Evaluation Only. Created with Aspose.PDF. Copyright 2002-2021 Aspose Pty Ltd.
Samanta et al.
which the methyl and benzoyl groups overlap corresponds to
the highest energy.
Discussion
It is well established that substitution of an electron-donating
group in the benzene ring of an aryl alkyl ketone at an ortho or
para position results in the so-called state switching.9 For
example, the character of the lowest-energy triplet excited state
of unsubstituted â-phenylpropiophenone changes from n,π* to
π,π* upon methoxy substitution as in â-phenyl-p-methoxypro-
piophenone. Thus, the lowest excited triplet state for all the
ketones 1-8 is π,π* (T1) with the n,π* state (T2) being
proximately placed; the latter is populated via thermal equilibra-
tion with the former state. Norrish type I cleavage and â-phenyl
quenching are reactions that occur from triplet states with n,π*
character, which in the case of ketones 1-8 is the T2 state.
Assuming, as in the previous studies, that the thermal equilibra-
tion between the T1 and T2 states2c,6,11,13 is faster compared to
the deactivation processes, the triplet decay rate constant (kT),
which is the inverse of the triplet lifetime, is given by:
kT ) kint + K(kâ + kcleavage
)
(1)
where kint is the intrinsic decay rate constant for the π,π* triplet,
K is the equilibrium constant between T1 and T2, kâ is the rate
constant for â-phenyl quenching, and kcleavage is the rate constant
for the Norrish type I reaction. The value of K may be assumed
to be the same for ketones 1-8 because the chromophore, i.e.,
p-methoxypropiophenone, is the same for all these compounds.
The model compound that may serve for kint is p-methoxypro-
piophenone,6b which has a lifetime of 5.6 µs in acetonitrile and
33 µs in methanol. These lifetimes are more than an order of
magnitude larger than the lifetimes for 1-8, and for this reason,
the intrinsic decay of 1-8 from the T1 state needs not be taken
into account when analyzing the differences in the lifetimes
observed. The low photoreaction quantum yield observed for 1
and â-phenylpropiophenone indicates that the Norrish type I
reactivity cannot compete with â-phenyl quenching. In 4-8,
the only transient observed by laser-flash photolysis is the triplet
state, which shows further that the Norrish type I cleavage does
not occur for these ketones. Therefore, the differences in the
lifetimes for ketones 1-8 must be related to differences in the
efficiencies for â-phenyl quenching.
The â-phenyl quenching involves charge transfer, and the
quenching efficiency can be modulated by changing the donor
ability of the â-phenyl ring3,5 (cf. lifetimes of 1 and 3 in Table
FIGURE 3. UFF-calculated relative energies (kcal/mol) for all
staggered conformers of 1, 2, 4-6, and 8.
1, 2, 4-6, and 8. The objective of these calculations was to
obtain relative energies for the different staggered conforma-
tions. The relative stability of different conformers for the
different ketones, in principle, can be computed ab initio.
However, this was not done in present examples because of
the structural complexity of the ketones and the number of
ketones involved. In addition, past experience shows that force
field calculations do give relative stabilities, albeit qualitatively.5,6b
The full-energy dihedral angle profiles for ketones 2 and 4 show
that the relative order of the energies of the eclipsed conforma-
tions follows that of the energies of the staggered conformations.
For example for compound 2, the conformer with a gauche
interaction between the methyl and benzoyl groups has a higher
energy than the conformer with a gauche interaction between
the phenyl and benzoyl groups. The same effect is observed
for the eclipsed conformations such that the conformation for
(12) Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.; Robb,
M. A.; Cheeseman, J. R.; Montgomery, J. A., Jr.; Vreven, T.; Kudin, K.
N.; Burant, J. C.; Millam, J. M.; Iyengar, S. S.; Tomasi, J.; Barone, V.;
Mennucci, B.; Cossi, M.; Scalmani, G.; Rega, N.; Petersson, G. A.;
Nakatsuji, H.; Hada, M.; Ehara, M.; Toyota, K.; Fukuda, R.; Hasegawa, J.;
Ishida, M.; Nakajima, T.; Honda, Y.; Kitao, O.; Nakai, H.; Klene, M.; Li,
X.; Knox, J. E.; Hratchian, H. P.; Cross, J. B.; Bakken, V.; Adamo, C.;
Jaramillo, J.; Gomperts, R.; Stratmann, R. E.; Yazyev, O.; Austin, A. J.;
Cammi, R.; Pomelli, C.; Ochterski, J. W.; Ayala, P. Y.; Morokuma, K.;
Voth, G. A.; Salvador, P.; Dannenberg, J. J.; Zakrzewski, V. G.; Dapprich,
S.; Daniels, A. D.; Strain, M. C.; Farkas, O.; Malick, D. K.; Rabuck, A.
D.; Raghavachari, K.; Foresman, J. B.; Ortiz, J. V.; Cui, Q.; Baboul, A.
G.; Clifford, S.; Cioslowski, J.; Stefanov, B. B.; Liu, G.; Liashenko, A.;
Piskorz, P.; Komaromi, I.; Martin, R. L.; Fox, D. J.; Keith, T.; Al-Laham,
M. A.; Peng, C. Y.; Nanayakkara, A.; Challacombe, M.; Gill, P. M. W.;
Johnson, B.; Chen, W.; Wong, M. W.; Gonzalez, C.; Pople, J. A. Gaussian
03, revision B.05; Gaussian Inc.: Pittsburgh, PA, 2003.
(13) (a) Wagner, P. J.; Kemppainen, A. E.; Schott, H. N. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1970, 92, 5280. (b) Wagner, P. J.; Nakahira, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1973, 95, 8474.
4456 J. Org. Chem., Vol. 71, No. 12, 2006