subsequent evaporation of acid excess. The 1 M
ammonium hydrogen carbonate NH4HCO3 was used as a precipitant. The con-
centrations of Y(NO3)3, Nd(NO3)3 and Al(NH4)(SO4)2·12H2O solutions were 0.5 M.
The precipitation was carried out at the room temperature; the drip rate was
2 ml/min. The resultant suspension was aged for 24 h and then filtered via suction
filtration. After repeated washing with ethanol and deionized water the precipi-
tant was dried at 100 ◦C for 24 h. YAG:Nd3+ nanopowders of different dispersion
were obtained by precursor calcination in 900–1300 ◦C temperature range for
2 h in the air atmosphere. YAG:Nd3+ nanopowders for vacuum sintering were
molded by uniaxial pressing method with a pressure of 200 MPa. The sintering
of green bodies was performed using vacuum furnace with tungsten heating ele-
ments at the temperature of 1800 ◦C and vacuum of 10−3 Pa without sintering
aids.
3.2. DTA–TG analysis
The thermal decomposition curves of YAG:Nd3+ precursor are
given in Fig. 1. Continuous mass loss of the sample is observed
up to 1200 ◦C and is accompanied by total weight loss of 54%.
Three steps can be distinguished on the thermogravimetric curve
in 20–200, 200–900 and 900–1200 ◦C temperature ranges, indicat-
ing step-wise decomposition of the precursor. The most intensive
weight loss of 31% is observed at the first stage, following by two
relatively sloping stages. The corresponding mass losses are 17 and
6%. The ignition loss observed up to 200 ◦C is caused mainly by
removal of molecular and hydrated water. In the temperature range
of 200–900 ◦C the dehydroxylization and carbonate decomposition
occur, while desulfurization takes place up to 1200 ◦C. The exother-
mic effect on the DTA curve at 900–1000 ◦C was assigned to garnet
phase formation.
2.2. Characterization
Differential thermal and thermogravimetrical analyses of precursor were car-
ried out using a MOM Q-1500D derivatograph (Hungary). The heating rate was
10 ◦C/min, the alpha alumina was used as a reference. For thermal analysis the
precursor was dried at the room temperature. Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR)
spectra of the samples were measured on a FT-IR spectrometer SPECTRUM ONE
(PerkinElmer) with the KBr pellet. Phase identification was performed via X-ray
diffraction (XRD) method with a SIEMENS D-500 X-ray diffractometer using nickel
filtered Cu K˛ radiation. The phases were identified using “PDF-4” card file and “EVA”
retrieval system, included in the diffractometer software. Specific surface area of the
powders was determined by BET (Brunauer–Emmett–Teller) method. Morphology
of the powders was observed by a transmission electronic microscope TEM-125
operated at 100 kV accelerating voltage. Before microscopic examination, the pow-
ders were subjected to ultrasonication by using an ultrasonic dispergator UZDN-A at
frequency of 22 kHz for 45 s. The distilled water was used as a working medium. The
sulfur content was determined by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) method
by a XSAM-800 Kratos spectrometer using Mg K˛ radiation, and by electron probe
microanalysis using a Jeol JSM-6390LV (Jeol) scanning electron microscope with
INCA 350 microanalysis system. The density of ceramic samples was determined by
Archimedes method. The microstructure of ceramics was observed by a Jeol JSM-
6390LV (Jeol) scanning electron microscope after thermal etching at T = 1500 ◦C for
2 h.
Fig. 1. DTA and TG curves of the precursor.