J. Gu et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 42 (2001) 1213–1215
1215
antarctica (Novo SP-435), which has a more flexible
active site showed good activity and enantioselectivity.
With lipase SP-435 (300% weight of its immobilized
form) and vinyl acetate in hexane, after 3 days, diac-
etate (+)-7 was obtained (47% yield, ]98%ee), monoac-
etate (+)-8 was recovered in 50% yield (92% ee). The
enantiomerically enriched monoacetate was resubjected
to enzymatic esterification with 100% (w/w) SP-435 to
bring the ee up to ]98% in 92% yield.19 The overall
production of enantiopure (+)-8 from ( )-8 was 46%
(out of a theoretical 50%).
donald, G.; Wie, X.; Lewis, N. Synthesis 1998, 775 and
references cited therein.
9. Johnson, C. R.; Miller, M. W. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60,
6674–6675.
10. Miller, M. W.; Johnson, C. R. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62,
1582–1583.
11. Murphy, S. T.; Bencsik, J. R.; Johnson, C. R. Org. Lett.
1999, 1, 1483–1485.
12. Kohrt, J. T.; Gu, J. X.; Johnson, C. R. J. Org. Chem.
1998, 63, 5088–5093.
13. Block, O.; Klein, G.; Altenbach, H.; Brauer, D. J. J. Org.
Chem. 2000, 65, 716–721. Hydrolysis of racemic diacetate
1 with PPL in phosphate buffer for 4 days in the presence
of Et2O give both (+)-1 and (+)-2 in 38% yield in enan-
tiopure form after recrystallization.
14. Sanfilippo, C.; Patti, A.; Nicolosi, G. Tetrahedron: Asym-
metry 2000, 11, 1043–1045. Diol (−)-2 is obtained in 48%
yield (]98% ee) and diacetate (−)-1 in 10% yield (]98%
ee) along with the corresponding monoacetate (37% yield,
]98% ee).
15. Enantiomerically pure (−)-1: white crystals (hexane/ace-
tone), mp 107–109°C; [h]D=−11.7 (c 1.0, CH2Cl2) [lit.9
mp 107–109°C; [h]D=11.7 (c 1.05, CH2Cl2) for (+)-1];
enantiopure (−)-3: white crystals (hexane/acetone), mp
147–148°C; [h]D=−36.3 (c 1.0, CH2Cl2) [lit.14 mp 147–
148°C, [h]D=25.0 (c 1.6, CHCl3) for (+)-3].
16. The enantiomeric excess was determined by NMR analy-
sis in the presence of Eu(hfc)3. Enantiopure (−)-4a: white
crystals (hexane/acetone), mp 132–133°C; [h]D=−40.0 (c
1.03, CHCl3). Enantiopure (−)-5a: white crystals (hexane/
acetone), mp 138–139°C; [h]D=−39.8 (c 1.02, CHCl3).
17. Enantiopure (−)-4b: white crystals (hexane/acetone), mp
97–99°C; [h]D=−2.64 (c 1.0, CHCl3). Enantiopure (−)-5b:
white crystals (hexane/acetone), mp 102–103°C; [h]D=
−67.2 (c 1.06, CHCl3).
In summary, we have developed an efficient method for
the preparation of a series of enantiopure mono- and
diacetates of 2,3-dibromo-5-cyclohexen-1,4-diol and
their substituted analogs. These highly functionalized
intermediates should prove useful in the synthesis of
various target molecules. As our preliminary study
shows, the bromovinyl functionality in compound (−)-
5a or (−)-4a can participate in Sonogashira or Suzuki
cross coupling reactions.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by a grant from the National
Science Foundation (CHE-9801679).
References
1. Balci, M.; Sutbeyaz, Y.; Secen, H. Tetrahedron 1990, 46,
3715.
2. Trost, B. M.; Chupak, L. S.; Lubbers, T. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1998, 120, 1732–1740.
18. (a) Kazlauskas, R. J.; Weissfloch, A. N. E.; Rappaport,
A. T.; Cuccia, L. A. J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 2656–2665;
(b) Johnson, C. R.; Golebiowski, A.; McGill, T. K.;
Steensma, D. H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32, 2597.
19. The absolute configuration of compound (+)-7 or (+)-8
has not been assigned unambiguously at this moment as
we have been unable to obtain good X-ray crystallo-
graphic data. However, based on the stereochemical pref-
erence and enantioselectivity of SP-435 observed towards
secondary alcohols in six-membered ring systems20 and
the sign of the optical rotation, stereochemistry is
assigned tentatively as depicted in Scheme 3. The enan-
tiomeric excess is determined via chiral shift reagent
analysis. Enantiopure (+)-7: white solid (hexane/ether),
mp 63–64°C; [h]D=6.0 (c 1.16, CHCl3). Enantiopure
(+)-8: white solid (hexane/ether), mp 51–52°C; [h]D=43.8
(c 1.10, CHCl3).
3. Lubineau, A.; Billault, I. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 5668–
5671.
4. (a) Higa, T.; Okuda, R. K.; Severns, R. M.; Scheuer, P.
J.; He, C.-H.; Changfu, X.; Clardy, J. Tetrahedron 1987,
43, 1063–1070; (b) Kamikubo, T.; Ogasawara, K. Tetra-
hedron Lett. 1995, 36, 1685–1688.
5. Barros, M. T.; Maycock, C. D.; Ventura, M. R. Tetra-
hedron 1999, 55, 3233–3244.
6. Kamikubo, T.; Hiroya, K.; Ogasawara, K. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1996, 37, 499–502.
7. (a) Wipf, P.; Kim, Y. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 3518–3519;
(b) Wipf, P.; Kim, Y.; Jahn, H. Synthesis 1995, 1549.
8. (a) Hara, M.; Han, M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1995,
92, 3333; (b) Sattler, I.; Grone, C.; Zeeck, A. J. Org.
Chem. 1993, 58, 6583; (c) Thiericke, R.; Zeeck, A.; Naka-
gawa, A.; Omura, S.; Herrold, R. E.; Wu, S. T. S.; Beale,
J. M.; Floss, H. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 3979;
(d) Taylor, R. J. K.; Alcaraz, L.; Kampfereyer, I.; Mac-
20. Johnson, C. R.; Sakaguchi, H. Synlett 1992, 813–816.
.
.