-
Synthesis of Salts Containing the BrO3F2 Anion
A R T I C L E S
1/4-in. o.d. FEP vessel. After crystal growth was complete, the solvent
was decanted into the sidearm of the T-reactor and cooled to -196
°C, and the sidearm was heat-sealed off and removed under dynamic
vacuum. The colorless, tetragonal-shaped crystals were dried under
dynamic vacuum at -40 °C and stored at -78 °C until mounted on
the diffractometer. Crystals of [NO]2[BrO3F2][F] were grown by
(e) Calculations. The energy-minimized gas-phase structures,
vibrational frequencies, atomic charges, Mayer bond orders, and
valencies were calculated by use of the HF, MP2, and LDF
(MPW1PW91) methods using Gaussian 98.90 The 6-311G(d) (HF, MP2)
and DZVP (MPW1PW91) basis sets were used in each case. The
-
enthalpies of fluoride ion attachment to ClO3F, BrO3F, and BrO3F2
1
sublimation of the initial product under 1000 Torr of Ar in a /4-in.
were calculated by use of the Gaussian-2 (G2) method.
The internal force constants of BrO3F2-, XeO3F2, and OsO3F2 were
FEP vessel over the course of several weeks while stored in a dewar
filled with solid dry ice. The colorless, block-shaped crystals ac-
cumulated in the cooler upper region of the vessel where fresh dry ice
had been added daily.
(ii) Crystal Mounting and Data Collection. A single crystal of
[N(CH3)4][BrO3F2] was mounted on a glass fiber at -110 ( 5 °C using
a Fomblin oil as an adhesive.85 A crystal of [NO]2[BrO3F2][F] was
mounted in a similar fashion; however, the substantial dissociation vapor
pressure of this salt and its tendency to sublime in a cold stream of dry
N2 at -110 °C required that it be mounted at -150 °C.
determined by the Wilson FG-matrix method74 using the software
package SVIB.91 The experimental geometry was used for BrO3F2
,
-
and the calculated LDF (MPW1PW91) values were used for XeO3F2
-
and OsO3F2 monomer. The symmetry force constants of BrO3F2
,
ClO3F2-, XeO3F2, and OsO3F2 were determined by use of the B-matrix
method using the second derivative potential energy matrixes obtained
from their calculated structures (SVWN/DZVP) and the software
package B-matrix.75
Acknowledgment. We thank the donors of the Petroleum
Research Fund, administered by the American Chemical Society,
for support of this work under ACS-PRF No. 37128-AC3
(G.J.S.), and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research
Council of Canada for a postgraduate scholarship and McMaster
University for a Dalley Fellowship (J.F.L.). We are grateful to
Prof. David A. Dixon for his assistance with the use of the
B-matrix software package and to Dr. He´le`ne P. A. Mercier
for her considerable assistance in preparing and critiquing this
manuscript.
Mounted crystals were centered on a P4 Siemens diffractometer
(-173 °C) equipped with a Siemens SMART 1K CCD area detector,
a rotating molybdenum anode (λK R ) 0.71073 Å, monochromated by
a graphite crystal) and controlled by SMART.86 The distance between
the crystal and the detector face was 4.970 ([NO]2[BrO3F2][F]) or 4.987
cm ([N(CH3)4][BrO3F2]), and the data sets were collected in 512 ×
512 pixel mode using 2 × 2 pixel binning. The raw diffraction data
sets were integrated and scaled as previously described49 using
SAINT+87 and SADABS.88
(iii) Solution and Refinement. The program XPREP89 was used to
confirm unit cell dimensions and space groups. Direct methods were
used to locate the bromine atoms, and the lighter atom positions were
identified in successive difference Fourier syntheses. Final refinements
were obtained using data that had been corrected for absorption by
introducing an extinction coefficient and were optimized using aniso-
tropic thermal parameters for all atoms except the hydrogen atoms of
the N(CH3)4+ cation. Attempts to constrain the bond angles and/or bond
lengths of the anion in the disordered structure of [N(CH3)4][BrO3F2]
did not improve the global solution and therefore were not utilized in
the final refinement of the structure.
Supporting Information Available: Calculated vibrational
-
frequencies of BrO3F2 and ClO3F2-; stretching frequency
-
trends among BrO3F2 salts; factor-group analysis of the
-
BrO3F2 anion in [NO]2[BrO3F2][F]; calculated geometries of
fac-BrO3F32- and mer-BrO3F32- and enthalpies of fluoride ion
attachment to BrO3F2- (complementary discussion); calculated
-
vibrational frequencies and intensities for the BrO3F2 and
-
ClO3F2- anions (Table S1); factor-group analysis of the BrO3F2
(c) NMR Spectroscopy. The solution 19F (470.592 MHz), 1H
(500.130 MHz), and 13C (125.758 MHz) spectra of [N(CH3)4][BrO3F2]
in CH3CN solvent at -40 °C were recorded on a Bruker DRX-500
(11.7438 T) spectrometer operating in unlocked mode (field drift <
0.1 Hz h-1) using a 5-mm 1H/13C/19F/31P QNP probe. The spectra were
externally referenced to neat CFCl3 (19F) and Si(CH3)4 (1H, 13C) at 27
°C. The following acquisition parameters were used: pulse widths 2.3
(19F), 7.7 (1H), 12.8 (13C) µs; acquisition times 0.174 (19F), 2.42 (1H),
0.565 (13C) s; spectral widths 18.8 (19F), 6.8 (1H), 29.0 (13C) kHz. Free
induction decays were recorded in 32 K memories, zero filled to 64 K
memories and Fourier transformed, resulting in data point resolutions
of 2.9 (19F), 0.21 (1H), 0.88 (13C) Hz/data point.
anion in [NO]2[BrO3F2][F] (Table S2); calculated geometric
2-
parameters of BrO3F2-, ClO3F2-, and BrO3F3 (Table S3);
calculated gas-phase enthalpies of fluoride ion attachment (Table
S4); potential energy distributions for BrO3F2-, XeO3F2, and
OsO3F2 derived from GVFF analyses (Table S5); the disordered
structure of [N(CH3)4][BrO3F2] (Figure S1); displacement
-
vectors for the fundamental vibrational modes of the BrO3F2
anion (Figure S2); and X-ray crystallographic files (CIF format)
for the structure determinations of [NO]2[BrO3F2][F] and
[N(CH3)4][BrO3F2]. This material is available free of charge
(d) Vibrational Spectroscopy. Raman spectra were recorded on a
Bruker RFS 100 FT-Raman spectrometer at -163 °C using 1064-nm
excitation as previously described.85 The infrared spectrum of
â-[Cs][BrO3F2] was recorded on a Bio-Rad FTS-40 spectrometer at
ambient temperature. The three-layered AgCl pellet of [Cs][BrO3F2]
was fabricated in a drybox by use of a Wilks mini-press, with the
external layers being composed of AgCl and the central layer being a
mixture of the sample and AgCl.
JA0402607
(90) Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.; Robb, M.
A.; Cheeseman, J. R.; Zakrzewski, V. G.; Montgomery, J. A., Jr.; Stratmann,
R. E.; Burant, J. C.; Dapprich, S.; Millam, J. M.; Daniels, A. D.; Kudin,
K. N.; Strain, M. C.; Farkas, O.; Tomasi, J.; Barone, V.; Cossi, M.; Cammi,
R.; Mennucci, B.; Pomelli, C.; Adamo, C.; Clifford, S.; Ochterski, J.;
Petersson, G. A.; Ayala, P. Y.; Cui, Q.; Morokuma, K.; Salvador, P.;
Dannenberg, J. J.; Malick D. K.; Rabuck, A. D.; Raghavachari, K.;
Foresman, J. B.; Ciosloski, J.; Ortiz, J. V.; Baboul, A. G.; Stefanov, B. B.;
Lui, G.; Liashenko, A.; Piskorz, P.; Komaromi, I.; Gomperts, R.; Martin,
R. L.; Fox, D. J.; Keith, T.; Al-Laham, M. A.; Peng, C. Y.; Nanayakkara,
A.; Gonzalez, C.; Challacombe, M.; Gill, P. M. W.; Johnson, B.; Chen,
W.; Wong, M. W.; Andres, J. L.; Gonzalez, C.; Head-Gordon, M.; Replogle,
E. S.; Pople, J. A. Gaussian 98, revision A.11; Gaussian, Inc.: Pittsburgh,
PA, 2001.
(85) Gerken, M.; Dixon, D. A.; Schrobilgen, G. J. Inorg. Chem. 2000, 39, 4244.
(86) SMART, version 5.611; Siemens Energy and Automotive Analytical
Instrumentation: Madison, WI, 1999.
(87) SAINT+, version 6.02; Siemens Energy and Automotive Analytical
Instrumentation: Madison, WI, 1999.
(88) Sheldrick, G. M. SADABS (Siemens Area Detector Absorption Corrections),
version 2.03; Bruker AXS, Inc.: Madison, WI, 1999.
(91) Mukherjee, A.; Spiro, T. G. SVIB Program, An Expert System for
Vibrational Analysis; Program 656, Bulletin 15(1); Quantum Chemistry
Program Exchange: Indiana University, 1995.
(89) Sheldrick, G. M. SHELXTL, version 5.1; Siemens Analytical X-ray
Instruments, Inc.: Madison, WI, 1998.
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 127, NO. 26, 2005 9427