9
8
M. Lamshöft et al. / Inorganica Chimica Acta 382 (2012) 96–104
model fit was determined by F-test (comparison of calculated by
the model and experimentally obtained signal values).
22.5, 22.6, 28.0, 28.4, 29.7, 29.9, 34.6, 44.4, 44.8, 45.2, 45.8, 50.7–
73.1, 111.2, 113.9, 114.7, 118.5, 121.1, 124.8, 127.4, 148.9, 151.9.
I-(4): Anal. Calc. for C26
H
21
N
2
I: C, 69.9
4 3 4
; H, 4.3 . Found: C, 63.7 ;
1
2.3. Quantum chemical methods
4.3
H), 6.64 (d, 2H, J = 9.3), 6.70 (s, 1H), 7.45 (d, 2H, J = 9.3).
NMR: d 19.7, 22.5, 28.2, 28.3, 34.5, 44.4, 45.2, 45.8, 73.3, 111.2–
124.9, 127.4, 148.9. II-(1): Anal. Calc. for C17 13NOFI: C, 51.9 ; H,
%. H NMR: d 2.22–4.13 (m, 5H), 3.17 –
3
%. H NMR: d 1.40–3.00 (m, 7H), 3.39 (q, 4H, J = 6.9), 5.58 (s,
13
1
C
Quantum chemical calculations are performed with GAUSSIAN 98
and DALTON 2.0 program packages [8], visualizing by GAUSVIEW03
program. The geometries of the studied species were optimized by
density functional theory (DFT), employing B3LYP, CAM-B3PW91
and M06–2X functionals. Molecular geometries were fully opti-
mized by the force gradient method using Bernys’ algorithm. For
every structure the stationary points found on the molecule poten-
tial energy hypersurfaces were characterized using standard analyt-
ical harmonic vibrational analysis. The absence of the imaginary
frequencies, as well as of negative eigenvalues of the second-deriv-
ative matrix, confirmed that the stationary points correspond to
minima of the potential energy hypersurfaces. The EAs and Fs in
gas phase and methanol are obtained by TD-DFT calculations, utiliz-
ing the polarizable continuum model (PCM). The calculations are
performed by triple-f quality TZVP, triple-f plus double polarization
TZ2P, Los Alamos National Laboratory’s 2 double-f as well as quasi-
relativistic effective core pseudopotentials from Stuttgart-Dresden.
The large ‘‘correlation consistent’’ basis sets aug-cc-pVDZ and
aug-cc-pVTZ (augmented correlation-consistent polarized valence
double and triple zeta levels) are also applied.
H
1
1
3 2 7
3.3 . Found: C, 51.9 ; 3.4
1
3
3.44 (m, 7H), 6.72 (d, 2H, J = 9.3). C NMR: d 22.3, 22.6, 28.2,
28.3, 29.5, 29.9, 34.6, 44.3, 44.8, 45.2, 45.8, 50.7–73.1, 111.2,
113.9, 114.7, 118.5, 148.6, 169.2. II-(2): Anal. Calc. for C22
H
23
N
2
I:
1
C, 59.7 ; H, 5.2 . Found: C, 59.7 ; 5.2 %. H NMR: d 2.22–4.13 (m,
6 4 7 0
1
3
5H), 3.02–3.22 (m, 7H), 6.72 (d, 2H, J = 9.3). C NMR: d 22.3, 22.6,
28.2, 28.3, 29.5, 29.9, 30.3, 32.7, 34.6, 44.3, 44.8, 45.2, 45.8, 50.7–
73.1, 111.2, 113.9, 114.7, 118.5, 148.6, 155.9. II-(3): Anal. Calc. for
1
C H
30 25
N
2
I: C, 66.6
7
; H, 4.6
6
. Found: C, 66.8
9
; 4.9
1
%. H NMR: d
13
2.22–4.15 (m, 5H), 3.02–3.25 (m, 7H), 6.73 (d, 2H, J = 9.3).
C
NMR: d 22.2, 22.7, 28.1, 28.2, 29.4, 29.8, 30.3, 32.7, 34.5, 44.2,
44.7, 45.1, 45.9, 50.7–73.1, 111.1, 113.8, 114.5, 118.6, 148.7,
155.8. II-(4): Anal. Calc. for C30
H
24
N
2
I: C, 66.8
0 8
; H, 4.4 . Found: C,
1
66.2 ; 4.4 %. H NMR: d 2.22–4.14 (m, 5H), 3.02–3.25 (m, 7H),
3 7
1
3
6.71 (d, 2H, J = 9.2). C NMR: d 22.2, 22.5, 28.1, 28.2, 29.4, 29.8,
30.2, 32.5, 34.5, 44.2, 44.7, 45.1, 45.7, 50.7–73.2, 111.1, 113.8,
114.5, 118.3, 148.5, 166.1. III-(1): Anal. Calc. for C21
H
15NOFI: C,
1
56.9
H), 3.02–3.22 (m, 7H), 6.72 (d, 2H, J = 9.3). C NMR: d 22.3, 22.6,
28.2, 28.3, 29.4, 30.2, 30.3, 32.7, 34.6, 44.3, 44.8, 45.2, 45.8, 50.7–
3.1, 112.7, 113.8, 114.7, 118.2, 148.4, 153.0. III-(2): Anal. Calc.
0 1 7 2
; H, 3.4 . Found: C, 58.1 ; 3.4 %. H NMR: d 2.27–4.19 (m,
1
3
5
2.4. Synthesis
7
1
The ligands are obtained according the classical scheme for syn-
for C26
25 2 2 2 1 7
H N I: C, 63.4 ; H, 5.1 . Found: C, 63.7 ; 4.7 %. H NMR: d
13
thesis of stilbazolium salts [1]. The iodide salt, methyl-substituted
benzene and aldehydes were mixed in 50.0 ml toluene at molar ra-
tio 1:1:1. To the reaction mixture are added 5.00 ml acetic acid and
2.22–4.13 (m, 5H), 3.02–3.22 (m, 7H), 6.72 (d, 2H, J = 9.3).
C
NMR: d 22.3, 22.6, 28.2, 28.3, 29.5, 29.9, 30.3, 32.7, 34.6, 44.3,
44.8, 45.2, 45.8, 50.7–73.1, 111.2, 113.5, 114.7, 118.5, 148.6,
0
.77 g (10.00 mmol) ammonium acetate. The obtained suspensions
155.9. III-(3): Anal. Calc. for C34
H
27
N
2
I: C, 69.1
6 4
; H, 4.7 . Found: C,
1
are stirring during 24 h at r.t. The 0.50 ml k. HI acid and 10.00 ml
ethanol are added. The obtained reaction mixtures stay 16 h at r.t.
69.2 ; 4.4 %. H NMR: d 2.22–4.10 (m, 5H), 3.10–3.20 (m, 7H),
5 3
1
3
6.71 (d, 2H, J = 9.3). C NMR: d 22.2, 22.5, 28.1, 28.5, 29.5, 29.7,
The precipitates were filtered off, washed with C
2
5
H OH and dried
30.3, 32.7, 34.6, 44.2, 44.2, 45.1, 45.7, 50.7–73.0, 111.0, 113.2,
on P at 298 K. The high resolution MS data were in a good agree-
ment with the proposed elemental composition of the singly
2
O
5
114.5, 118.3, 148.5, 155.7. III-(4): Anal. Calc. for C34
H
25
N
2
I: C,
1
69.3 ; H, 4.7 . Found: C, 69.7 ; 4.2 %. H NMR: d 3.11–4.13 (m,
9 6 5 6
+
+
13
charged cations [(C17
H
14
N
3
OF)] (I-(1)), [(C17
H
18
N
2
)] (I-(2)),
5H), 3.15–3.43 (m, 7H), 6.70 (d, 2H, J = 9.2). C NMR: d 22.3–30.0,
+
+
+
[
[
[
(
(
(C26
(C22
(C22
3)), [(C36
IV-(2)), [(C30
H
H
H
23
N
N
2
)] (I-(3)), [(C26
H
21
N
2
)] (I-(4)), [(C18
H
15NOF)] (II-(1)),
30.2, 32.4, 34.5, 44.2, 44.8, 45.2, 45.8, 50.7–73.1, 111.1, 113.8,
+
)]+ (II-(3)), [(C30
+
24
2
)] (II-(2)), [(C30
H
26
N
2
H
24
N
H
2
)] (II-(4)),
114.5, 118.1, 148.5, 155.3. IV-(1): Anal. Calc. for C22
H
23
N
3
: C,
+
+
+
1
17NOF)] (III-(1)), [(C26
H
25
N
2
)] (III-(2)), [(C36
27
N
2
)] (III-
80.2
10H), 3.18–3.34 (m, 4H), 6.92 (s, 1H). C NMR: d 44.4–50.7,
111.2–118.5. IV-(2): Anal. Calc. for C22 : C, 80.7 ; H, 6.4
%. H NMR: d 2.22–3.20 (m, 9H), 3.18–3.34
1
; H, 7.0
4
. Found: C, 80.2
4
; 7.0
7
%. H NMR: d 2.22–3.15 (m,
+
+
+
13
21
H
25
N
2
)] (III-(4)), [(C22
H
23
N
3
)] (IV-(1)), [(C22
H
21
N
3
)]
+
+
H
23
N
3
)] (IV-(3)), and [(C30
H
21
N
3
)] (II-(4)) as well
H
N
3
0
5
.
1
as the elemental analysis. The MS peaks are at m/z 295.221
2
,
Found: C, 80.3
(m, 4H), 6.93 (s, 1H). C NMR: d 44.4–50.5, 111.2–118.3. IV-(3):
Anal. Calc. for C30 : C, 84.4 ; H, 5.6 . Found: C, 84.7 ; 5.5 %.
H NMR: d 2.22–3.23 (m, 9H), 3.20–3.30 (m, 4H), 6.92 (s, 1H).
NMR: d 44.4–50.5, 111.2–118.5 and IV-(4): Anal. Calc. for
2 6
; 6.4
1
3
2
2
3
50.131
18 , 330.386
24.175 , 327.323
6
, 363.444
, 365.189
, 424.181
2
, 361.101
0
, 280.333
3
, 316.487
9
, 414.544
4
, 412.
2
2
5
, 513.227
6
, 538.877 , 487.619
5
1
, 485.334
3
,
H
24
N
3
8
7
9
5
1
13
5
3
1
and 423.545
2
, respectively. Common
C
1
signals of the substituents in the H NMR: d = 2.95 (t, 2H, N-
1
CH
2H), 6.55 (1H), 7.40 (1H), 7.55 (2H) and 8.15 ppm (2H), respec-
tively. Elemental analysis: I-(1): Anal. Calc. for C17 OF: C,
%. H NMR: d, ppm, 9.71 (d,
N), 9.04 (d, 2H, J = 5.2 Hz, C ), 8.10 (d, 2H,
N), 7.80 (t, 1H, J = 4.3 Hz, C
q, 4H, J = 6.8), 6.64 (d, 2H, J = 9.3), 6.69–6.73 (d, 2H), 7.45 (d, 2H,
2
CH
3
), 1.55 (m, 4H, CH
2
CH
2
), 2.13 (t, 3H, CH
3
), 6.55 (2H), 7.18
30 22 3 8 2 1 9
C H N : C, 84.8 ; H, 5.2 . Found: C, 84.9 ; 5.3 %. H NMR: d
1
3
(
2.22–3.21 (m, 9H), 3.20–3.35 (m, 4H), 6.95 (s, 1H). C NMR: d
44.4–51.3, 111.2–120.1. The recrystallization of the ligand IV-(1)
from the solvent mixture methanol to water at ratio 1:1 results to
formation of thin polycrystalline fraction with crystal size 0.02–
13 3
H N
1
6
8 5 2 7
9.3 ; H, 4.4 . Found: C, 69.2 ; 4.4
2
H, J = 6.0 Hz, C
H
5 3
4 3 2
H N
1
J = 6.2 Hz, C
5
H
4
4
H
3
N
2
); H NMR: 3.39
1
0.04 Å. The crystallographic data result to high R -factor of 23%.
The obtained parameters unit cell parameters are a = 10.880(2),
b = 13.483(3) and c = 25.250(5) Å, b = 93.00(3)°, Z = 8, V = 3698.97
(
13
J = 9.3). C NMR: d 12.5, 19.6, 22.5, 28.3, 28.3, 34.5, 44.1, 45.2,
5.9, 73.2, 111.1, 113.4, 114.2, 118.9, 121.2, 124.1, 127.4, 168.8. I-
2): Anal. Calc. for C18 I: C, 55.1 ; H, 5.4 . Found: C, 55.1
%. H NMR: d 1.40–3.00 (m, 7H), 3.40 (q, 4H, J = 6.9), 5.59 (s,
4
Å, monoclinic space system and space group P2
are obtained from (1) and (2) derivatives of ligand type II, where R
is pentyl (or ethyl) substituents, and R = OH, using the labeling in
Scheme 1. The structural parameters are: a = 9.302(2),
b = 12.068(3), c = 12.230(5) Å, = 77.73(3), b = 74.858(10), = 73.7
13(5)°, Z = 1 (1) and a = 9.3087(17), b = 12.032(2), c = 12.216(2) Å,
= 77.751(6), b = 74.627(6), = 73.578(6)°, Z = 2 (2), triclinic space
system and P space group. The crystallographic parameters for the
positions of the heavy atoms are used as input parameters for the
1
/n. Thin 2D crystals
(
5
1
H
21
N
2
1
0
4
;
1
1
.4
H), 6.64 (d, 2H, J = 9.3), 6.72 (s, 1H), 7.46 (d, 2H, J = 9.3).
3
4
1
3
C
NMR: d 19.7, 22.5, 28.0, 28.4, 34.6, 44.4, 45.2, 45.8, 73.2, 111.0,
14.2, 114.3, 118.8, 121.3, 124.9, 148.9, 151.9, 157.2. I-(3): Anal.
a
c
1
1
Calc. C26
H
23
N
2
I: C, 63.6
8
; H, 4.7
3
. Found: C, 63.7
7
; 4.7
2
%. H NMR:
a
c
d 1.42–3.00 (m, 7H), 3.39 (q, 4H, J = 6.8), 5.58 (s, 1H), 6.65 (d, 2H,
1
J = 9.3), 6.68 (s, 1H), 7.47 (d, 2H, J = 9.3). 13C NMR: d 12.5, 19.7,