Table 2 Catalytic activity: oxidation of cyclohexenea
Product selectivity (%)
Conv. (%)
(TOF)
epoxide
diol
-ol
-one
Catalyst (Si/Ti)
TS-1 (33)b
19.2 (3)
34.2 (7)
93.2 (14)
100 (15)
100 (15)
5.9
12.9
17.3
29.7
96.2
69.3
60.3
33.9
0
9.7
15.1
6.8
14.2
20.3
1.1
Ti-MCM-41 (40)b
Ti-SBA-12 (30)b
Ti-SBA-12 (30)c
Ti-SBA-12 (30)d
20.0
34.6
49.9
2.6
0
a
Fig. 6 Tentative reaction mechanism for the oxidation of cyclohexene
Reaction conditions: catalyst, 0.1 g; cyclohexene, 0.82 g; substrate :
oxidant = 2 : 1.2; acetone, 5 ml; temperature, 333 K; reaction time, 12 h.
over Ti-SBA-12.
b
c
Oxidant = 30% aq. H2O2; solvent = acetone. Oxidant = 5.5 M
d
catalytic activity for oxidation of bulkier molecules. A tentative
reaction mechanism over tetrahedral Ti in titanosilicates is
presented in Fig. 6.
TBHP in decane; solvent = acetonitrile. Oxidant = 5.5 M TBHP in
decane; solvent = dichloromethane. TOF = mol of cyclohexene
converted per mol of titanium per hour.
In conclusion, we report here, for the first time, the synthesis
of framework Ti-substituted Ti-SBA-12 molecular sieves by
controlling the concentration of HCl used in the synthesis.
By an appropriate choice of oxidant and solvent, high
conversions and, importantly, selectivity (495%) in epoxi-
dation reactions of bulky molecules over these catalysts could
be obtained. The mesoporous structure of Ti-SBA-12 enabled
a better accessibility of Ti active sites to bulky substrate
molecules which is reflected in the high conversions of
cyclohexene and cyclooctene and B100% selectivity to the
epoxide over these novel catalysts. Such high selectivities at
high conversions for oxidation of cyclooctene over titano-
silicates have not been reported, so far.8
34.2% were obtained over microporous TS-1 and 2-D
hexagonal mesoporous Ti-MCM-41, respectively (Table 2).
The selectivity for (epoxide + diol) is lower over Ti-SBA-12
(51.2%) than on TS-1 (75.2%). Ti-SBA-12, containing more
tripodal Ti sites (Ti(OH)(OSi)3) than TS-1 (Fig. 3 and 4),
facilitates a radical mechanism and homolytic cleavage of the
O–O bond of reactive oxo-Ti species. A linear correlation was
observed between catalytic activity and the content of frame-
work tetrahedral Ti ions (Fig. 5). The epoxide selectivity also
correlated with the concentration of such Ti sites (estimated
from XRD and UV-visible spectroscopy) (ESI, S4w).
Oxidation reactions were also conducted with 5.5 M tert-
butyl hydroperoxide (TBHP) in decane instead of aqueous
H2O2 as oxidant. A major influence of solvents on product
selectivity was observed (Table 2). Epoxide selectivities of only
29.7% were observed in acetonitrile and acetone solvents.
However, reactions in dichloromethane yielded 100% cyclo-
hexene conversion and 96.2% epoxide selectivity, the highest
so far reported for cyclohexene oxidation over titanosilicate
molecular sieves. Cyclooctene, an even bulkier substrate, was
converted (61.9%) to epoxide with 100% selectivity, over
Ti-SBA-12 (Si/Ti = 30). Under similar conditions, TS-1,
using aq. H2O2 as the oxidant, as expected, exhibited negligible
A. K. acknowledges the Council of Scientific and Industrial
Research (CSIR), New Delhi for the Research Fellowship.
Notes and references
1 (a) J. M. Thomas and G. Sankar, Acc. Chem. Res., 2001, 34, 571;
(b) A. Corma, Chem. Rev., 1997, 97, 237.
2 (a) D. Zhao, Q. Huo, J. Feng, B. F. Chmelka and G. D. Stucky,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1998, 120, 6024; (b) Y. Sakamoto, I. Diaz,
´
O. Terasaki, D. Zhao, J. Perez-Periente, J. M. Kim and
G. D. Stucky, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2002, 106, 3118.
3 (a) S. Wu, Y. Han, Y.-C. Zou, J.-W. Song, L. Zhao, Y. Di,
S.-Z. Liu and F.-S. Xiao, Chem. Mater., 2004, 16, 486;
(b) N. N. Trukhan, V. N. Romannikov, A. N. Shmakov,
M. P. Vanina, E. A. Paukshtis, V. I. Bukhtiyarov,
V. V. Kriventsov, I. Yu. Danilov and O. A. Kholdeeva,
Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 2003, 59, 73; (c) J. A. Melero,
J. M. Arsuaga, P. de Frutos, J. Iglesias, J. Sainz and S. Blazquez,
Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 2005, 86, 364.
4 F. Be
112, 14403.
5 Y. Yue, A. Ge
and J. Fraissard, Chem. Commun., 1999, 1967.
rube, F. Kleitz and S. Kaliaguine, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2008,
´ ´
deon, J.-L. Bonardet, N. Melosh, J.-B. Despinose
´ ´ ´
6 B. L. Newalkar, J. Olanrewaju and S. Komarneni, J. Phys. Chem.
B., 2001, 105, 8356.
7 (a) T. Thangaraj, R. Kumar, S. P. Mirajkar and P. Ratnasamy,
J. Catal., 1991, 130, 1; (b) R. Millini, E. Previde Massara,
G. Perego and G. Bellussi, J. Catal., 1992, 137, 497;
´
(c) M. A. Camblor, A. Corma and J. Perez Periante, Zeolites,
1993, 13, 82.
8 P. Ratnasamy, D. Srinivas and H. Knozinger, Adv. Catal., 2004,
48, 1.
¨
9 D. Srinivas, P. Manikandan, S. C. Laha, R. Kumar and
P. Ratnasamy, J. Catal., 2003, 217, 160.
10 T. Tatsumi, Y. Watanabe, Y. Himasawa and J. Tsuchiya, Res.
Chem. Intermed., 1998, 24, 529.
Fig. 5 Correlation of catalytic activity (cyclohexene conversion) with
variation in molar ratio of Ti, unit cell volume (XRD) and area of
tetrahedral Ti (diffuse reflectance UV-visible spectroscopy).
ꢀc
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2009
6486 | Chem. Commun., 2009, 6484–6486