The Preparation of Mulberroside A and Inhibitory Effect on Tyrosinase
Results
chromatogram (Fig. 3B), also showed that a single peak was only
obtained at the retention time of 21.05 min. This monomer was
used in the following NMR analysis.
3.1 The preparation of Mulberroside A
In total, 2.0 kg powder as treated using the previously described
1
13
method. Finally, 350.68 g ethanol extract was obtained. The
content of the ethanol extract was 17.5% of the powder. Then, the
ethanol extract was dissolved in water at 2%,5% concentrations
and loaded onto a column packed with D101 macroporous resin.
Following D101 macroporous resin column chromatography, the
ethanol extract was divided into three parts: 259.19 g for the water
elution fraction (W), 76.59 g for the 30% ethanol elution fraction
3
.4 LC-MS, NMR ( H, C spectrum) Identification
The compound obtained was identified using MS and NMR.
MS spectra showed the following positive ion ESI-MS m/z
+
+
+
values: 591.2 [M+Na] , 569.2 [M+H] , 406.9 [M-162] , 245.0
+
[
M-162-162+H] , and showed that the molecular weight of the
compound was 568.2.
1
3
H-NMR (CD OD, 300 MHz) d: 7.34 (1H, d, J = 9.3 Hz, H-6),
(
E30) and 5.65 g for E100. The results suggested that the bark
ethanol extract was primarily composed of W (73.91%) and E30
21.84%) and that the volume of E100 was small (1.61%). This
7
6
.22 (1H, d, J = 16.5 Hz, a-H), 6.84 (1H, d, J = 16.5 Hz, b-H),
.68 (1H, brs, H-69), 6.54 (1H, m, H-5), 6.53 (1H, m, H-29), 6.49
1H, m, H-3), 6.36 (1H, brs, H-49), 4.79 (1H, d, J = 7.5 Hz, C-
(glc)H-10), 4.79 (1H, d, J = 7.5 Hz,C-39 (glc)H-190), and 3.85–
.21 (12H, m). Anomeric H signals in the 3.85–3.21 (12H, m) are
(
(
HPLC analysis showed that the composition of E30 was relatively
simple; therefore, subsequent experiments were focused on E30.
4
3
overlapping signals. The original NMR spectrum has been added
as Figure S1.
13
3.2 Isolation and Purification
Using RP-HPLC to analyse E30, the analysis of the 3D
3
C-NMR (CD OD, 75 MHz) d: 120.2 (C-1), 157.1 (C-2),
chromatogram (Fig. 2(A)) demonstrated that the composition of
E30 was relatively simple, and at the retention time of 21.52 min,
E30 had a single strong peak corresponded to the main ingredient
of E30. In the 3D chromatogram, the maximum absorption peak
of the main ingredient was at 324 nm. To have a clearer view of
the separation efficiency, we transferred the 2D chromatogram at
the 324 nm wavelength from the 3D chromatogram (Fig. 2(B),
blue line). As shown in Fig. 2(B), the retention time of 21.52 min
showed an extremely sharp peak. The separation efficiency was
excellent and suitable for use in the semi-preparative HPLC for
further separation and for purification. The red line shown in
Fig. 2(B) denotes the chromatogram of the main ingredient of E30
using the semi-preparative HPLC. The fraction of the peak was
collected, concentrated and lyophilised to obtain the purified
compound, which had a total weight of 8.24 g.
1
1
1
04.8 (C-3), 160.4 (C-4), 109.3 (C-5), 128.4 (C-6), 127.6 (b-C),
24.9 (a-C), 141.9 (C-19), 107.2 (C-29), 159.5 (C-39), 103.9 (C-49),
59.5 (C-59), 108.1 (C-69), 102.0 (C-4(glc)C-10), 74.8 (C-20), 77.9
(C-30), 71.3 (C-40), 78.1 (C-50), 62.4 (C-60), 102.3 (C-39 (glc)C-190),
7
4.9 (C-290), 77.9 (C-390), 71.3 (C-490), 78.1 (C-590), and 62.5 (C-
90). The original NMR spectrum has been added as Figure S2.
6
1
H-NMR (CD SOCD , 400 MHz) d: 9.80 (1H, s, OH), 9.38
3
3
(1H, s, OH),7.44 (1H, d, J = 8.4 Hz, H-6), 7.22 (1H, d,
J = 16.4 Hz, a-H), 6.94 (1H, d, J = 16.4 Hz, b-H), 6.64 (1H, brs,
H-69), 6.58 (1H, m, H-29), 6.52 (1H, d, J = 8.4 Hz, H-5), 6.55 (1H,
m, H-3), 6.35 (1H, brs, H-49), 4.79 (1H, d, J = 7.2 Hz, C-4(glc)H-
1
0), 4.79 (1H, d, J = 7.2 Hz,C-39 (glc)H-190), 5.24 (2H, dd,
J = 10.0 Hz, 4.4 Hz), 5.10 (4H, m), 4.51 (2H, d, J = 6.4 Hz),
.70 (2H, m), 3.50 (3H, m), and 3.18–3.30 (7H, m). Both anomeric
3
H signals in the 3.50 (3H, m) and 3.18–3.30 (7H, m) are
overlapping signals. The original NMR spectrum has been added
as Figure S3.
3.3 RP-HPLC-DAD analysis
There were no other interfering peaks, except at the retention
1
13
1
By comparing the H-NMR (CD OD), C-NMR and H-
3
9, 16
time of 21.05 min in the 3D chromatogram (Fig. 3A), which
showed that the compound obtained by semi-preparative HPLC
was of high purity. Transferring the 200–500 nm UV-visible scan
spectra from the 3D chromatogram (Fig. 3C) showed that the
compound had a maximum absorption value at 324 nm. The 2D
chromatogram at 324 nm, which was transferred from the 3D
NMR (CD SOCD ) data with the literature
3
, the compound
3
was identified as oxyresveratrol-4-O-b-D-glucopyranosyl-39-O-b-
D-glucopyranoside or mulberroside A (MA). Its molecular formula
is C H O , and the structure is shown in Fig. 1.
2
6
32 14
Figure 2. 3D (A) and 2D profiles (B) of E30 fraction on analytic and prepared HPLC-DAD.
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0109396.g002
PLOS ONE | www.plosone.org
4
October 2014 | Volume 9 | Issue 10 | e109396