TABLE 1. Asymmetric Reduction of Aryl Alkyl Ketones
Catalyzed by Carbonyl Reductase (SSCR) from Sporobolomyces
salmonicolor
the enantiopreference did not reverse, but afforded the (R)-
enantiomers with dramatically higher enantioselectivity (96-
98% ee) than those found for the methyl (1a) or ethyl (1b)
groups. This is remarkable in that it is in contrast to the usual
observation that the enantioselectivity decreases when the R
group becomes branched.16 In general, high enantioselectivity
is difficult to achieve in the reduction of ketones with bulky
groups via metal-catalyzed hydrogen transfer or hydrogena-
tion.9,17,18 The reductions of butyrophenone (1c), 2,2-dimeth-
ylpropiophenone (1h), and phenyl cyclopropyl ketone (1i) were
carried out on a millimole scale and the corresponding chiral
alcohols were isolated in greater than 90% yields with high
optical purity, demonstrating the applicability of carbonyl
reductase SSCR in the preparation of these chiral alcohols.
A similar substrate-size-induced reversal of stereoselectivity
has previously been observed for the reduction of methyl alkyl
ketones (CH3COR, R is alkyl) catalyzed by an alcohol dehy-
drogenase from Thermoanaerobium brockii.19 Since the X-ray
structures of this carbonyl reductase SSCR and its complex with
a coenzyme, NADPH, have been determined,10,20 an enzyme-
substrate docking analysis was performed on the SSCR protein
structure (PDB file 1Y1P) wth the FlexX program. Such an
analysis would be useful in our understanding of the alkyl chain
induced enantiopreference reversal at the molecular level. Three
residues (Ser133, Try177, and Lys181) were proposed as the
catalytic triad in this short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase
enzyme. The carbonyl oxygen atom of the substrate formed
hydrogen bonds with the Ser133 and Tyr177 residues, and was
protonated from the Tyr177 residue, followed by the attack of
a hydride from the C4 atom of NADPH at the carbonyl carbon
atom of the substrate.20,21 Therefore, care was taken to orient
the hydrogens of hydroxyl groups of Ser133 and Tyr177 toward
the position of water molecule HOH175, which the carbonyl
oxygen of the substrate would occupy during docking. The
overlay of the lowest energy docked conformations of pro-
piophenone (1b) and butyrophenone (1c) into the enzyme active
site are shown in Figure 2 (for individual docking pictures, see
the Supporting Information). In both lowest energy conforma-
tional ensembles the carbonyl carbons were in a position
proximal to the C4 atom of the nicotinamide ring of the cofactor
NADPH (3.311 and 3.394 Å for propiophenone (1b) and
butyrophenone (1c), respectively). The ensembles differed from
one another by the orientations of the substrates at the enzyme
active site. The nicotinamide ring of the cofactor was located
at the Si-face of propiophenone, but at the Re-face of buty-
rophenone. Thus these ketones should be reduced to (R)-1-
phenylpropanol and (S)-1-phenylbutanol, respectively, which is
consistent with our experimental observations. The lowest
energy docked conformation of 2-methylpropiophenone (1g)
showed that the nicotinamide ring of NADPH was located at
specific
activitya
absolute
conf
ketones
ee (%)
1a
1b
1c
1d
1e
1f
1g
1h
1i
28
48
57
114
91
45
42
28
88
87
34
27
98
98
96
98
98
R
R
S
S
S
S
44
R
R
R
R
R
201
574
303
271
1j
1k
a The specific activity was defined in units of nmol·min-1·mg-1
.
The encoded protein was then purified using literature proce-
dures.10,11 The specific activity of carbonyl reductase SSCR
toward the reduction of a series of 1-phenylalkanones was
determined by spectrophotometrically measuring the oxidation
of NADPH at 340 nm at room temperature as previously
described.11 Activity assay with the control cell-free extract,
which was prepared by the expression of the pET15b vector
without the SSCR gene in E. coli BL21(DE3) strain, did not
show activity toward the substrates. The enantioselectivity of
the carbonyl reductase was studied by using a NADPH
regeneration system consisting of D-glucose dehydrogenase
(GDH) and D-glucose.11,13 The enantiomeric excess (ee) values
of the product alcohols were determined by chiral GC analysis.
The absolute configurations of the product alcohols were
assigned by comparing either their retention times with standard
samples14 or their specific rotation with reported data.9,15 The
results are summarized in Table 1.
As can be seen from Table 1, the carbonyl reductase (SSCR)
effectively catalyzed the reduction of all the aryl alkyl ketones
shown in Figure 1. The activity of this enzyme first increased
as the alkyl chain became longer (1a f 1d), reaching its highest
activity when R ) n-butyl (1d). However, the enzyme became
less active when the alkyl chain length was further increased
(longer than 4 carbons, 1e and 1f). Surprisingly, SSCR showed
a higher activity toward the reduction of ketones with bulky
alkyl groups, such as the tert-butyl group (1h). Indeed,
compound 1h showed a higher activity than those found for
the smaller alkyl groups (1a-c,g) and its linear counterpart (1d).
Among all the tested aryl alkyl ketones, the carbonyl reductase
was most active toward the reduction of the aryl cyclopropyl
ketones (1i-k).
An intriguing phenomenon was observed for the enantiose-
lectivity of SSCR-catalyzed reductions of the aryl alkyl ketones.
The reduction of acetophenone (1a) and propiophenone (1b)
produced the (R)-enantiomer as the major product, while the
(S)-enantiomers were obtained in 87-88% ee when the alkyl
group was n-propyl (1c) or n-butyl (1d). The enantioselectivity
decreased as the alkyl group became longer (C5 and C6 chain),
but (S)-configuration alcohols were still the major products.
Interestingly, when the alkyl group became branched, for
example, isopropyl (1g), cyclopropyl (1i), or tert-butyl (1h),
(15) Yamada, T.; Nagata, T.; Sugi, K. D.; Yorozu, K.; Ikeno, T.; Ohtsuka,
Y.; Miyazaki, D.; Mukaiyama, T. Chem.-Eur. J. 2003, 9, 4485-4509.
(16) Brandt, P.; Roth, P.; Andersson, P. G. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69,
4885-4890.
(17) Hayes, A. M.; Morris, D. J.; Clarkson, G. J.; Wills, M. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2005, 127, 7318-7319.
(18) Wu, J.; Ji, J.-X.; Guo, R.; Yeung, C.-H.; Chan, A. S. C. Chem.-
Eur. J. 2003, 9, 2963-2968.
(19) Keinan, E.; Hafeli, E. K.; Seth, K. K.; Lamed, R. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1986, 108, 162-169.
(12) Kazlauskas, R. J. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2000, 4, 81-88.
(13) Eguchi, T.; Kuge, Y.; Inoue, K.; Yoshikawa, N.; Mochida, K.;
Uwajima, T. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 1992, 56, 701-3.
(14) Uray, G.; Stampfer, W.; Fabian, W. M. F. J. Chromatogr. A 2003,
992, 151-157.
(20) Kamitori, S.; Iguchi, A.; Ohtaki, A.; Yamada, M.; Kita, K. J. Mol.
Biol. 2005, 352, 551-558.
(21) Filling, C.; Berndt, K. D.; Benach, J.; Knapp, S.; Prozorovski, T.;
Nordling, E.; Ladenstein, R.; Jornvall, H.; Oppermann, U. J. Biol. Chem.
2002, 277, 25677-25684.
J. Org. Chem, Vol. 71, No. 25, 2006 9485