Angewandte
Research Articles
Chemie
3
ꢀ
3ꢀ
Voltammetric Analysis of Redox Active Species
on the earlier assignment of the N /N couple, N would not
2
stable above 0.19 V and a net oxidation would be observed
instead.
The reactions of the proposed NH species were charac-
terized using cyclic voltammetry, which provides character-
istic potentials for the onset of redox reactions as well as
NH þ 2 e Ð N3ꢀ þ Hꢀ
2ꢀ
ð10Þ
insight into the reaction kinetics. In LiCl–KCl–Li N
3
2
ꢀ
It is therefore suggested that NH is specifically adsorbed
at high potential during the scan, such that current observed
at a2/c2 arises from reductive desorption [Eq. (11)]. This can
be followed by decomposition to form N(ad) and H(ad)
(
0.5 mol%) a series of five reversible redox couples is
ꢀ1
observed at fast scan rates (2 Vs ), labelled a1/c1 to a5/c5
Figure 3A). The a1/c1 couple (Emid = 0.19 V, DE = 0.12) is
(
p
3
ꢀ
assigned to the six electron reduction of N to N [Eq. (1)]
2
[
Eq. (12)], which themselves can be reduced [Eq. (13), (14)],
presumably at the same potentials as c1 and c3, respectively.
The production of H from NH during a2/c2 explains why the
current for the non-N based a3/c3 couple is of similar
magnitude to the N based processes.
having the lowest midpoint potential of all the couples,
slightly more negative than the reported formal potential
2
ꢀ
0
[28]
(
E ’ = 0.382 V). A similar reduction peak appears when N2
is bubbled over a Ni wire in pure LiCl–KCl electrolyte
(
(
Figure S2), while a slow scan of a Ni foam electrode in Li N
0.5 mol%) shows a linear current-potential relationship also
3
NHðadÞ þ 2 e Ð NH ꢀ
NHðadÞ Ð NðadÞ þ HðadÞ
NðadÞ þ 3 e Ð N3ꢀ
2
ð11Þ
ð12Þ
ð13Þ
ð14Þ
with 0.19 Vas the x intercept (Figure S3). Examination of the
blank voltammogram reveals a single reduction peak around
the position of c4, attributed to the one electron reduction of
ꢀ
[29]
residual H O to H2 + OH .
The magnitude of this
2
reduction current, along with a suitable estimate of the
electrode area, can be used to deduce the amount of water in
the melt, which is estimated to be 0.03 mol%. This non-
HðadÞ þ e Ð Hꢀ
3
ꢀ
Reduction of N(ad) is evident in the slower scan rate scans
in both NH and NH2 as a second reduction peak at the c1
position (Figure 3D,F). The much greater significance of the
a1/c1 peaks in both NH2 scans is tentatively attributed to the
more facile loss of H2 from NH2 than NH , resulting in
a lower coverage of H(ad) and thereby favouring reductive
negligible amount of water may react with some of the N to
generate the same protonated species as that formed via
2
ꢀ
ꢀ
reaction with H [Eq. (8), (9)], explaining the presence of
2
ꢀ
further peaks in the voltammetry. To confirm that these
species are indeed formed, voltammograms were also col-
lected of Li NH, LiNH and LiH.
ꢀ
2ꢀ
2
2
3
ꢀ
desorption of N(ad) as N over reaction with H(ad) and
2
ꢀ
3
ꢀ
þ H O Ð NH þ OHꢀ
2ꢀ
N
ð8Þ
ð9Þ
desorption as NH .
2
Following the same approach, the a5/c5 couple (Emid
.19 V, DE = 0.20) can be assigned to the adsorption/desorp-
p
tion of the NH2 ion [Eq. (15)], with similar decomposition
into N(ad) and H(ad) possible [Eq. (16)].
=
NH þ H O Ð NH2 þ OHꢀ
2
ꢀ
ꢀ
2
1
ꢀ
ꢀ
1
The voltammogram of LiNH2 at 2 Vs (Figure 3C)
consists of four pairs of peaks, aligning well with the a1/c1,
a2/c2, a3/c3 and a5/c5 couples seen in Li N. At the slower scan
ꢀ
3
NH ðadÞ þ e Ð NH
ð15Þ
ð16Þ
2
2
ꢀ
1
rate of 100 mVs (Figure 3D) only a1/c1 is reversible, with c2
appearing much more significant than a2 and the a5/c5 couple
replaced by a noisy limiting oxidation current. In comparison,
NH
ðadÞ Ð NðadÞ þ 2 HðadÞ
2
the voltammograms of Li NH only shows a single clear couple
The difference in N:H stoichiometry can also be used to
2
(
Figure 3E), aligning with a2/c2, which also appears to
explain the different behaviour seen at high potential. While
two NH(ad) molecules must decompose (in adjacent sites) in
become irreversible at the slower scan rate (Figure 3F). The
scan also shows evidence for a high potential shoulder on a2
matching the potential of the a3 peak. The onset of a new
oxidation process is also observed at potentials more positive
than 1.5 V. The occurrence of the a2/c2 couple in both NH
and NH2 is unsurprising, given that even in the absence of
H , when LiNH was added to LiCl–KCl at 723 K around
order to evolve H , giving the rate equation a quadratic
2
2
ꢀ
dependence on NH concentration, and the requirement for
ꢀ
neighbouring free surface sites, only one NH
decompose to release H
vacant sites, making the process much faster. Thus, for the
same concentration, oxidation to H is likely to be much faster
has to
2
2
ꢀ
, possibly without requiring adjacent
2
ꢀ
2
2
2
ꢀ
2ꢀ
2
5 mol% was immediately evolved as NH (data not shown),
for NH
2
than for NH . This matches well with the presence
3
ꢀ
presumably via the reaction shown in Equation (5), suggest-
ing a corresponding 25 mol% is converted into NH . This
of a noisy, limiting current for NH
2
oxidation but only a high
2
ꢀ
2ꢀ
potential current peak for NH oxidation.
suggests that measurements of LiNH are actually measure-
2
Finally, the a3/c3 couple (E = 0.73 V, DE = 0.20) is
ꢀ
2ꢀ
mid
p
ments of both NH2 and NH , here in the apparent ratio 2:1.
Focusing on the assignment of the a2/c2 couple (Emid
.51 V, DE = 0.12), there are limited options for reactions of
ꢀ
readily assigned to the H /H couple [Eq. (6)], based on the
2
=
voltammetry of LiH (Figure 3G,H) and the previously
[
30]
0
reported midpoint potential (0.755 V at 673 K). Interest-
p
2
ꢀ
ꢀ
NH which could explain the irreversible reduction behav-
iour seen at slow scan rates in Figure 3D. One possible
reduction would form N and H [Eq. (10)], however, based
ingly at slow scan rates (Figure 3H) H also exhibits a noisy
ꢀ
limiting oxidation current, similar to NH2 , further support-
3
ꢀ
ꢀ
ing the assignment of the limiting current to H evolution.
2
&
&&&
ꢀ 2019 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 2 – 11
These are not the final page numbers!