Dithiocarbamates: Reagents for the Removal of Transition Metals from Organic Reaction Media

Article abstract of DOI:10.1021/op500336h

Dithiocarbamates (DTCs) are ligands known to chelate with Cu and other transition metals to form insoluble complexes. Wastewater treatment protocols have utilized DTCs to remove trace (ppb) metals from waste streams. We have extended the applicability of DTCs to a protocol that readily enables control of the residual Cu in isolated material in a quick and cost-effective manner. Formation of the chelate complex typically results in purging of Cu and a variety of other metals in an array of reaction media to ≤10 ppm. Furthermore, the simplicity of the method makes it very attractive for large-scale applications late in a synthetic sequence because of the low toxicity and efficient removal of the metal complex by filtration.

Full text of DOI:10.1021/op500336h

Technical Note
pubs.acs.org/OPRD
Dithiocarbamates: Reagents for the Removal of Transition Metals
from Organic Reaction Media
William P. Gallagher* and Anh Vo
Chemical Development, Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., 1 Squibb Drive, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903, United States
S
* Supporting Information
ABSTRACT: Dithiocarbamates (DTCs) are ligands known to chelate with Cu and other transition metals to form insoluble
complexes. Wastewater treatment protocols have utilized DTCs to remove trace (ppb) metals from waste streams. We have
extended the applicability of DTCs to a protocol that readily enables control of the residual Cu in isolated material in a quick and
cost-effective manner. Formation of the chelate complex typically results in purging of Cu and a variety of other metals in an
array of reaction media to ≤10 ppm. Furthermore, the simplicity of the method makes it very attractive for large-scale
applications late in a synthetic sequence because of the low toxicity and efficient removal of the metal complex by filtration.
dimerization, thus lowering the yield of the desired material
(Scheme 1).
INTRODUCTION
■
In pharmaceutical process research, final products must meet
strict purity requirements, and thus, impurity removal becomes
an essential task. The favored industrial-scale techniques for
rejecting impurities are crystallization and extraction, but these
approaches are not always viable. In the laboratory,
chromatography offers a functional solution to many impurity
problems, but on an industrial scale, it is rather time-demanding
and expensive.
The Ullmann coupling presumably proceeds through a Cu+/
Cu3+ catalytic cycle.7 On a lab scale, typical workup upon
reaction completion involved opening the system to air
followed by washing with EDTA, which provided oxidative
conditions to form the needed Cu2+ species. As the process was
scaled up, the amount of O2 needed varied depending on the
scale, and thus, our process to provide the oxidative conditions
to remove the Cu was inconsistent. Our experimental data
showed that the formation of the undesired side product 4
required the combination KOH, O2, and Cu. We hypothesized
that if we could effect Cu removal under low O2 levels, the
formation of 4 could be minimized.8 We then examined a
variety of methods to remove Cu from our process stream
(Table 1). A variety of solid-supported reagents9 were tested,
but the results were highly variable. Metal hydroxides have been
used to precipitate transition metals, but these methods caused
further degradation of 3. The formation of metal sulfides has
been used, but with our system, further degradation was seen.
A literature search revealed that dithiocarbamates (DTCs)
have been utilized in the water treatment industry to remove
trace (ppb) amounts of heavy metals10 for more than 30 years.
DTCs form stable complexes with most transition metals,
independent of oxidation state.11 Scheme 2 shows a variety of
DTCs that are readily available in bulk quantities in solid form
and as aqueous solutions. DTCs are air-stable solids that
possess high water solubility,12 which makes removal of any
residual DTC from the reaction train straightforward, in
contrast to solid-phase adsorbents,13 which could require
specialized equipment for their use. DTCs are generally stable
at pH 7.0 or above, but at lower pH they can degrade to their
parent amine and CS2.
The increasing use of organometallic reagents and
homogeneous catalysts in pharmaceutical synthesis has made
the removal of trace metal impurities1 a high priority. Unlike
heterogeneous2 catalysis, where the metal can simply be filtered
away, homogeneous processes are burdened with soluble metal
impurities or byproducts. For example, copper catalysis3 is
employed in ring expansions, Castro−Stevens (Sonogashira)
couplings,4a Huisgen azide−alkyne cycloadditions,4b and
Ullmann reactions.3b Other metal-catalyzed coupling reactions
have also become increasingly utilized to make advanced
intermediates or final products.5 Since the coupling conditions
can tolerate a high degree of complexity, the metal-catalyzed
reaction is often positioned late in the synthetic scheme, thus
restricting opportunities for impurity rejection.6 Because of the
high enantioselectivity achieved, homogeneous catalytic hydro-
genation has become a chosen method for preparing
enantiopure intermediates on a large scale. In addition, removal
of trace metal impurities can be further complicated by the
existence of the metal as two or more different species, often as
a result of multiple oxidation states. We have recently found an
attractive and broadly applicable method for removing trace
metals from organic reaction media and have demonstrated its
effectiveness on a large scale with an Ullmann coupling.
To screen the effectiveness of DTCs in our system, we
carried out the Ullmann coupling, and upon completion the
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
■
In the synthesis of a key intermediate for an HIV attachment
inhibitor, we recently encountered a process necessitating the
removal of Cu+/Cu3+ from an Ullmann coupling. Furthermore,
the product could participate in a Cu-catalyzed oxidative
Special Issue: Non-precious Metal Catalysis
Received: October 27, 2014
© XXXX American Chemical Society
A
dx.doi.org/10.1021/op500336h | Org. Process Res. Dev. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX

Organic Process Research & Development
Technical Note
Scheme 1. Cu-catalyzed Ullman coupling
Table 1. Initial screening of Cu scavengers (15 g scale)
Table 2. Initial use of DTCs for Cu removal
a
reagent
amount of reagent Cu level in rich organic phase
Cu level in rich organic phase
b
DTC
scale
15 g
(ppm)
4
SiliaMetS Thiol
SiliaMetS Thiourea
KOH
30 g
900 ppm + 4
NaDMDTC
86
85
75
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
60 g
850 ppm + 4
NaDEDTC
15 g
15 g
10 equiv wrt Cu
6 equiv wrt Cu
10 equiv wrt Cu
3500 ppm + 4
500−3500 ppm + 4
750 ppm + 4
APDTC
EDTA
a
APDTC (optimized)
APDTC (optimized)
APDTC (optimized)
APDTC (optimized)
APDTC (optimized)
15 g
20
Na2S
a
100 g
20 kg
90 kg
156 kg
20
a
The starting level was 3600 ppm.
a
20
a
24
c
reaction mixture was cooled to 50 °C.14 An excess of each DTC
was added as a solid under an atmosphere of N2, and a dark
solid precipitated immediately. The slurry was filtered, and the
rich organics were analyzed for Cu content. We found that in
each case the amount of Cu was reduced to <100 ppm, and no
product degradation was observed. Experimental results and
knowledge from single-crystal X-ray studies showing that
DTC−metal complexes are primarily dimeric in structure15
led us to use 2.2 equiv of DTC with respect to (wrt) the
amount of CuI used. We found that the addition of solid DTC
led to faster filtering of the material16 compared with the
addition of an aqueous solution of DTC. With the optimized
conditions17 in hand, APDTC18 was demonstrated to control
Cu levels to less than 25 ppm on scales from 15 g to 156 kg
(Table 2). We were also pleased that we had control of 4 once
the Cu was removed from the system. On scale, the filtration
setup was critical for consistent removal of the solids, as we
needed to filter at 1 μm porosity19 to remove the formed small
particles. We utilized a nutsche filter with a Celite bed to
remove a majority of the DTC complex20 followed by an in-line
polish filter (1 μm).
Since we are utilizing DTCs in the preparation of active
pharmaceutical agents, we need to pay attention to their
toxicity, as trace levels of these impurities could be present in
our isolated material. NaDMDTC has been extensively
studied21 and is considered to be a genotoxic impurity
(GTI), whereas the NaDEDTC22 has been found to be
Ames-negative. We recently tested APDTC and found it to be
Ames-negative, and thus, it is not considered to be a GTI.
Since we had success with Cu removal, we postulated that
DTCs could be utilized to remove other thiophilic metals from
organic media. Initially, we looked at several different metals
3
a
b
After filtration through a 1 μm polish filter at 50 °C. These values
are HPLC area percentages. The filtration was carried out at 30 °C
through a 1 μm polish filter.
c
that are soluble in organic solvents. Because of their availability
and low toxicity, NaDEDTC and APDTC were chosen for
further study. The solvent composition and oxidation state of
the metal were varied. We initially made solutions containing
4000 ppm metal. At 20 °C,23 the solid DTC (2.2 equiv wrt
metal) was added, followed by water. After 1 h of stirring, the
solutions were filtered and analyzed. Our initial results
indicated that homogeneous Pd, Cu, Al, Fe, Ni, and Ru24
could be removed to less than 10 ppm (Tables 3 and 4).25 We
also prepared a select few examples containing 100 ppm metal
(Table 5). After DTC treatment and filtration, the metal was
removed to ≤10 ppm in each case.
The competition with various ligands was also considered. In
the Ullmann coupling, we utilized a diamine ligand that did not
interfere with the DTC complexation. 1,1′-Bis-
(diphenylphosphino)ferrocene (dppf)26 is a ligand that is
known to bind to Pd very well. With dppf in THF, treatment
with APDTC resulted in complete removal of the ligand from
the THF solution. When PdII(dppf)Cl2 was used, we were able
to remove the palladium and the dppf from the organic solvent
(Table 6).
Having demonstrated the ability to remove the metals in an
isolated environment, we next looked at several different metal-
catalyzed reactions to see whether the DTC was as efficient in
removing a variety of metals from other complex reaction
media. We performed a borylation, a Heck coupling,27
a
Sonogashira coupling, a Rh-catalyzed hydrogenation, and a
Scheme 2. Types of commercially available DTCs
B
dx.doi.org/10.1021/op500336h | Org. Process Res. Dev. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX

Organic Process Research & Development
Technical Note
Table 3. Use of APDTC with a starting concentration of
4000 ppm in solution
Table 4. Use of NaDEDTC with a starting concentration of
4000 ppm in solution
metal
solvent
THF
final metal content (ppm)
metal
solvent
THF
final metal content (ppm)
Pd(OAc)2
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
140
104
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
70
Pd(OAc)2
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
140
160
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
85
MeCN
DMF
MeCN
DMF
PdCl2(MeCN)2
Pd2dba3
THF
PdCl2(MeCN)2
Pd2dba3
THF
MeCN
DMF
MeCN
DMF
THF
THF
MeCN
DMF
MeCN
DMF
Cu(OAc)2
DIBALH
MeCN/MeOH
THF
Cu(OAc)2
DIBALH
MeCN/MeOH
THF
MTBE
PhMe
MeCN
DMF
MTBE
PhMe
MeCN
DMF
Co(acac)2
Fe(OAc)2
Ni(acac)2
NiCl2(PPh3)2
RuO2
Co(acac)2
Fe(OAc)2
Ni(acac)2
NiCl2(PPh3)2
RuO2
NMP
NMP
MeCN/MeOH
DMF
MeCN/MeOH
DMF
THF
THF
MeCN
DMF
MeCN
DMF
NMP
NMP
MeCN
MeCN
THF
MeCN
MeCN
THF
Rh(COD)2BF4
RhCl(PPh3)3
Rh(COD)2BF4
RhCl(PPh3)3
DMF
70
DMF
80
Rh(CO)(PPh3)3
THF
16
Rh(CO)(PPh3)3
THF
16
DMF
15
DMF
20
Table 5. Use of APDTC with a starting concentration of 100
ppm in solution
DIBALH reduction on a lab scale. After the reactions were
taken to completion, the reaction mixtures were treated with
APDTC and filtered (1 μm), and the rich organic phases were
analyzed for metal content.28 Upon completion of the
borylation and Heck coupling reactions (Scheme 3), the
treatment with DTC (2.2 equiv) followed by filtration afforded
a product-rich organic stream with <10 ppm Pd. The
Sonogashira coupling29 was chosen to demonstrate that two
different metals could be removed simultaneously (Scheme 4).
Upon treatment with APDTC, solids precipitated immediately
from the reaction medium. Analysis of the rich organic phase
indicated that both Pd and Cu were removed to ≤10 ppm.
Upon completion of the Rh-catalyzed hydrogenation,30
APDTC treatment generated a rich organic stream that
contained <20 ppm Rh and <10 ppm Fe.
metal
solvent
THF
final metal content (ppm)
Pd(OAc)2
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
MeCN
DMF
PdCl2(MeCN)2
Pd2dba3
THF
MeCN
DMF
THF
MeCN
DMF
Cu(OAc)2
MeCN/MeOH
Table 6. Ligand competition experiment
Finally, we examined a DIBALH reduction, a process that has
a large excess of metal present. Typically, after quenching of the
residual DIBALH, aqueous washes are applied to remove the
Al. These washes can be problematic because of the formation
of emulsions that can be very challenging on a large scale. Once
the DIBALH reduction was complete and the residual DIBALH
was quenched, we added APDTC, and a solid precipitated
immediately. After filtration of the solids, the rich organic
stream contained <20 ppm Al.
reagent
dppf
Pd(dppf)Cl2
equiv of APDTC
rich organic analysis
2.2
4.4
<10 ppm Fe
<10 ppm Pd
<10 ppm Fe
demonstrated that DTCs can potentially be used to remove
other metals to <10 ppm in a wide variety of reaction media.
This protocol should allow the process scientist to control the
residual metal in their isolated material in a quick and cost-
effective manner. Furthermore, the simplicity of the method
makes it very attractive for large-scale applications late in a
synthetic sequence.
CONCLUSIONS
■
Our Ullmann process was optimized for the removal of Cu
from the rich organic stream utilizing APDTC. We have shown
that this protocol performed as expected up to a 156 kg scale
while maintaining control of the dimer impurity 4. We have
C
dx.doi.org/10.1021/op500336h | Org. Process Res. Dev. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX

Organic Process Research & Development
Technical Note
Scheme 3. Removal of a single metal with APDTC
Scheme 4. Removal of two metals simultaneously with APDTC
(0.68 equiv, 4.99 kg). The mixture was stirred at 50 °C for 1 h
and then filtered over a bed of Celite followed by an in-line
polish filter (1 μm). The rich organic phase was then
concentrated to half the volume by vacuum distillation.
MeCN (120 L) was added, and a constant-volume distillation
was performed using MeCN to achieve an end point of 2−3%
EtOH and NMT 1% KF. At 50 °C, the solution was polish-
filtered (1 μm) and transferred to a reactor. Water (0.30 L/kg,
6.00 L) was added, and the system was maintained at 50 °C. A
solution of lithium iodide hydrate (1.05 equiv, 8.85 kg) and
MeCN (2 L/kg, 40.00 L) was prepared, and 35% of this
solution was added over 1 h. At this time, seeds of 3 (1 wt %,
0.200 kg) were added. At 50 °C, the remaining 65% of the
solution was added over 12 h at 50 °C. The resulting slurry was
cooled to 30 °C over 3 h. The slurry was filtered and washed
with 97:3 MeCN/water (10 L/kg) and then a final rinse with
100% MeCN (10 L/kg). The solids were dried at 50 °C over
12 h to afford 3 (14.64 kg, 72% yield) as a yellow solid.
EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
■
General Methods. Reaction mixtures were stirred, and the
reactions were monitored by HPLC. HPLC was performed31
on an Agilent HPLC system with a Supelco Ascentis Express
C18 column (150 mm × 3 mm, 2.7 μm particle size (part no.
53816-U). Yields refer to recrystallized and spectroscopically
pure compounds, unless noted otherwise. Metal analysis was
performed using ICP analysis (PerkinElmer Optima 8300 DV
ICP-AES).
General Procedure for the Use of DTC on Lab Scale.
Once the reaction was complete (TLC or HPLC), DTC (2.2
equiv wrt the metal) was added as a solid, followed by the
addition of water (2 mL/g).32 The reaction medium was held
for 1 h at the desired temperature. The slurry was filtered
through a 1 μm filter.
Use of APDTC on Scale: Removal of Cu from an
Ullmann Coupling on a 20 kg Scale. A mixture of KOH
(2.05 equiv, 4.88 kg), water (30 equiv, 23.2 kg), 2 (1.5 equiv,
5.30 kg), EtOH (237 L), N,N′-dimethyl-1,2-cyclohexanedi-
amine (0.80 equiv, 4.83 kg), 1 (20 kg), and CuI (0.30 equiv,
2.43 kg) was placed under vacuum, and the reaction vessel was
backfilled with N2. This was completed three times. The
reaction mixture was heated to 80 °C and held at that
temperature for 20 h. Once the reaction was complete as
determined by HPLC [<2 relative area percent 1], the reaction
mixture was cooled to 50 °C. A solution of KOH (0.68 equiv,
1.62 kg) in EtOH (29.0 L) was added, followed by APDTC
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
■
S
* Supporting Information
Solubility data for NADEDTC and APDTC and additional
experimental procedures. This material is available free of
charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
D
dx.doi.org/10.1021/op500336h | Org. Process Res. Dev. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX

Organic Process Research & Development
Technical Note
(18) Ammonium pyrrolidinedithiocarbamate (APDTC) was chosen
for further development because of the quantity needed and the
availability at the time. HPLC conditions were developed in order to
analyze for residual APDTC in isolated materials.
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Corresponding Author
*E-mail: william.gallagher@bms.com.
■
(19) In the lab, we found that solids did pass through when 5 and 10
μm filter cloths were used.
(20) We utilized a cake wash to ensure that no product loss occurred.
Analysis of the isolated APDTC−Cu complex showed no detectable
amounts of the desired product 3.
(21) (a) Liesivuori, J.; Savolainen, K. Toxicology 1994, 91, 37−42.
(b) Weissmahr, K. W.; Sedlak, D. L. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2000, 19,
820−826.
(22) (a) Howell, J. M. Nature 1964, 201, 83−84. (b) Ashby, J.;
Tennant, R. W. Mutat. Res. 1988, 204, 17−115.
(23) We utilized 50 °C for the initial Cu removal, but this was due to
the low solubility of the product at 20 °C. Room temperature was
chosen for ease of operation. Heating of the sample was not necessary
for the DTC to form the metal complex.
(24) Co(acac)2 was removed to only ∼100 ppm. This system was not
studied beyond these screens, and the solubility of the Co−DTC
complex was not measured. Rh catalysts also were not purged
completely, and the solubility of the Rh−DTC complex was not
measured.
Notes
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
■
We thank Drs. Greg Beutner, Yi Xiao, Michael Randazzo, Dave
Conlon, and Robert E. Waltermire for helpful discussions and
Lydia Breckenridge for performing the metals analysis.
REFERENCES
■
(1) (a) ICH guidance for elemental impurities: http://www.ich.org/
fileadmin/Public_Web_Site/ICH_Products/Guidelines/Quality/
Q3D/Q3D_Step2b.pdf. (b) EMEA’s guideline on the specification
limits for metal residues of metal catalysts of metal reagents: EMEA/
CHMP/SWP/4446/200, 2008.
(2) Heterogeneous catalysis can suffer from metal leaching problems
occurring in the liquid phase. See: Cantillo, D.; Kappe, C. O.
ChemCatChem. 2014, DOI: 10.1002/cctc.201402483.
(3) (a) Allen, S. E.; Walvoord, R. R.; Padilla-Salinas, R.; Kozlowski,
M. C. Chem. Rev. 2013, 113, 6234−6458. (b) Beletskaya, I. P.;
Cheprakov, A. V. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2004, 248, 2337−2364.
(4) (a) Stephens, R. D.; Castro, C. E. J. Org. Chem. 1963, 28, 3313−
3315. (b) Huisgen, R. Proc. Chem. Soc., London 1961, 357−396.
(5) (a) Heck, R. F. Palladium Reagents in Organic Syntheses; Academic
Press: New York, 1985. (b) Handbook of Organopalladium Chemistry
for Organic Synthesis; Negishi, E., de Meijere, A., Eds.; Wiley: New
York, 2002.
(6) (a) For a recent review of Pd removal, see: Garrett, C. H.;
Prasad, K. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2004, 346, 889−900. (b) Konigsberger,
K.; Chen, G.-P.; Wu, R. R.; Girgis, M. J.; Prasad, K.; Repic, O.;
Blacklock, T. J. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2003, 7, 733−742. (c) Welch, C.
J.; Albaneze-Walker, J.; Leonard, W. R.; Biba, M.; DaSilva, J.;
Henderson, D.; Laing, B.; Mathre, D. J.; Spencer, S.; Bu, X.; Wang,
T. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2005, 9, 198−205. (d) Magano, J. In
Transition Metal-Catalyzed Couplings in Process Chemistry; Magano, J.,
Dunetz, J. R., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2013; pp 313−
355.
(25) We utilized 2.2 equiv of the desired DTC wrt the metal catalyst
in all cases.
(26) Kelly, W.; Belabassi, Y.; Gouault-Bironneau, S.; Montchamp, J.-
L. e-EROS Encycl. Reagents Org. Synth. 2001, DOI: 10.1002/
047084289X.rb161.
(27) Li, Y.; Li, Z.; Li, F.; Wang, Q.; Tao, F. Tetrahdron Lett. 2005, 46,
6159−6162.
(28) For simplicity, a general protocol was utilized for the removal of
metals from the different reaction media. Further optimization would
need to be performed in order to move forward.
(29) Hundertmark, T.; Littke, A. F.; Buchwald, S. L.; Fu, G. C. Org.
Lett. 2000, 2, 1729−1731.
(30) Panella, L.; Aleixandre, A. M.; Kruidhof, G. J.; Robertus, J.;
Feringa, B. L.; de Vries, J. G.; Minnaard, A. J. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71,
2026−2036.
(31) HPLC conditions: Buffer: 200 mM NH4OAc. Mobile phase A:
MeOH/buffer/water (2:1:7). Mobile phase B: MeCN/MeOH/buffer
(7:2:1). Diluent: water/MeCN (2:8). Wavelength: 302 nm. Injection
volume: 5 μL. Run time: 35 min. Flow rate: 0.4 mL/min. Column
temperature: 30 °C. Gradient: 0 min, 0% B; 5 min, 20% B; 20 min,
25% B; 25 min, 100% B; 30 min, 100% B; 30.1 min, 0% B; 35 min, 0%
B.
(7) Strieter, E. R.; Bhayana, B.; Buchwald, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2009, 131, 78−88.
(8) The 3:4 ratio was determined by HPLC analysis.
(9) SiliaMetS Thiol (R51030B) and SiliaMetS Thiourea (R69530B)
were utilized. For use by others, see: Dorow, R. L.; Herrinton, P. M.;
Hohler, R. A.; Maloney, M. T.; Mauragis, M. A.; McGhee, W. E.;
Moeslein, J. A.; Strohbach, J. W.; Veley, M. F. Org. Process Res. Dev.
2006, 10, 493−499.
(32) Presumably water is the antisolvent for the formed metal−DTC
complex. If water is excluded, the residual metal levels will be higher.
(10) Wing, R. E.; Rayford, W. E. Plat. Surf. Finish. 1982, 69, 67−71.
(11) (a) Golcu, A. Transition Met. Chem. 2006, 31, 405−412.
̈
̈
(b) Hogarth, G. Prog. Inorg. Chem. 2005, 53, 71−561. (c) Heard, P. J.
Prog. Inorg. Chem. 2005, 53, 1−69.
(12) Most DTCs display high water solubility, so they could simply
be washed out of the rich organic stream prior to isolation if one
wanted to remove residual DTCs.
(13) Ryberg, P. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2008, 12, 540−543.
(14) 50 °C was chosen in order to maintain full solubility of the
desired product 3.
(15) X-ray analysis reported in the literature has shown that DTCs
form dimeric structures with Cu. See: Giovagnini, L.; Sitran, S.;
Montopoli, M.; Caparrotta, L.; Corsini, M.; Rosani, C.; Zanello, P.;
Dou, Q. P.; Fregona, D. Inorg. Chem. 2008, 47, 6336−6343.
(16) Since the precipitation is rapid, it is difficult to control the
particle size. Thus, small particles are obtained. When solid APDTC
was used, the filtration flux was 1100 L m−2 h−1. With an aqueous
solution of APDTC, the filtration flux was 700 L m−2 h−1.
(17) At least a 1 μm filter had to be used in order to remove all of the
solids.
E
dx.doi.org/10.1021/op500336h | Org. Process Res. Dev. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX