configuration of all stereogenic centers of 7 could be
established as 2S, 3S, 4R, 8S, 14S, 20R, 1′S, 4′S, 5′S, 7′S,
and 10′S.
Scheme 1. Syntheses of
3,6-Diisopropyl-4-methyl-2,5-morpholinediones 8, 14, and 17
Depsilairdin (7) caused strong necrotic and chlorotic
lesions18 only on brown mustard leaves,19 whereas no damage
was observed on canola or white mustard leaves. The high
selectivity of 7 appears to mimic the pathogenicity range of
the producing isolates, and the lesions resemble the disease
symptoms, which is consistent with a chemically mediated
interplay between host and pathogen.20 It is remarkable that
7 was selective over a wide range of concentrations (µM-
mM), whereas most phytotoxins are selective only at much
narrower ranges (µM).19 It is expected that a highly selective
mediator such as 7 can be an excellent probe to detect, e.g.,
genes and/or receptors targeted by the pathogen to defeat
the plant.
Acknowledgment. We thank Prof. D. E. Ward, Chem-
istry, University of Saskatchewan, for a generous gift of 9.
Financial support from the Natural Sciences and Engineering
Research Council of Canada (Discovery Grant to M.S.C.P)
and the University of Saskatchewan (graduate teaching
assistantship to P.B.C.) is gratefully acknowledged.
procedure12 yielded product X in an amount sufficient for
spectroscopic analysis. The molecular formula (C11H19O3N,
HREI-MS) and the NMR data of X suggested trans-3,6-
diisopropyl-4-methyl-2,5-morpholinedione.
Supporting Information Available: General experimen-
tal, experimental procedures including the synthesis of 8,
X-ray crystallographic data (CIF) for depsilairdin (7),
characterization data for compounds 7 (copies of 1H and 13
C
Next, to determine the absolute configuration of trans-
morpholinedione X (3S,6R or 3R,6S), three stereoisomers
were synthesized as summarized in Scheme 1. Analysis of
the 1H NMR spectra of 8, 14, and 17 confirmed that isomers
8 and 17 displayed proton signals identical to the product
NMR, COSY, HMQC, HMBC spectra) 8, 14, and 17. This
material is available free of charge via the Internet at
OL0478786
1
X, whereas 14 was clearly different. Subsequently, the H
NMR spectra of 8, 17, and X were obtained separately in
the presence of an NMR chiral solvating agent ((R)-(-)-
TFAE).13 The 1H NMR spectrum of X was identical to that
(14) Koch, C.; Simonyiova´, S.; Pabel, J.; Ka¨rtner, A.; Polborn, K.;
Wanner, K. T. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 1244-1263.
(15) Li., W.; Ewing, W. R.; Harris, B. D.; Joullie´, M. M. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1990, 112, 7659-7672.
1
of 8. Furthermore, the H NMR spectrum of X spiked with
(16) Campbell, A. D.; Raynham, T. M.; Taylor, J. K. Synthesis 1998,
1707-1709.
(17) Cheung, S. T.; Benoiton, N. L. Can. J. Chem. 1977, 55, 906-910.
(18) Bioassays described in Supporting Information, as previously
reported for other toxins: Pedras, M. S. C.; Biesenthal, C. J.; Zaharia, I. L.
Plant Sci. 2000, 156, 185-192.
(19) Depsilairdin (7) caused lesions on brown mustard (blackleg
susceptible) ranging from 12 mm (10-3 M) to 6 mm (5 × 10-6 M) in
diameter, whereas canola or white mustard (blackleg resistant) were not
affected, even at 10-3 M. For a multiauthor review on phytotoxins, see:
Graniti, A. Experientia 1991, 47, 751-755.
(20) We suspect that blackleg isolates similar to Mayfair 2 and Laird 2
are not common because their favorite host is not widely cultivated.
Nonetheless, because new oilseed varieties of brown mustard are com-
mercially available, the new blackleg type may soon become widespread.
17 was different, showing two signals for H-6, at δH 4.55
and 4.52. These results confirmed that X was identical to 8.
Since X was a structural fragment of depsilairdin (7), and
the relative configurations of 7 were established by X-ray
crystallography, the overall assignment of the absolute
(12) Depsilairdin (7) was allowed to stand in a solution of DCl in CD3-
OD. After completion of the reaction (15 days), the reaction mixture was
concentrated to dryness and the residue separated by chromatography.
(13) 1H NMR (0.12 M of (R)-(-)-TFAE in CDCl3) for H-6 of (3S,6R)-
enantiomer was at δH 4.55, whereas that of the (3R,6S)-enantiomer was at
δH 4.52.
Org. Lett., Vol. 6, No. 24, 2004
4617