2522 J . Org. Chem., Vol. 67, No. 8, 2002
McDonald et al.
with an ice bath. A solution of Oxone (2.55 g, 4.15 mmol) in
aqueous Na2 (EDTA) (4 × 10-4 M, 20.0 mL) and a solution of
K2CO3 (2.49 g, 18.0 mmol) in water (20.0 mL) were added
dropwise through two separate addition funnels over a period
of 1.5 h. The pH value of the reaction mixture was kept
between 10.3 and 10.5. At this point, the reaction was
immediately quenched by addition of EtOAc and water. The
mixture was extracted with EtOAc, washed with brine, and
dried over MgSO4. After removal of volatiles by rotary evapo-
ration, the crude product 17 was dissolved in anhydrous CH2-
Cl2 (20 mL) and sequentially treated with DMAP (10 mg),
triethylamine (2.10 mL, 15 mmol), and acetic anhydride (0.55
mL, 6.0 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred for 1 h at
room temperature and then washed with water (2 × 7 mL)
and brine (7 mL); the organic layer was dried over MgSO4 and
then concentrated to give the crude acetylated product.
Purification by silica gel flash chromatography (6:1 hexanes/
EtOAc) provided compound 31 (630 mg, 93% yield). The
enantiomeric excess was determined on the basis of the
corresponding benzoate ester derived from 17 to be 98% ee by
HPLC analysis. Conditions for HPLC analysis: column,
Chiralpak OD(H) 0.46 cm φ × 25 cm; eluent, 9:1 hexanes/2-
propanol; flow rate, 1.0 mL/min; 254 nm; temp ) 25 °C; R,R,R-
isomer, tR ) 6.97 min; S,S,S-isomer, tR ) 16.0 min). IR (neat)
2964, 2930, 1744, 1378, 1235, 1037 cm-1; 1H NMR (300 MHz,
CDCl3) δ 4.31 (AB dd, J ) 12.0, 4.5 Hz, 1H), 4.04 (AB dd, J )
12.0, 6.9 Hz, 1H), 3.01 (dd, J ) 6.9, 4.5 Hz, 1H), 2.70 (m, 1H),
2.09 (s, 3H), 1.90-1.76 (m, 1H), 1.72-1.49 (m, 3H), 1.33 (s,
3H), 1.30 (s, 3H), 1.26 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) δ
170.06, 63.83, 63.45, 60.33, 59.49, 58.68, 34.97, 25.00, 24.54,
20.99, 18.86, 17.20. Anal. Calcd for C12H20O4: C, 63.14; H, 8.83.
Found: C, 63.16; H, 8.86.
and trans-stereoselective oxacyclization of 1,5-, 1,5,9-, and
1,5,9,13-polyepoxides by reaction with Lewis acids. De-
spite some limitations with regard to substituent pat-
terns and the nature of the nucleophilic terminating
group,37 such tandem oxacyclizations have great potential
in providing efficient syntheses of structurally complex
polycyclic ether natural products, particularly when one
considers the ease of substrate synthesis.
Exp er im en ta l Section
1
Gen er a l. H NMR and 13C NMR spectra were recorded at
either 300 MHz on a Varian Mercury-300 or 400 MHz on an
Inova-400 spectrometer. NMR spectra were recorded on solu-
tions in deuterated chloroform (CDCl3), with residual chloro-
form (δ 7.26 ppm for 1H NMR and δ 77.23 ppm for 13C NMR)
taken as the internal standard, and were reported in parts
per million (ppm). Abbreviations for signal coupling are as
follows: s, singlet; d, doublet; t, triplet; q, quartet; m, multiplet.
IR spectra were collected on a Mattson Genesis II FT-IR
spectrometer as neat films. Mass spectra (low- and high-
resolution FAB) were recorded on a VG 70-S Nier J ohason
Mass Spectrometer. Elemental analyses were performed by
Atlantic Microlab, Inc, Norcross, GA. Analytical Thin Layer
Chromatography (TLC) was performed on precoated glass-
backed plates purchased from Whatman (silica gel 60 F254; 0.25
mm thickness). Flash column chromatography was carried out
with silica gel 60 (230-400 mesh ASTM) from EM Science.
All reactions were carried out with anhydrous solvents in
oven- or flame-dried and nitrogen- or argon-charged glassware.
All anhydrous solvents except as mentioned were freshly
distilled. All the solvents used in workup extraction procedures
and chromatography were used as received from commercial
suppliers without prior purification. During reaction workup,
the reaction mixture was usually diluted to three times the
original volume and washed with an equal volume of water
and/or aqueous solutions as needed. Purified and redistilled
boron trifluoride diethyl etherate (BF3‚OEt2) was purchased
from Aldrich. All other reagents were purchased from Aldrich.
R ep r esen t a t ive P r oced u r es for Syn t h esis of P oly-
ep oxid e Su bstr a tes: (R,R,R)-Diep oxid e-a ceta te (31). To
a 250 mL three-neck round-bottom flask were added buffer
(0.05 M Na2B4O7‚10H2O in 4 × 10-4 M aqueous Na2(EDTA),
30 mL), acetonitrile (15 mL), dimethoxymethane (30 mL),
(2R,3R)-3-methyl-3-(4-methyl-3-pentenyl)oxiranemethanol ((+)-
2,3-epoxygeraniol,19 509 mg, 2.92 mmol), tetrabutylammonium
hydrogen sulfate (73 mg, 0.215 mmol), and 1,2:4,5-di-O-
isopropylidene-D-erythro-2,3-hexodiuro-2,6-pyranose (Shi’s cata-
lyst, 15,18 280 mg, 1.08 mmol). The reaction mixture was cooled
(R,R,R)-Diep oxid e-ter t-bu tyl Ca r bon a te (39). Diepoxy-
alcohol 17 (135 mg, 0.725 mmol, prepared as described above)
was dissolved in anhydrous CH2Cl2 (20 mL) and sequentially
treated with DMAP (5 mg), triethylamine (0.53 mL, 3.75
mmol), and di-tert-butyl dicarbonate (288 mg, 1.32 mmol). The
reaction mixture was stirred for 1 h at room temperature and
then washed with water (2 × 2 mL) and brine (2 mL); the
organic layer was dried over MgSO4 and then concentrated to
give the crude Boc-protected product. Purification by silica gel
flash chromatography provided compound 39 (191 mg, 92%)
as a colorless oil: IR (neat) 2977, 2932, 1744, 1459, 1373, 1279,
1
1257, 1164, 1095 cm-1; H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 4.06-
4.17 (m, 2H), 2.99 (t, J ) 5.4 Hz, 1H), 2.66 (t, J ) 6.0 Hz, 1H),
1.80-1.72 (m, 1H), 1.69-1.50 (m, 3H), 1.43 (s, 9H), 1.27 (s,
3H), 1.24 (s, 3H), 1.20 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ
153.1, 82.4, 65.3, 63.5, 60.0, 58.9, 58.3, 34.6, 27.6, 24.7, 24.2,
18.5, 16.8. Anal. Calcd for C15H26O5: C, 62.91; H, 9.15.
Found: C, 63.00; H, 9.19.
(R,R,R,R,R)-Tr iep oxid e-ter t-bu tyl Ca r bon a te (62): IR
(neat) 2971, 2932, 1743, 1460, 1279, 1164, 861 cm-1; 1H NMR
(400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 4.18 (AB dd, J ) 11.6, 5.2 Hz, 1H), 4.11
(AB dd, J ) 12.0, 6.0 Hz, 1H), 3.01 (t, J ) 5.6 Hz, 1H), 2.74-
2.66 (m, 2H), 1.82-1.70 (m, 2H), 1.70-1.54 (m, 6H), 1.47 (s,
9H), 1.31 (s, 3H), 1.28 (s, 3H), 1.25 (s, 3H), 1.24 (s, 3H); 13C
NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 153.43, 82.81, 65.56, 63.97, 62.64,
60.58, 60.26, 59.21, 58.61, 35.32, 34.82, 27.88, 25.01, 24.74,
24.32, 18.82, 17.12, 16.77.
(R,R,R,R,R,R,R)-Tetr aepoxide-ter t-bu tyl Car bon ate (66):
1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 4.18 (dd, J ) 12.0, 5.2 Hz, 1H),
4.11 (dd, J ) 12.0, 6.0 Hz, 1H), 3.03 (t, J ) 5.6 Hz, 1H), 2.74-
2.64 (m, 3H), 1.80-1.50 (m, 12H), 1.47 (s, 9H), 1.30 (s, 3H),
1.28 (s, 3H), 1.24 (s, 3H), 1.24 (s, 3H), 1.23 (s, 3H); 13C NMR
(100 MHz) δ 153.1, 82.6, 65.3, 63.9, 63.7, 62.5, 62.4, 60.3, 60.0,
59.0, 58.3, 35.1, 35.0, 34.6, 27.6, 24.7, 24.5, 24.3, 24.1, 18.6,
16.9, 16.5 (2C).
Rep r esen ta tive P r oced u r es for BF 3-Ca ta lyzed En d o-
Oxa cycliza tion s: Oxep a n e-F u sed Cyclic Ca r bon a te (40),
t h e Byp r od u ct ter t-Bu t yl E t h er (41), a n d t h e Der ived
Aceta te (36) a n d p-Br om oben zoa te Ester s (42). Diepoxide-
tert-butyl carbonate 39 (248 mg, 0.87 mmol) was added to a
50 mL, oven-dried, round-bottom flask containing a magnetic
stir bar, and anhydrous CH2Cl2 (5 mL) was added under an
inert atmosphere. The solution was stirred and cooled to -40
(35) Colorless crystals of 73 (C16H26O5) were grown from slow
evaporation of a solution of 73 in CD2Cl2. Data collection was conducted
at 100 K on an orthorhombic crystal, P212121; a ) 7.19550(10) Å, b )
11.12840(10) Å, c ) 18.5031(2) Å; V ) 1481.62(3) Å3; Z ) 4; R1
0.0271, wR2 ) 0.0602, GOF ) 1.006.
)
(36) Several natural products exhibit similar cyclohexane structures
trans-fused to oxepanes, which might be derived from compound 73:
(a) Sipholenols: Carmely, S.; Kashman, Y. J . Org. Chem. 1983, 48,
3517. (b) Sodwanones: Rudi, A.; Goldberg, I.; Stein, Z.; Benayahu, Y.;
Schleyer, M.; Kashman, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, 34, 3943. (c)
Raspacionin: Cimino, G.; Epifanio, R.; Madaio, A.; Puliti, R.; Trivellone,
E. J . Nat. Prod. 1993, 56, 1622. (d) Rudi, A.; Yosief, T.; Schleyer, M.;
Kashman, Y. Tetrahedron 1999, 55, 5555. (e) Review: Ferna´ndez, J .
J .; Souto, M. L.; Norte, M. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2000, 17, 235.
(37) Endo-selective polyene carbocyclizations to fused polycyclohex-
anoid products exhibit similar substrate requirements. For recent
examples, see: (a) Corey, E. J .; Luo, G. L.; Lin, L. S. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 1126. (b) Sen, S. E.; Zhang, Y. Z.; Smith, S. M. J .
Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 4459. (c) Zoretic, P. A.; Fang, H.; Ribeiro, A. A.
J . Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 7213. (d) Aggarwal, V. K.; Bethel, P. A.; Giles,
R. J . Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1999, 3315. (e) Yang, D.; Ye, X.-Y.;
Gu, S.; Xu, M. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 5579. (f) Bender, J . A.;
Arif, A. M.; West, F. G. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 7443. (g)
Bogensta¨tter, M.; Limberg, A.; Overman, L. E.; Tomasi, A. L. J . Am.
Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 12206. (h) Ishihara, K.; Ishibashi, H.; Yamamoto,
H. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 1505. (i) Goeller, F.; Heinemann, C.;
Demuth, M. Synthesis 2001, 1114.