‡
2
General procedure for 6b–d: to a solution of the corresponding fluoride
a–d (0.2 mmol) in monoglyme or THF (5 ml) has added 0.06 g (0.42
mmol) of 1. The use of corresponding bifluorides gave the same products
but the molar ratio of bifluoride to silane was 1:3 in this case. Selected data
for 6b–d: d
F
263.67 (6b), 263.94 (6c), 263.82 (6d), 264.83 (2b), 264.75
(2d).
§
Synthesis of 6a: to a solution of 0.41 g (1.49 mmol) 2a in 5 ml monoglyme
was condensed 0.45 g (3.13 mmol) 1 and the mixture stirred for 3 h at
2
55 °C, d
Crystal data for 6a: C11
/m, a = 769.8(2), b = 1132.1(2), c = 1135.6(2) Å, b 105.26(1)°,
F
264.04. Yield: 95%.
¶
27 6 3
H F N SSi, M = 375.51, monoclinic, space
group P2
V = 0.9548(3) nm , Z = 2, D
Siemens P4 m/v diffractometer, q-2q-scan type, 2.59 @ q @ 24.99°, 173 K;
512 reflections collected, 1775 independent reflections (Rint = 0.0672),
1
3
23
c
= 1.306 g cm , l(Mo-Ka) = 0.71073 Å.
6
2
2
full-matrix least-squares on F , goodness-of-fit (F ) = 1.064, final R values
I > 2s(I)]: R1 = 0.0476, wR2 = 0.1002, R values (all data): R1 = 0.0774,
wR2 0·1157, extinction coefficient 0.0103(18), difference electron
[
=
3
suppdata/cc/1999/1017/ for crystallographic files in .cif format.
∑
Selected data for 2b: d
0.18 (s, Me Si), 3.10 (s, Me
and angles for the anion [Me SiF
within the standard deviation.
† Selected data for 7: bp 166–170 °C (decomp.). d
F
(CD
3
CN, 230 °C) 260.10; d
4
2
2
] in 2b are almost identical with those for
H
(CD
3
CN, 230 °C)
+
2
3
N ). The geometry parameters, bond lengths
3
12
2
†
d
a
Fig. 1 Crystal structure of 6a with thermal ellipsoids. Selected bond lengths
pm) and angles (°): Si(1)–C(1) 205.6(4), Si(1)–C(2) 206.2(4), Si(1)–C(3)
88.2(5), Si(1)–C(4) 188.6(3); C(3)–Si(1)–C(4) 120.85(12), C(3)–Si(1)–
2.33 (5JFH 1.23 Hz);
], 2JCF 23.7
, JCF 305.6 Hz), 94.24 [C(NMe
3
, JCF 2.3 Hz).
H
(
1
1
F
262.48; d
C
127.35 (CF
3
2 3
)
4
Hz), 39.36 (CH
C(1) 91.0(2), C(3)–Si(1)–C(2) 89.6(2), C(1)–Si(1)–C(2) 179.40(19).
1
2
G. K. S. Prakash, R. Krishnamurti and G. A. Olah, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
1989, 111, 393.
I. Ruppert, K. K. Schlich and W. Volbach, Tetrahedron Lett., 1984, 25,
products16 of difluorocarbene with monoglyme or THF were
not detected. Addition of 1 to 3c in THF at 280 °C afforded 6c
2
195.
F
(d 263.7) as the sole product, which upon warming to 250 °C
3
4
D. J. Burton and Z. Y. Yang, Tetrahedron, 1992, 48, 189.
G. K. S. Prakash and A. K. Yudin, Chem. Rev., 1997, 97, 757.
gave slowly (Me
formation of 7 proceeds much faster and was complete in 1 h
along with gaseous Me SiF and CF H impurity.†† In the case of
2 3 3
N) CCF 7 and 1 (Scheme 1), at 230 °C the
5 (a) A. A. Kolomeitsev, V. N. Movchun and Yu. L. Yagupolskii,
Synthesis, 1990, 1151; (b) A. A. Kolomeitsev, V. N. Movchun and
Yu. L. Yagupolskii, W. Porwisiak and W. Dmowskii, Tetrahedron Lett.,
3
3
hydrogen difluorides and compound 1, a 1:3 ratio has to be
applied to convert 4b–d at 280 °C into the fluorides 3b–d
1
992, 41, 6191.
(a) C. R. J. P. Corriu, C. Reye and J. C. Young, Chem. Rev., 1993, 93,
371; (c) R. Damrauer and J. A. Hankin, Chem. Rev., 1995, 95, 1145; (b)
6
3 3
under formation of CF H and Me SiF (Scheme 1) and
1
subsequently 6b–d are formed.
Probably the siliconates
(CF )Si(F)Me anion were produced initially as inter-
3 3
mediates releasing [CF SiMe yielding
D. J. Adams, J. H. Clark, L. B. Hansen, V. C. Sanders and S. J. Tavener,
J. Fluorine Chem., 1998, 92, 123.
(a) H. J. Frohn and V. V. Bardin, J. Organomet. Chem., 1995, 501, 155
and references cited therein; (b) A. S. Pilcher and P. DeShong, J. Org.
Chem., 1996, 61, 6901.
5a–d
containing
the
2
3
]
[
3
7
2
3
]
to attack CF
2
3 2 3
) SiMe ] . So far, there is no direct spectroscopical
[
(CF
2
observation of [(CF
3
)Si(F)Me
3
] , whereas the isoelectronic
8 (a) H. Beckers, H. B u¨ rger and R. Eujen, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem., 1988,
563, 39; (b) A. H. J. F. de Keijzer, F. J. J. de Kanter, M. Schakel, R. F.
Schmitz and G. W. Klumpp, Angew. Chem., 1996, 108, 1183 and
references therein.
phosphorane, (CF
3
)P(F)Me could be isolated and fully char-
3
acterized.17
The single crystal X-ray structure determination of 6a
showed almost ideal trigonal-bipyramidal geometry at silicon
3 3
)
F]2 even
9
Because of the high phosphorus affinity to fluorine, [P(CF
being treated with excess of Me SiCF cannot be transformed
] , cf. A. A. Kolomeitsev and G.-V.
3
3
[
C(1)–Si(1)–C(2) 179.40(19), C(3)–Si–C(1) 91.0(2) and C(3)–
2
3 4
quantitatively into [P(CF )
4
Si–C(4) 120.85(12)°] with a rather long apical Si–C(1)F
3
bond
R o¨ schenthaler, 12th ACS Winter Fluorine Conference, St. Petersburg
Beach, FL, USA, January 22–27, 1995, abstract 48.
[
205.6(4)] and a considerably shorter equatorial Si–C(1)H
3
12
bond [188.2(5) pm] (cf. 187.4 pm in 2a ). For the isoelectronic
CF PMe the same structure was found with shorter P–C
distances [P–CF 197.4(4) and P–CH 181.3(2) pm]. The
10 A. A. Kolomeitsev, N. V. Pavlenko, A. B. Rozhenko, U. Dieckbreder,
M. G o¨ rg and G.-V. R o¨ schenthaler, 15th International Symposium on
Fluorine Chemistry, Vancouver, Canada, August 2–7, 1997, Abstract In
(2) C-6.
(
3
)
2
3
18
3
3
+
2 3
geometry parameters of the cation (Me N) S are similar to
those investigated earlier.12
11 W. J. Middleton, US Pat. N3, 940, 402, 1976.
1
1
1
2 D. A. Dixon, W. B. Farnham, W. Heilemann, R. Mews and M.
Noltemeyer, Heteroat. Chem., 1993, 4, 287 and references therein.
3 A. A. Kolomeitsev, F. U. Seifert and G.-V. R o¨ schenthaler, J. Fluorine
Chem., 1995, 71, 47.
4 S. M. Igumnov, N. I. Delyagina and I. L. Knunyants, Izv. Akad. Nauk
SSSR, Ser. Khim., 1986, 1193 and references therein.
The use of the hypervalent trifluoromethylating silicon
compounds for new carbon–carbon bond forming reactions and
synthesis of trifluoromethylated phosphorus(v) derivatives is
underway in our laboratories. The results of the study for
CF
anion sources including (Et
Me N) CCF will be published in due course.
A. A. K. is grateful to the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
for financial support. The generous gift of CF SiMe by Bayer
3
SiF
3
and CF
3
SiPh
3
interaction with the different fluoride
2
N) PF and Ph CF and reactions of
3
2
3
15 A. A. Kolomeitsev, N. V. Kirij, W. K. Appel, S. V. Pazenok, G.-V.
R o¨ schenthaler, 14th ACS Winter Fluorine Conference, St. Petersburg
Beach, January 17–22, 1999, abstract 37.
(
2
3
3
1
6 (a) R. M o¨ ckel, W. Tyrra and D. Naumann, J. Fluorine Chem., 1995, 73,
29 and references therein; (b) C.-M. Hu, F.-L. Qing and C.-X. Shen,
3
3
2
AG, Leverkusen (Germany) is gratefully acknowledged.
J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1, 1993, 335.
1
7 A. A. Kolomeitsev, Yu. L. Yagupolskij, A. Gentzsch, E. Lork and G.-V.
R o¨ schenthaler, Phosphorus, Sulfur Silicon, 1994, 92, 179.
8 A. A. Kolomeitsev, U. Dieckbreder, M. G o¨ rg and G.-V. R o¨ schenthaler,
Phosphorus Sulfur Silicon, 1996, 109–110, 597.
Notes and references
1
†
All reactions were performed under nitrogen in carefully dried solvents.
Compound 7 gave satisfactory elemental analysis. NMR spectra at 200.13
1
19
13
(
H, TMS), 188.31 ( F, CClF
3
), 50.32 MHz ( C, TMS) were recorded.
Communication 9/01953G
1018
Chem. Commun., 1999, 1107–1108