1824
J.Y. Xiang et al. / Electrochimica Acta 55 (2010) 1820–1824
val between the cathodic and anodic peaks can be suggested as the
needle-like CuO electrode exhibits a smaller polarization than the
bird nest-like CuO. As is well known, the transferring delay of elec-
trons and lithium ions on the active material/electrolyte interface is
one of the main causes for the polarization in lithium ion batteries
[27]. Therefore, the results of the CV curves show that the electrons
and lithium ions can transfer more actively in needle-like CuO due
to the better contact between the CuO needles and electrolyte.
4. Conclusions
Hierarchical, nanostructured CuO spheres with needle-like
morphology were successfully prepared in a stirred solution of
Cu(Ac)2·H2O and NH3·H2O by using CTAB as a surfactant. The
hierarchical nanostructure of CuO has some influence on the elec-
trochemical performance. The needle-like CuO obtained in the
presence of CTAB shows better high rate properties than that of
bird nest-like CuO prepared without CTAB. It is attributed to the
larger specific surface area of needle-like CuO, leading to sufficient
contact area for CuO/electrolyte, shortened the diffusion length of
Li+, and enhanced reactivity of electrode reaction during cycling.
In addition, the needle-like morphology can be sustained well
after cycling. Therefore, the hierarchical structured CuO sphere
with needle-like morphology synthesized through this simple and
low-cost method is an extremely promising anode for lithium ion
batteries.
References
[1] P. Poizot, S. Laruelle, S. Grugeon, L. Dupont, J.M. Tarascon, Nature 407 (2000)
496.
[2] S. Mitra, P. Poizot, A. Finke, J.M. Tarascon, Adv. Funct. Mater. 16 (2006) 2281.
[3] Y.M. Kang, M.S. Song, J.H. Kim, H.S. Kim, M.S. Park, J.Y. Lee, H.K. Liu, S.X. Dou,
Electrochim. Acta 50 (2005) 3667.
[4] X.H. Huang, J.P. Tu, C.Q. Zhang, J.Y. Xiang, Electrochem. Commun. 9 (2007) 1180.
[5] Q.M. Pan, H.Z. Jin, H.B. Wang, G.P. Yin, Electrochim. Acta 53 (2007) 951.
[6] S. Grugeon, S. Laruelle, R. Herrera-Urbina, L. Dupont, P. Poizot, J.M. Tarascon, J.
Electrochem. Soc. 148 (2001) A285.
Fig. 7. The discharge–charge curves for CuO electrodes prepared (a) in the absence
of CTAB and (b) in the presence of CTAB.
[7] M.H. Cao, C.W. Hu, Y.H. Wang, Y.H. Guo, C.X. Guo, C.X. Guo, E.B. Wang, Chem.
Commun. (2003) 1884.
[8] X.P. Gao, J.L. Bao, G.L. Pan, H.Y. Zhu, P.X. Huang, F. Wu, D.Y. Song, J. Phys. Chem.
B 108 (2004) 5547.
[9] Z.H. Yang, J. Xu, W.X. Zhang, A.P. Liu, S.P. Tang, J. Solid State Chem. 180 (2007)
1390.
[10] J.Y. Xiang, J.P. Tu, Y.F. Yuan, X.L. Wang, X.H. Huang, Z.Y. Zeng, Electrochim. Acta
54 (2009) 1160.
[11] F.S. Ke, L. Huang, G.Z. Wei, L.J. Xue, J.T. Li, B. Zhang, S.R. Chen, X.Y. Fan, S.G. Sun,
Electrochim. Acta 54 (2009) 5825.
[12] L.B. Chen, N. Lu, C.M. Xu, H.C. Yu, T.H. Wang, Electrochim. Acta 54 (2009) 4198.
[13] S.Y. Gao, S.X. Yang, J. Shu, S.X. Zhang, Z.D. Li, K. Jiang, J. Phys. Chem. C 112 (2008)
19324.
[14] Q.T. Pan, K. Huang, S.B. Ni, F. Yang, S.M. Lin, D.Y. He, J. Alloys Compd. 484 (2009)
322.
[15] J. Morales, L. Sanchez, F. Martin, J.R. Ramos-Barrado, M. Sanchez, Electrochim.
Acta 49 (2004) 4589.
[16] S.Q. Wang, J.Y. Zhang, C.H. Chen, Scripta Mater. 57 (2007) 337.
[17] S. Anandan, X. Wen, S. Yang, Mater. Chem. Phys. 93 (2005) 35.
[18] H.G. Yu, J.G. Yu, S.W. Liu, S. Mann, Chem. Mater. 19 (2007) 4327.
[19] X.M. Sun, X. Chen, Z.X. Deng, Y.D. Li, Mater. Chem. Phys. 78 (2002) 99.
[20] H. Wang, J.Z. Xu, J.J. Zhu, H.Y. Chen, J. Cryst. Growth 244 (2002) 88.
[21] A. Debart, L. Dupont, P. Poizot, J.B. Leriche, J.M. Tarascon, J. Electrochem. Soc.
[22] G. Gachot, S. Grugeon, M. Armand, S. Pilard, P. Guenot, J.M. Tarascon, S. Laruelle,
J. Power Sources 178 (2008) 409.
[23] Y.H. Lee, I.C. Leu, S.T. Chang, C.L. Liao, K.Z. Fung, Electrochim. Acta 50 (2004)
553.
Fig. 8. The first cyclic voltammogram curves of CuO electrodes prepared (a) in the
absence of CTAB and (b) in the presence of CTAB at a scan rate of 0.1 mV s−1 from 0
to 3.0 V.
[24] H.B. Wang, Q.M. Pan, J.W. Zhao, G.P. Yin, P.J. Zuo, J. Power Sources 167 (2007)
206.
[25] X.H. Huang, J.P. Tu, Y.Z. Yang, J.Y. Xiang, Electrochem. Commun. 10 (2008) 16.
[26] H.C. Liu, S.K. Yen, J. Power Sources 166 (2007) 478.
[27] D. Aurbach, B. Markovsky, I. Weissman, E. Levi, Y. Ein-Eli, Electrochim. Acta 45
(1999) 67.
peaks correspond well with the discharge–charge plateaus in Fig. 7.
Compared to the bird nest-like CuO, the cathodic peaks of the
needle-like CuO are located at relatively high potentials. The anodic
peaks of both electrodes are almost at the same locations. The inter-