Please do not adjust margins
ChemComm
Page 4 of 5
Journal Name
COMMUNICATION
5
79.
each flitration of the catalyst explains the slight decline in
yield. These results show that the catalyst was robust, suitable
for repeated use, and importantly, for potential application in
a packed bed reactor as part of a flow system. Hence, a
4
DOI: 10.1039/C8CC09913H
6
7
H. Lundberg and H. Adolfsson, ACS Cat., 2015, 5, 3271-3277.
A. Correa and R. Martin, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2014, 136, 7253-
7
256.
Y. Kawagoe, K. Moriyama and H. Togo, Tetrahedron, 2013,
9, 3971-3977.
S. Ghosh, A. Bhaumik, J. Mondal, A. Mallik, S. Sengupta
Bandyopadhyay) and C. Mukhopadhyay, Green Chem., 2012,
4, 3220-3229.
2
Vapourtec R +/R
4
flow reactor (see SI), consisting of a binary
8
9
6
pumping unit driving liquid flow through a reactor was utilised
to examine the feasibility of flow-based amidations. To
accomplish this, a heated column unit was loaded with catalyst
(
1
1
and the system pressure regulated (in-line 75-psi back-
1
0 a) A. Pelter, T. Levitt and P. Nelson, Tetrahedron, 1970, 26,
1539-1544; b) K. Ishihara, S. Ohara and H. Yamamoto, J. Org.
Chem., 1996, 61, 4196-4197; c) N. Gernigon, R. M. Al-Zoubi
and D. G. Hall, J. Org. Chem., 2012, 77, 8386; d) S. Fatemi, N.
Gernigon and D. G. Hall, Green. Chem., 2015, 17, 4016-4028;
e) M. T. Sabatini, L. T. Boulton and T. D. Sheppard, Sci. Adv.,
pressure regulator, BPR). A secondary digital pressure monitor
was added for precise pressure monitoring (sited before
column). Finally, a liquid handling robot allowing collection and
fractionation of the fluidic output. After safety checking and
reliability tests, the system was checked for precipitation and
blocking due to ammonium salt formation upon mixing the
carboxylic acid and amines which could limit this approach.
Prior substrate screening informed us that phenylbutyric acid
and benzylamine was a soluble pairing (57.2 mmol/L solution).
Fraction collection was set for 100 min intervals to allow NMR
analysis to determine conversion and estimation of catalytic
efficiency. The output pattern indicated rapid initial formation
of the amide product (as in batch) but delayed in the output
due to a chromatographic effect of the column (fractions 2 – 6,
see SI). In a typical run, this unoptimised reactor system was
run for 20 h reaching steady state at ~10 h, giving an output
comprising 17% conversion (31 min residence time). In total,
2
017, 3, e1701028; f) H. Noda, M. Furutachi, Y. Asada, M.
Shibasaki and N. Kumagai, Nature Chem., 2017, 9, 571-577;
g) H. Charville, D. Jackson and A. Whiting, Chem. Comm.,
2
010, 46, 1813-1823; h) K. Ishihara, Synthesis and
Application of Organoboron Compounds, 2015, 243-270; and
references therein.
1
1 a) S. Liu, Y. Yang and A. Whiting, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2013, 25,
5692-5700; b) B. M. Monks and A. Whiting. Sustainable
Catalysis, 2013, 89-110; c) K. Arnold, B. Davies and A.
Whiting, Angew. Chem., 2008, 120, 2713; d) K. Arnold, A. S.
Batsanov and A. Whiting, Green Chem., 2008, 10, 124-134; e)
K. Arnold, B. Davies and A. Whiting, Adv. Syn. & Catal., 2006,
3
48, 813-820; f) I. Georgiou, G. Ilyashenko and A. Whiting,
Acc. Chem. Res., 2009, 42, 756-768.
1
1
1
2 S. Arkhipenko, M. T. Sabatini, A. S. Batsanov, V. Karaluka, T.
D. Sheppard, H. S. Rzepa and A. Whiting, Chem. Sci., 2018, 9,
-1
this reactor produced 1.80 g of amide over 116 h (15.5 mg h ),
with activity right to the end of this operational period.
1
058-1072.
3 a) F. Jäkle, Synthesis and Application of Organoboron
Compounds, 2015, 297-325; b) T. Maki, K. Ishihara and H.
Yamamoto, Org. Let., 2005, 7, 5043-5046.
In summary, a novel polystyrene-supported boronic acid
catalyst, prepared by co-polymerisation, shows the propensity
of boronic acids to form anhydrides, resulting in clustering of
the boronate sites within the catalyst, and hence, enabling
efficient catalytic amidation reactivity. Evidence for B-O-B
systems forming di-acyl bridged structures mirrors that of the
4 Examples of bespoke polymers as immobilized monolithic
reagents see: a) F. Svec and J. M. J. Frechet, Anal. Chem.,
1
992, 62, 820–822; b) F. Svec and J. M. J. Frechet, Chem.
Mater., 1995, 7, 707-715; c) P. Hodge, Curr. Opin. Chem.
Biol., 2003, 7, 362-373; d) G. Jas and A. Kirschning, Chem.
Eur. J., 2003, 9, 5708-5723; e) A. Kirschning,W. Solodenko
and K. Mennecke, Chem. Eur. J., 2006, 12, 5972–5990; f) K. F.
Bolton, A. J. Canty, J. A. Deverell, R. M. Guijt, E. F. Hilder, T.
Rodemann and J. A. Smith, Tetrahedron Lett., 2006, 47,
1
2
homogeneous systems previously reported. Application of
the heterogeneous catalyst under standard amidation
conditions (24 h, reflux) gave up to 92% of the amide products.
More than 20 substrates showed direct applicability including
aryl and aliphatic carboxylic acids, and alkyl and aryl amines.
The catalyst could also be recovered by filtration and reused
multiple times without loss of reactivity. This stability also
enabled the use of the catalyst in a flow reaction using a non-
precipitating substrate combination. The flow reaction
proceeded smoothly, maintaining catalytic activity for over 4.5
days of continuous operation.
9
321-9324; g) N. Nikbin, M. Ladlow and S. V. Ley, Org.
Process Res. Dev., 2007, 11, 458-462; h) M. Baumann, I. R.
Baxendale, S. V. Ley, N. Nikbin and C. D. Smith, Org. Biomol.
Chem. 2008, 6, 1587-1593; i) C. J. Smith, N. Nikbin, C. D.
Smith, S. V. Ley and I.R. Baxendale, Org. Biomol. Chem. 2011,
9
, 1927-1937; j) K. A. Roper, H. Lange, A. Polyzos, M. B.
Berry, I. R. Baxendale and S. V. Ley, Beilstein J. Org. Chem.
011, 7, 1648-1655; k) R. J. Ingham, E. Riva, N. Nikbin, I. R.
2
Baxendale and S. V. Ley, Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 3920-3923; l) M.
V. Rojo, L. Guetzoyan and I. R. Baxendale, Org. Biomol. Chem.
2
015, 13, 1768-1777.
1
5 H. S. Rzepa, S. Arkhipenko, E. Wan, M. T. Sabatini, V.
Karaluka, A. Whiting and T. D. Sheppard, J. Org. Chem., 2018,
83, 8020-8025.
Notes and references
1
S. D. Roughley and A. M. Jordan, J. Med. Chem., 2011, 54,
451-3479.
3
16 L. Perreux, A. Loupy and F. Volatron, Tetrahedron, 2002, 58,
2
3
S.-Y. Han and Y.-A. Kim, Tetrahedron, 2004, 60, 2447-2467.
C. A. G. N. Montalbetti and V. Falque, Tetrahedron, 2005, 61,
2155-2162.
1
0827-10852.
4
D. J. C. Constable, P. J. Dunn, J. D. Hayler, G. R. Humphrey, J.
L. Leazer, Jr., R. J. Linderman, K. Lorenz, J. Manley, B. A.
Pearlman, A. Wells, A. Zaks and T. Y. Zhang, Green Chem.,
2
007, 9, 411-420.
Graphical abstract
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2018
Chem. Commun., 2018, 00, 1-3 | 4
Please do not adjust margins