heteropolyacids using K2S2O8 (5.0 mmol) as an oxidant in
CF3COOH (5.0 mL) for the reaction of methane (40 atm)
with CO (20 atm). The results are summarized in Table 1.
K2S2O8 was found to be the best oxidant (TON 27.5) for
the VO(acac)2 catalyst in CF3COOH. Other oxidants such
as tert-BuOOH and NaOCl also work, while the TONs are
low (TON: 6-9).11 The reaction depends on the solvent.
CF3COOH is the best solvent for the carboxylation of
methane. Water can also serve as a solvent, although the
turnover number is low (TON: 5.9). Figure 1 shows the plot
Table 1. Reaction of Methane and CO Leading to Acetic Acid
in the Presence of Various Metal Catalysts, K2S2O8 and
CF3COOHa
yield (%) based on
acetic acid
catalyst
(mmol)
TONb CH4 CO K2S2O8
none
0
0
0
0
H3PMo12O40‚30H2O
H4PVMo11O40‚30H2O
H5PV2Mo10O40‚30H2O
H6PV3Mo9O40‚30H2O
H7PV4Mo8O40‚30H2O
H8PV5Mo7O40‚30H2O
H3PW6Mo6O40‚30H2O
H3PW12O40‚30H2O
H4SiW12O40‚30H2O
H5SiVW11O40‚29H2O
H4SiW4Mo8O40‚29H2O
H4SiMo12O40‚28H2O
VO(acac)2
0.01
1.11
1.23
1.21
1.46
1.21
0.02
0.11
0.01
1.56
0.04
0.03
1.38
2.00
1.28
1.41
0.08
0.19
0.2 0.01 0.02
22.2 0.56 1.12
24.5 0.64 1.28
24.2 0.63 1.26
29.2 0.76 1.52
24.2 0.63 1.26
0.4 0.01 0.02
2.1 0.05 0.10
0.2
22.2
24.5
24.2
29.2
24.2
0.4
2.1
0.1
31.1
0.8
0.6
27.5
39.9
25.5
28.2
1.6
0.1
0
0
31.1 0.81 1.62
0.8 0.02 0.04
0.6 0.02 0.04
27.5 0.71 1.42
39.9 1.03 2.06
25.5 0.66 1.32
28.2 0.73 1.46
1.6 0.04 0.08
3.8 0.10 0.20
VOSO4‚3H2O
V2O5
NaVO3
Pr6O11
Gd2O3
3.8
Figure 1. Plot of CH4 pressure vs turnover number (TON) of the
VO(acac)2 catalyst (0.05 mmol). The reaction of CH4 and CO (20
atm) in the presence of K2S2O8 (5.0 mmol) and CF3COOH (5 mL)
was carried out under the conditions of 80 °C, 20 h in a 120 mL
autoclave.
a CH4 (40 atm, 193 mmol), CO (20 atm, 97 mmol), catalyst (0.05 mmol),
K2S2O8 (5.0 mmol), CF3COOH (5.0 mL), 80 °C, 20 h in a 120mL autoclave.
b Turnover numbers (moles of acetic acid per mole of catalyst) determined
by GLC based on the catalyst.
As can be seen from the table, no acetic acid was formed in
the absence of catalyst. Addition of a catalytic amount (0.05
mmol) of vanadium compound increases the yield of acetic
acid. Interestingly, the vanadium-containing heteropolyacids
work as the catalyst, although the compounds are insoluble
in CF3COOH. Of the heteropolyacids tested, H7PV4Mo8O40
and H5SiVW11O40 gave high turnover numbers (TON), 29.2
and 31.1, respectively. Furthermore, simple vanadium com-
pounds such as VO(acac)2, VOSO4‚3H2O, and NaVO3 were
found to have high catalytic activity (TON: 27.5, 39.9, and
28.2, respectively, giving 0.71, 1.03, and 0.73% yields of
acetic acid based on methane, respectively). We selected
VO(acac)2 as a catalyst for the reaction of methane and CO
to convert to acetic acid because of its stability, solubility
in CF3COOH, and simplicity of the catalyst.
of CH4 pressure vs TON of the catalyst of the reaction of
methane with CO to give acetic acid. From the figure, one
can see that the TON increases with increasing methane
pressure until 20 atm. The TON became constant (ca. 30) at
pressures of methane higher than 20 atm. On the basis of
these results, a VO(acac)2/K2S2O8/CF3COOH catalyst system
was found to be one of the best catalyst systems for efficient
conversion of methane and CO to acetic acid.
To increase the yield of acetic acid based on methane, we
examined the carboxylation of methane (5 atm) under various
CO pressures in the presence of K2S2O8 (10 mmol),
CF3COOH (20 mL), and a catalytic amount of VO(acac)2
using a 25 mL stainless steel autoclave. The reaction with 2
and 5 atm of CO gave acetic acid in 37 and 45% yields based
on methane (the yields correspond to 92 and 45% based on
CO), respectively.12 The yield increased with increasing
pressure of CO and reached 93% at 20 atm. In this case, the
yields based on CO and K2S2O8 are 23 and 8.7%, respec-
tively.13 This is the highest yield of acetic acid from methane
(4) Hogeveen, H.; Lukas, J.; Roobeek, C. F. J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun. 1969, 920-921.
(5) Bagno, A.; Bukala, J.; Olah, G. A. J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 4284-
4289.
(6) Lin, M.; Sen, A. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1992, 892-893.
(7) Lin, M.; Sen, A. Nature 1994, 368, 613-615.
(8) Nizova, G. V.; Su¨ss-Fink, G.; Stanislas, S.; Shul’pin, G. B. J. Chem.
Soc., Chem. Commun. 1998, 1885-1886.
(11) From a practical point of view, expensive K2S2O8 would not be
appropriate. The investigation to substitute K2S2O8 with air (O2) is now
under way.
(12) In all cases, the oxidation of CO leading to CO2 did not occur under
these reaction conditions on the basis of gas analysis.
(9) Fujiwara, Y.; Jintoku, T.; Takaki, K. Chemtech 1990, 636-640.
(10) Presented at the Symposium on Oceanian-Japanese Organic Chem-
istry, Tokushima, Japan, December, 1996, and the International Forum on
Environmental Catalysis ’97, Tokyo, Japan, March, 1997.
558
Org. Lett., Vol. 1, No. 4, 1999