1382
Russ.Chem.Bull., Int.Ed., Vol. 54, No. 6, June, 2005
Ershov et al.
Figures 5, а, b and 6, a illustrate the agreement beꢀ
tween the calculations and experimentally measured
2. P. Neta, R. E. Huie, and A. B. Ross, J. Phys. Chem. Ref.
Data, 1988, 17, 1027.
3
4
5
. B. G. Ershov, M. Kelm, A. V. Gordeev, and E. Janata, Phys.
Chem. Chem. Phys., 2002, 4, 1872.
. G. G. Jayson, B. J. Parsons, and A. J. Swallow, J. Chem.
Soc., Faraday Trans. 1, 1973, 69, 1579.
change in the absorbance of a 1 М solution of NaCl conꢀ
–
4
–1
taining NaI (5.0•10 mol L ) at λ = 380 (see Fig. 5, а),
25 (see Fig. 5, b), and 225 nm (see Fig. 6, а). The
contributions of absorbances from the radical anions
7
. D. Zehahi and J. Rabany, J. Phys. Chem., 1972, 76, 312.
•
–
•–
•
•–
Cl2 , ClOH , I , and I2 involved in chemical transꢀ
formations are also given in Figs 5 and 6. We can conꢀ
clude that this scheme agrees satisfactorily with experiꢀ
6. P. Wardman, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, 1989, 18, 1711.
7. E. Janata, Radiat. Phys. Chem., 1992, 40, 437.
8. E. Janata, Radiat. Phys. Chem., 1994, 44, 449.
9. E. Janata and W. Gutsch, Radiat. Phys. Chem.,
1998, 51, 65.W
10. G. L. Hug, Optical Spectra of Nonmetallic Inorganic Tranꢀ
sient Species in Aqueous Solution, NSRDS—NBS, Washingꢀ
ton, 1981.
1. G. V. Buxton, C. L. Greenstock, W. P. Helman, and A. B.
Ross, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, 1988, 17, 513.
2. E. Janata and R. H. Schuler, J. Phys. Chem., 1982,
86, 2078.W
–
ment in the time interval of oxidation of the I ion with
the Cl2•– radical anion and formation of I2 (∼ 12 µs).
The calculated rate constant of reaction (5) is 4.5•10
L mol–1
•–
9
–1
s .
The results of matching of the experimental data for
1
–
the formation of mixed trihalide ion ICl2 in a time interꢀ
val of ∼ 300 µs are shown in Fig. 6, а. Just these times are
1
characteristic of recombination of the Cl2• and I2
–
•–
radical anions and formation of the trihalide ions and
molecular halogens. The calculated ε value is 4.75•10
13. D. W. Margerum, P. N. Dickson, J. C. Nagy, K. Kumar,
C. P. Bowers, and K. D. Fogelman, Inorg. Chem., 1986,
25, 4900.
4
–
1
–1
L mol cm , which coincides with the earlier meaꢀ
sured13 magnitude.
14. V. Nagarajan and R. W. Fessenden, J. Phys. Chem., 1985,
8
9, 2330.
•
–
The results of this work show that the Cl2 radical
1
5. B. G. Ershov, A. V. Gordeev, E. Janata, and M. Kelm,
–
anion in a 1 М solution of NaCl oxidize the I ion to form
Mendeleev Commun., 2001, 4, 149.
16. B. G. Ershov, M. Kelm, E. Janata, and A. V. Gordeev,
Radiochem. Acta, 2002, 90, 617.
17. S. Navaratnam, B. Parsons, and A. J. Swallow, Radiat. Phys.
Chem., 1980, 15, 159.
18. P. Pagsberg, G. Fenger, and S. O. Nielsen, J. Phys. Chem.,
1969, 73, 1029.
•
•–
the I atom, which is further transformed into the I
2
•
–
radical anion. However, a mixed radical anion ClBr is
formed when the Br ion is oxidized under the same
conditions. In our opinion, this is a consequence of the
–
3
•
–
–
differences between E°(Cl
/2 Cl ) = 2.09 V and
2
•
–
•
–
E°(Br /Br ) = 1.93 V and E°(I /I ) = 1.33 V. In the first
1
9. H. A. Schwarz and B. H. J. Bielski, J. Phys. Chem., 1986,
0, 1445.
case, the potential difference is only 0.16 V, which is
9
favorable for the organization of a mixed orbital in ClBr•
–
.
2
2
0. A. J. Elliot, Can. J. Chem., 1992, 70, 1658.
In the second case, the difference reaches 0.76 V, and the
1. I. G. Draganic and Z. D. Draganic, The Radiation Chemistry
of Water, Academic Press, New York—London, 1971.
2. E. Peled, D. Meisel, and G. Czapski, J. Phys. Chem., 1972,
–
•–
electron transfer from I to Cl2 becomes more enerꢀ
getically favorable.
2
7
6, 3677.
References
1
. B. G. Ershov, Usp. Khim., 2004, 73, 107 [Russ. Chem. Rev.,
004, 73 (Engl. Transl.)].
Received September 23, 2004;
in revised form January 14, 2005
2