K. Sadaoka et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. 21 (2013) 6915–6919
6917
ꢁ1
ꢁ
3
ꢁ2
ꢁ1
ꢁ1
10
as follows. Chl a: 6.0 ꢀ 10 , 2.1 ꢀ 10 , and 5.1 ꢀ 10 min , 8-
ꢁ3
ꢁ3
ꢁ1
vinyl Chl a: 2.7 ꢀ ꢀ 10 , 8.9 ꢀ 10 , and 2.0 ꢀ 10 min , 3-ethyl
ꢁ3
ꢁ2
ꢁ1 22
Chl a 9.6 ꢀ 10 , 4.0 ꢀ 10 , and 1.1 min
.
The difference in the
relative ratios between Chl c and Chl a analogs would originate
1
1
from the rather stronger electronegative effect of an acrylic acid
residue than a sole vinyl group due to the conjugation of a C@C
bond with COOH. The difference in positions of substituents on
the chlorin macrocycle might also result in the difference in the ra-
tios of pheophytinization rate constants.
-
1
1
0
Pheophytinization properties of Chl c
features of the other categories of Chls c, namely Chls c
Chls c and c possess a vinyl group at the 8-position instead of
an ethyl group in Chl c . The 7-substituent is further replaced to
a methoxycarbonyl group in Chl c . The replacements of the sub-
stituents in the B-ring of Chls c and c would make them more sta-
ble to the removal of the central magnesium than Chl c because of
1
allow us to presume the
2
and c
3
.
2
3
-
2
3
1
1
0
0
3
2
3
1
-
the additional electron-withdrawing effects. Hence, all Chl c pig-
ments are tolerant to pheophytinization compared with Chl a
coexisting in Chls a/c-type antenna proteins in marine photosyn-
thetic organisms. Previous reports have demonstrated that Chl b,
which functions as light-harvesting pigments in higher plants
and green algae, is also more stable against pheophytinization than
1
-
4
-3
-3
2
× 10
10
3× 10
+
[
H ] / M
1
Figure 4. Pheophytinization rate constants of Chl c (open circle), PChlide a (open
triangle), and Chlide a (open square) in acetone/water (3/1, vol/vol) dependent on
examined proton concentrations.
1
3,14,16,19
Chl a.
Chls b/c found in light-harvesting antenna systems,
ꢁ
2
ꢁ1
ꢁ1
therefore, are rather tough against pheophytinization in oxygenic
photosynthetic organisms whereas Chl a, which is also utilized in
reaction centers, seems to be apt to release the central magnesium.
Such features of these antenna Chls might be advantageous to
metabolisms of photosynthetic light-harvesting proteins and adap-
tation to environmental changes.
a (8.8 ꢀ 10 , 3.7 ꢀ 10 , and 1.7 min ) under the same conditions.
These k-values are the average of three independent measurements,
where the standard deviations were less than 11%, 5%, and 5% of the
averaged values for Chl c , PChlide a, and Chlide a, respectively. The
1
k-values obtained from the kinetic analysis are summarized in Fig-
2
ure 4. It should be noted that the 17 -carboxy groups in the three
The slower demetalation kinetics of PChlide a than Chlide a can be
ascribed to the effects of p-macrocyclic structures, namely the por-
pigments are mainly neutral (COOH form) under the present acidic
conditions where the pH is estimated to be distributed between 2.9
and 3.4 based on the assumption of complete dissociation of hydro-
chloric acid in acetone/water (3/1), as was ensured in previous
phyrin-type and chlorin-type macrocycles for PChlide a and Chlide
a, respectively. The relative ratios of pheophytinization rate constants
between the two pigments, k (PChlide a)/k (Chlide a), were ranged
from 0.25 to 0.30 in the proton concentration range between
1
5,17
reports,
which correspond to the acrylic and propionic acid residues in Chl
and (P)Chlide a, are 4.80 and 4.76, respectively (data from
SciFinder).
Figure 4 indicates that Chl c
a
since the pK of 2-butenoic acid and butanoic acid,
ꢁ
4
ꢁ3
3
.6 ꢀ 10 and 1.4 ꢀ 10 M (the pH range between 3.4 and 2.9).
c
1
Thesevalues were not largelydifferentfromk (PChl a)/k (Chla), which
were estimatedto bewithin0.16and0.27inthe proton concentration
1
possessing a trans-acrylic acid res-
ꢁ
4
ꢁ3
range between 1.3 ꢀ 10 and 1.3 ꢀ 10 M (the pH range between
idue at the 17-position is more tolerant to removal of the central
metal than PChlide a and Chlide a possessing a propionic acid res-
idue at the same position. The kinetic stability of Chl c
the other two pigments against pheophytinization can be ascribed
to the presence of the double bond between C17 and C17 atoms
1
with the conjugated 17 -carboxy group in Chl c . It was reported
that vinyl groups directly linked to the A- and B-rings of the chlorin
macrocycle provided higher resistance to pheophytinization than
ethyl groups. The effect of the double bond in the 17-acrylic acid
residue of Chl c on pheophytinization properties demonstrated in
2
2
3
.9 and 2.9). It isnotedthat thereportedk-valuesof PChlawereesti-
ꢁ4
ꢁ3
ꢁ1
ꢁ1
matedtobe9.7 ꢀ 10 , 4.2 ꢀ ꢀ 10 , and1.4 ꢀ 10 min atthepro-
1
relative to
ꢁ4
ꢁ4
ꢁ3
ton concentrations of 1.3 ꢀ 10 , 2.5 ꢀ 10 , and 1.3 ꢀ 10 M (=pH
22
1
2
3.9,3.6,and2.9),respectively. Therefore, thedifferenceofpheophyt-
inization kinetics between PChlide a and Chlide a is quantitatively in
line with the previous report concerning (P)Chl a possessing a phytyl
2
2
2
ester at the 17-propionate residue. Comparison of demetalation
2
2
kinetics between (P)Chlide a in this study and (P)Chl a esterified with
2
2
phytol indicates that the demetalation rate constants of (P)Chlide a
are about twice larger than those of the corresponding (P)Chl a under
similar acidic conditions. The slightly faster demetalation of Chlide-
type pigments relative to Chl-type pigments would be ascribable to
differences in steric hindrance over the chlorin macrocycles by the
1
this study is in line with the effects of vinyl groups in the A- and B-
rings. Such effects can be rationalized by large electronegativity of
C@C moieties relative to C–C.22 The substituents possessing high
electron-withdrawing abilities can decrease the electron densities
of core nitrogen atoms in the chlorin macrocycle, providing higher
activation energy in proton attack to the nitrogen atoms and the
17-substituents and/or microenvironmental structures including sol-
ventmoleculesaroundpigments.Thepresentresultsonkineticstabil-
ities of chlorophyllous pigments lacking an ester group at the 17-
position should help to understand the early process of Chl degrada-
tion including the steps of pheophytinization and ester cleavage.
subsequent removal of the central metal.1
8–24
The 17-acrylic acid
residue in Chl c
zation. The relative ratios of pheophytinization rate constants of
Chl c over those of PChlide a, k (Chl c )/k (PChlide a), were esti-
mated to be 0.27 in the proton concentration range between
1
also has such substitution effects on pheophytini-
1
The logarithms of pheophytinization rate constants of Chl c ,
1
1
PChlide a, and Chlide a exhibited linear relationships with exam-
ined proton concentrations in Figure 4, in which the slopes were
determined to be 2.2, 2.2, and 2.1, respectively. These values were
consistent with those of Chl a analogs, which were reported to be
ꢁ
4
ꢁ3
3
.6 ꢀ 10 and 1.4 ꢀ 10 M (the pH range between 3.4 and 2.9).
The values were smaller than the reported ratios of k (8-vinyl Chl
a)/k (Chl a) and k (Chl a)/k (3-ethyl Chl a), which were distributed
2
2
between 0.39 and 0.63.22 It is worth noting the reported k-values of
1.9–2.2 under similar experimental conditions.
These suggest the
participation of two protons in the rate-limiting step of pheophyt-
inization of the three pigments under the acidic conditions.
Chl a, 8-vinyl Chl a, and 3-ethyl Chl a at the proton concentrations
of 1.3 ꢀ 10 , 2.5 ꢀ 10 , and 1.3 ꢀ 10 M (=pH 3.9, 3.6, and 2.9)
ꢁ
4
ꢁ4
ꢁ3