work out quite well in affording cycloadducts between 4 and
yield. At present, it appears that only certain cyclic dienes
are the useful substrates if one wishes to access 4 + 3
cycloadducts in good to excellent yields.
1
3
various dienes. The results are summarized in Table 2.
The general reaction procedure consisted of treating a 0.2
M solution of 4 in dichloromethane with 10 mol % scandium
triflate in the presence of 2.5 equiv of diene at 0 °C while
warming the reaction to room temperature over the course
of 2 h. With furan this produced the cycloadduct 7 as a single
stereoisomer in 90% yield. With both cyclopentadiene and
cyclohexadiene the yields and stereoselectivities were lower,
perhaps indicative of a stepwise mechanism.14 2,5-Dimeth-
ylfuran afforded a reasonable yield of the cycloadduct 10 as
a single isomer.
Several acyclic dienes were examined as well. The reaction
worked well with butadiene, but led to only the 4 + 2
cycloaddition product 11. A mixture of 4 + 3 and 4 + 2
cycloaddition adducts was observed with 2,3-dimethylbuta-
diene, both in relatively low yields. Isoprene gave only a 4
The mechanism of the reaction of 4 with dienes is not
absolutely clear. The reactions involving 4 + 2 cycloaddi-
tions or 4 + 3 cycloadditions with high levels of simple
diastereoselectivity might be regarded as concerted processes.
On the other hand, the occurrence of stereoisomers as in the
case of cyclopentadiene or the production of mixtures as with
2,3-dimethylbutadiene suggests the possibility of an inter-
mediate which can afford both 4 + 2 and 4 + 3 cycloadducts
or 4 + 3 cyloadducts with eroded diastereoselectivity. Further
work is necessary to distinguish all of the possibilities.
In summary, we have developed a concise route to
2-(silyloxy)acroleins and have demonstrated the successful
4 + 3 and 4 + 2 cycloaddition reaction of one such
compound under mild conditions using catalytic amounts of
a Lewis acid. Broadening the scope of the reaction, finding
an appropriate chiral Lewis acid catalyst, and applying the
process in synthesis constitute our next goals in this area.
+
3 cycloadduct as a mixture of regioisomers, but in low
(
6) Funk, R. L.; Yos, K. J., III. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 2598.
(7) (a) Sasaki, T.; Ishibashi, Y.; Ohno, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1982, 23,
1
6
693. (b) Blackburn, C.; Childs, R. F.; Kennedy, R. A. Can. J. Chem. 1983,
1, 1981.
Acknowledgment. This work was supported by the
Petroleum Research Fund, administered by the American
Chemical Society. We thank the National Science Foundation
for partial support of the NMR (PCM-8115599) facility at
the University of MissourisColumbia and for partial funding
for the purchase of a 500 MHz spectrometer (CHE-89-
08304).
(8) (a) Santelli, M.; Pons, J.-M. Lewis Acids and SelectiVity in Organic
Synthesis; CRC: Boca Raton, 1996. (b) Lewis Acid Reagents. A Practical
Approach; Yaammoto, H., Ed.; Oxford University: Oxford, 1999.
9) M u¨ ller, S. N.; Batra, R.; Senn, M.; Giese, B.; Kisel, M.; Shadyro, O.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 2795.
10) However, treatment of ketone 3 with TMSCl, triethylamine, and
DMAP in refluxing dichloromethane gave the corresponding TMS enol
ether.
(
(
(11) For a review of TADDOL Lewis acids and their applications, see:
Gawronski, J.; Gawronska, K. Tartaric and Malic Acids in Synthesis;
Wiley: New York, 1999; Chapter 12.
Supporting Information Available: General procedures
for the synthesis of 4 and its cycloaddition reaction with
dienes and copies of proton and carbon spectra of 4-14.
This material is available free of charge via the Internet at
http://pubs.acs.org.
(
12) Kobayashi, S. In Lanthanides: Chemistry and Use in Synthesis;
Kobayashi, S., Ed.; Springer, 1999; pp 64-118.
13) Dienes which did not afford good yields of cycloadducts upon
reaction with 4 in the presence of scandium triflate: N-carbomethoxypyrrole,
-methoxyfuran, 2-methylfuran, and 1,3-cycloheptadiene.
14) (a) Cramer, C. J.; Barrows, S. E. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 5523. (b)
Cramer, C. J.; Barrows, S. E. J. Phys. Org. Chem. 2000, 13, 176.
(
2
(
OL006281X
Org. Lett., Vol. 2, No. 17, 2000
2705