5
76
Y. Yoshimura, K. Ohara / Journal of Alloys and Compounds 408–412 (2006) 573–576
in that the Ln(CF2COO)3 is not the intermediate substance
in the course of the decomposition.
in the electron density distribution of a molecule or molecu-
lar ion.
These differences in the pyrolysis behavior are possibly
due to the size differences between lanthanoid ion and its
ligands. There should be the mismatch between the size of
lanthanoid ion and that of the coordination sphere of water
molecules and the trifluoroacetate ions. Their coordination
spheres are not perfectly packed with three H2O molecules,
so that the interactions will be relatively weaker than those
in the complexes with smaller Ln3+ ions.
In conclusion, the present TG–DTA data provides detailed
information concerning the thermal stability and ther-
mal decomposition of the Ln(CF3COO)3·3H2O complexes
across all the rare earth series. The Ln(CF3COO)3·3H2O
complexes decompose in several stages; first dehydrate to
the anhydrous state, then followed by decomposition of the
anhydrous salt to a stable product of LnF3. Both TG and DTA
analyses revealed the decomposition of the salts to be highly
exothermic. An important point is that the pyrolysis behav-
ior of the Ln(CF3COO)3·3H2O complexes can be classified
into three groups as (1) La–Pr salts; (2) Nd–Gd salts; and (3)
Tb–Lu salts, though all the final decomposition products are
As mentioned briefly in the introduction section, Rillings
and Roberts [10] carried out thermal studies on only three lan-
thanide salts (Pr, Sm, Er) of trifluoroacetic acid. They heated
◦
the compounds to higher temperature of ∼1200 C. It was
◦
reported that slow decomposition was observed from 680
LnF3 up to ∼550 C. This means that the thermal decom-
◦
to 890 C resulting in the formation of PrOF as an unstable
position behavior of the lanthanoid complexes, as well as
thermodynamic properties observed in aqueous lanthanoid
salt solutions, is not the same throughout the series and is
considerably dependent on the size of the lanthanoid ion.
intermediate. Further heating in the wet atmosphere produced
◦
additional hydrolysis until ∼1100 C. In general, all of the
anhydrous compounds decomposed initially to the LnF3 and
then the LnOF and Ln2O3 products were formed upon fur-
ther decomposition under the conditions described in their
paper. They also stated that the compounds, which have iso-
morphous structures within the series with similar d spacings
and line intensities [10,14], dehydrate in definite steps.
They suggested the general decomposition scheme for the
trifluoroacetates to proceed as follows:
References
[1] V. Alexander, Chem. Rev. 95 (1995) 273–342.
[
2] M. Leskel a¨ , L. Niinist o¨ , in: K.A. Gschneidner Jr., L. Eyring (Eds.),
Handbook on the Physics and Chemistry of Rare Earths, Elsevier,
1
986 (chapter 56).
3] R.C. Paul, M.S. Bains, J.S. Ghotra, Indian J. Chem. 7 (1964)
14–519.
4] G.A.-H. Hussen, H.M. Ismail, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 67 (1994)
634–2638.
[
[
Ln(CF3CO2)3 → LnF3 + (CF3CO)2O + CO2 + CO
5
Secondary decomposition of the anhydride also occurred.
2
[
[
5] A.M. Soto, N. Yanagihara, T. Ogura, Anal. Chem. 63 (1991) 1178.
6] N. Yanagihara, S. Nakamura, M. Nakayama, Chem. Lett. (1995)
(
CF3CO)2O → CF3COF + COF2 + CO
There have been a number of thermal decomposition stud-
5
55–556.
[
7] H. Aono, M. Tsuzaki, A. Kawaura, M. Sakamoto, E. Traversa, Y.
Sasaoka, Chem. Lett. 11 (1999) 1175–1176.
8] M.A. Carvalho Filho, N.S. Fernandes, M.I.G. Leles, R. Mendes, M.
Ionashiro, J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 59 (2000) 669–674.
[9] K. Egashira, Y. Yoshimura, H. Kanno, Y. Suzuki, J. Therm. Anal.
Calorim. 71 (2003) 501–508.
[10] K.W. Rillings, J.E. Roberts, Thermochim. Acta 10 (1974) 285–298.
ies on rare earth acetates [15–21]. Adachi and Secco [15]
reported the thermal transformation in anhydrous acetates.
The anhydrous acetates (Ln(CH3COO)3) prepared from the
decomposition of the hydrated rare earth acetates were stable
and decomposed only above 400 C. The anhydrous acetates
also show two stages of decomposition; At the first stage
[
◦
[
11] F.H. Spedding, M.J. Pikal, B.O. Ayers, J. Phys. Chem. 70 (1966)
440–2447.
12] J.A. Rard, F.H. Spedding, J. Phys. Chem. 79 (1975) 257–262.
2
◦
between 420 and 460 C, anhydrous acetates decompose to
[
Ln2O3·CO2 and at the second stage to the formation of the
[13] H. Kanno, Y. Akama, J. Phys. Chem. 91 (1987) 1263–1266.
[14] J.E. Roberts, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 83 (1961) 1087–1088.
Ln2O3. General decomposition paths are as follows:
[
[
15] G. Adachi, E.A. Secco, Can. J. Chem. 50 (1972) 3100–3103.
16] K.C. Patil, G.V. Chandrashekhar, M.V. George, C.N.R. Rao, Can. J.
Chem. 46 (1968) 257–265.
2
Ln(CH3CO2)3 → Ln2O3·CO2 + 2CO2 + 3CH3COCH3
Ln2O3·CO2 → Ln2O3 + 2CO2
[17] K. Manabe, M. Ogawa, Nihonkagakukaishi (1982) 694–696.
[18] K. Manabe, M. Ogawa, Y. Eizuka, Nihonkagakukaishi (1983)
As compared with the results of trifluoroacetates
Ln(CF3COO)3), the anhydrous Ln(CH3COO)3 complexes
decompose at relatively lower temperatures. This might
be due to the effect of the charge diminution at oxygen
of the acetate ion by fluorine substitution [22]. Electron-
withdrawing groups such as F produce significant changes
450–453.
[
[
19] K. Manabe, M. Ogawa, Nihonkagakukaishi (1983) 1092–1095.
20] D.D. Ensor, G.R. Choppin, J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 42 (1980)
(
1477–1480.
[
[
21] I. Mayer, F. Kassierer, J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 28 (1966) 2430–2432.
22] J. Barthel, H.-J. Gores, L. Kraml, J. Phys. Chem. 100 (1996)
1283–1287.