Chemistry Letters Vol.32, No.11 (2003)
1037
Table 2.
References and Notes
1
S. Matsunaga, N. Kumagai, S. Harada, and M. Shibasaki, J.
Am. Chem. Soc., 125, 4712 (2003); A. G. Wenzel and E. N.
Jacobsen, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 124, 12964 (2002); T. Akiyama,
J. Takaya, and H. Kagoshima, Tetrahedron Lett., 42, 4025
(2001); S. Kobayashi, H. Ishitani, Y. Yamashita, M. Ueno,
and H. Shimizu, Tetrahedron, 57, 861 (2001); B. List, J.
Am. Chem. Soc., 122, 9336 (2000); H. Ishitani, M. Ueno,
and S. Kobayashi, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 122, 8180 (2000); S.
Kobayashi and H. Ishitani, Chem. Rev., 99, 1069 (1999); S.
Yamasaki, T. Iida, and M. Shibasaki, Tetrahedron Lett., 40,
307 (1999); H. Ishitani, T. Kitazawa, and S. Kobayashi,
Tetrahedron Lett., 40, 2161 (1999); T. Akiyama, J. Takaya,
and H. Kagoshima, Synlett, 1999, 1045; R. Hayakawa and M.
Shimizu, Chem. Lett., 1999, 591; S. Kobayashi, H. Ishitani,
and M. Ueno, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 120, 431 (1998); M.
Shimizu, K. Kume, and T. Fujisawa, Chem. Lett., 1996,
545; S. Shimada, K. Saigo, M. Abe, A. Sudo, and M.
Hasegawa, Chem. Lett., 1992, 1445; T. Mukaiyama, H.
Akamatsu, and J. S. Han, Chem. Lett., 1990, 889; T.
Mukaiyama, K. Kashiwagi, and S. Matsui, Chem. Lett.,
1989, 1397.
I. Ojima, S. Inaba, and K. Yoshida, Tetrahedron Lett., 1977,
3643; I. Ojima, S. Inaba, and M. Nagai, Synthesis, 1981, 545.
S. Kobayashi, R. Akiyama, and M. Moriwaki, Tetrahedron
Lett., 38, 4819 (1997); S. Kobayashi, R. Akiyama, S. K
omiyama, D. C. Oniciu, and A. R. Katrizky, Tetrahedron
Lett., 37, 3731 (1996); S. Kobayashi, H. Ishitani, and S. Ueno,
J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1995, 1379; S. Kobayashi, M.
Araki, H. Ishitani, and S. Nagayama, Synlett, 1995, 233.
A. Fujii, E. Hagiwara, and M. Sodeoka, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
121, 5450(1999); E. Hagiwara, A. Fujii, and M. Sodeoka,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 120, 2474 (1998).
K. Miura, T. Nakagawa, and A. Hosomi, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
124, 536 (2002); K. Miura, K. Tamaki, T. Nakagawa, and
A. Hosomi, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 39, 1958 (2000).
T. Mukaiyama, T. Nakagawa, and H. Fujisawa, Chem. Lett.,
32, 56 (2003); T. Mukaiyama, H. Fujisawa, and T. Nakagawa,
Helv. Chim. Acta, 85, 4518 (2002); H. Fujisawa and T.
Mukaiyama, Chem. Lett., 2002, 182; H. Fujisawa and T.
Mukaiyama, Chem. Lett., 2002, 858.
Typical experimental procedure is as follows (Scheme 1): to a
stirred solution of pottasium phthalimide (3.7 mg, 0.02 mmol)
in DMF (0.3 mL) were added successively a solution of silyl
enolate 2 (48.9 mg, 0.28 mmol) in DMF (0.4 mL) and a solu-
tion of N-tosylbenzaldimine 1 (52.0mg, 0.2 mmol) in DMF
(0.7 mL) at 0 ꢂC. After warmed up to room temperature, the
mixture was stirred for 6 h, and quenched with saturated aque-
ous NH4Cl. The mixture was extracted with AcOEt. Organic
layer was washed with brine and dried over anhydrous sodium
sulfate. After filtration and evaporation of the solvent, the
crude product was purified by preparative TLC to give the cor-
responding ꢀ-amino ester (69.0mg, 95%) as a white powder.
T. Muraoka, S. Kamiya, I. Matsuda, and K. Itoh, J. Chem.
Soc., Chem. Commun., 2002, 1284.
Ts
H+
N
Catalyst (10 mol %)
Silyl enolates
(1.4 equiv.)
+
Products
DMF, rt, Time
Ph
H
Entry
Silyl Enolates Catalyst Time /h Yielda /% anti:syn
OSiMe3
1
2
3
4
6
4
100
83
-
-
St-Bu
OSiMe3
OMe
3
4
3
4
6
6
70
52
1.8:1
1.6:1
(E:Z = 5:1)
OSiMe3
5
6
3
4
24
24
59
67
1.8:1
1.6:1
OMe
(E:Z = 1:9)
OSiMe3
7
8
4
4
3
3
80
72
1.6:1
2.1:1
St-Bu
OSiMe3
Ph
2
3
aYield was determined by 1H NMR analysis (270MHz) using
1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane as an internal standard.
of 3 or 4 proceeded smoothly at room temperature in DMF to af-
ford the corresponding ꢀ-amino esters in high yields (Table 1,
Entries 11–14).
Lewis base-catalyzed Mannich-type reaction was further ex-
amined by using other silyl enolates (Table 2). When the enolate
generated from S-tert-butyl thioisobutyrate was employed, the
corresponding Mannich adduct was obtained in high yield (En-
tries 1 and 2). Furthermore, the Mannich adducts were obtained
in good yields with moderate anti-diastereoselectivity irrespec-
tive of the geometry of the two isometric silyl enolates derived
from methyl propionate (Entries 3–6).8 The reaction of less reac-
tive Z enolate with aldimine proceeded more slowly than that of
E enolate. The observed anti-diastereoselectivities, irrespective
of the geometries of silyl enolates, indicated that the present
Lewis base-catalyzed Mannich-type reaction proceeded via acy-
clic transition states.5,6
Thus, it is noted that lithium benzamide- or potassium
phthalimide-catalyzed Mannich-type reaction between TMS
enolates and aldimines proceeded smoothly under weakly basic
conditions in DMF. This method is practically applicable for the
synthesis of various ꢀ-amino esters because the reactions are
promoted with such a mild, readily-available, and inexpensive
Lewis base catalyst. Further extension of this reaction is now
in progress.
4
5
6
7
This study was supported in part by the Grant of the 21st
Century COE Program from Ministry of Education, Culture,
Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), Japan.
8
Published on the web (Advance View) October 13, 2003; DOI 10.1246/cl.2003.1036