G Model
Evaluation Only. Created with Aspose.PDF. Copyright 2002-2021 Aspose Pty Ltd.
CCLET 5204 No. of Pages 5
4
A. Franche et al. / Chinese Chemical Letters xxx (2019) xxx–xxx
Table 4
MIC measurements (mg/mL)
Compound
Inhibitory rate (%)
50
70
90
Ketoconazole
Amphotericin B
3
6
7
2
15
>30
50
50
20
>30
>30
ND
ND
20
7.5
30
40
10
69%. Pinacol 12 did not give any inhibitory rate, but the most active
compound was clearly and significantly hexyloxymethylphenol 7
with an inhibition rate of 100%.
Fig. 3. Inhibitory rates of Botrytis cinerea by compounds 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7 and 12 at a
concentration of 50 mg/mL.
So MIC (minimum inhibitory concentration) was chosen to be
performed on compounds 3, 6 and 7. As molecules having
antifungal activities on plant pathogens usually act on respiration
(thiram, mancozeb, captan, dichlofluanid, tolylfluanid); Cyto-
chrome b (strobilurins); β-tubulin (MBC-generating pesticides);
Osmoregulation (dicarboxymides); Sterol biosynthesis (Fenhex-
amide) or Hydrolytic enzymes secretion (anilinopyrimidines) [35],
our molecules 3, 6 and 7 were compared to positive control
standards Ketoconazole [36] and Amphotericin B [37] which were
chosen due to their capability to interact with membrane
ergosterol. Table 4 confirms the interest of compound 7, which
enables to reach 50 and 70% of inhibition with lower concen-
trations than the two other tested compounds. The compound 7
even enables to reach 90% of inhibition, which was not possible
with the two other molecules for the tested concentration range.
Compared to positive controls, results of compound 7 remain
interesting. Indeed even if Ketoconazole and Amphotericin B
trigger 50% of inhibition with lower concentrations, they do not
reaction with Mg gave homo-pinacol coupling in 24% yield, where
no Pinacol coupling was observed when zinc was used. As
mentioned above, one of the most known side-reaction of the
envisioned one is called Bouveault-Blanc reaction, and consists in
reduction of carbonyl into alcohol moiety usually using sodium as
reductant. Under our best conditions (using zinc, under microwave
irradiation, at 150 ꢀC for 15 min.), the selectivity of compound 4
over hydroxybenzyl alcohol 5 was depending on the presence or
absence of acetic acid and water. Indeed, in the presence of water
but not acetic acid (entry 6), only 5% of conversion was observed,
whereas in the presence of acetic acid and water (entry 7), 58%
conversion was obtained, but with a lower selectivity than without
water (entry 1). Moreover, as the reaction took place in the surface
of the zinc powder, 5 equiv. of zinc were necessary to obtain the
best yield of compound 4 (entries 1, 8-10).
For the formation of compound 4, two mechanistic pathways
could be envisioned (Scheme 2): the upper one uses first ethanol in
acidic conditions to obtain the oxonium ion [29]. Then zinc in
acetic acid leads to the reached ether. The other pathway is the
two-electron reduction of the aldehyde [30], followed by the
ethanol addition. As the reaction directly performed from the
benzylic alcohol 5 [31] did not succeed, that led us to suggest the
upper pathway as a mechanism for the reaction (Scheme 2).
To evaluate the scope of the reaction, the reaction was
performed on butyl alcohol and hexyl alcohol, and hexenyl alcohol
(Table 3, entries 2, 3 and 6).
enable to reach 90% for 20
fungal strain.
mg/mL as the compound 7 does for this
To conclude a series of biocides from o-salicylaldehyde by using
zinc was obtained, which possesses good performances in
reductive ether formation, Clemmensen-like reaction, or hetero-
pinacol coupling. Alkoxyphenol compounds proved to be particu-
larly interesting for Botrytis cinerea control. In this context, studies
are ongoing within the team to design new antifungal agents from
other bioresources.
It is noticeable that, due to the microwave ability to act on polar
molecules, the bigger is the aliphatic chain length of alkyl alcohols,
the worse is the reaction yield. So in our conditions, products 4, 6, 7
and 10 were obtained in 73%, 59%, 26% and 24%, respectively
(entries 1, 2, 3 and 6). When more hindered alcohols were chosen
as neopentyl alcohol (entry 4) and tert-butyl alcohol (entry 5) no
attended product was obtained. Reaction on bromobenzaldehyde
did not give the attended product (entry 7). Finally, as salicy-
laldehyde was not able in our conditions to give any homo-pinacol
coupling, we tested the reaction with a ratio EtOH/AcOH (1:1, v/v)
to minimize the ether formation and added hexenal (entry 8)
which gave product 12 of hetero-pinacol coupling in 61% yield
(entry 8). For more details about the syntheses, please see the
Supporting information.
Acknowledgments
Authors would like to thank ESCOM for funding, as well as
Wallonie-Bruxelles International et le Fonds National de la
Recherche Scientifique pour la communauté française de Belgique,
Ministère des Affaires Etrangères et du Développement Interna-
tional (MAEDI) et Ambassade de France en Belgique pour la France
and by the Region of Picardie, France (cofunding of equipment
under CPER 2007–2020 project). Authors would also like to thank
Ministère de l’Education Nationale de la Recherche et de la
Technologie for Research fellowships.
Appendix A. Supplementary data
Some of the synthesized compounds were evaluated for their in
vitro antifungal potential against Botrytis cinerea (MUCL000399).
First the compounds were tested on the mycelium of Botrytis
Supplementarymaterialrelatedtothisarticlecanbefound, inthe
cinerea at a concentration of 50 mg/mL and gave the inhibition
References
rates shown in Fig. 3. From Fig. 3 one can clearly conclude that all
the compounds synthesized had a significantly better effect on
Botrytis cinerea than the starting material salicylaldehyde 1. Cresol
2 had an effect just above 60%, which can be compared to
ethyloxymethylphenol 4. Compound 3 seems to be less efficient
than cresol 2 and butyloxymethylphenol 6 had inhibition rates of
10.1094/PHP-2006-1127-01-DG.
[2] Y. Li, S. Sun, C. Du, et al., Crop Prot. 85 (2016) 52–56.
[3] A. Wakeham, A. Langton, S. Adams, R. Kennedy, Crop Prot. 90 (2016) 27–33.
[4] A. Panebianco, I. Castello, G. Cirvilleri, et al., Crop Prot. 77 (2015) 65–73.
[5] P. Leroux, M. Clerjeau, Crop Prot. 4 (1985) 137–160.
Please cite this article in press as: A. Franche, et al., Zinc-mediated reactions on salicylaldehyde for Botrytis cinerea control, Chin. Chem. Lett.