Iodination of Acetone in Isobutyric Acid + Water
J. Phys. Chem. A, Vol. 114, No. 1, 2010 359
judging the existence of a critical slowing down effect. The six lowest
temperature points, which are plotted as diamonds in Figure 3, illustrate
the magnitude of the critical effect. According to Table 1, these low
temperature points define a critical region extending about 1.3 °C above
the initial critical temperature at 25.43 °C or about 1.9 °C above the
critical end point temperature at 24.83 °C. Because the tempera-
ture in Figure 1 is 25.43 °C, which is just 0.60 °C above the
temperature of the critical end point, it is clear that the zeroth-order
kinetic rate law is preserved well into the critical region.
slowing down effect is anything other than the influence of the
critical point on the rate of the chemical reaction.
A comparison of Figures 1 and 2 reveals that the familiar zeroth-
order rate law25 persists both inside and outside the critical region.
This preservation of kinetic order was noted previously in the case of
the pseudo-first-order Menschutkin reaction of benzylbromide with
21
triethylamine near the LCST of triethylamine + water. Taken
together, the Menschutkin reaction and the iodination of acetone
reaction suggest that reaction mechanisms are unaffected by the
Equation 19 indicates that the critical behavior of kobs depends
upon the temperature dependence of the thermodynamic derivative
presence of the critical point. This observation confirms the frequently
made assumption3
8-43
that those factors in the rate law which depend
(
∂∆G
2
/∂ꢀ
2
)
e
evaluated at the critical end point, which is reached at
/∂ꢀ is
explicitly upon the details of the mechanism such as the combination,
(K HA, in eq 19, are unaffected by criticality and remain
smooth functions of the temperature through the critical region.
chemical equilibrium. The critical behavior of (∂∆G
2
2 e
)
1
k
2
2
′/γ *)aAca
determined by a count of the number of fixed density variables.
We begin this enumeration by adding eqs 10 to obtain the
stoichiometry of the overall reaction
References and Notes
(
1) Kondepudi, D.; Prigogine, I. Modern Thermodynamics; John Wiley:
New York, 1998; Chapter 13.
2) Griffiths, R. B.; Wheeler, J. C. Phys. ReV. A 1970, 2, 1047.
(3) Kumar, A.; Krishnamurthy, H. R.; Gopal, E. S. R. Phys. Rep. 1983,
8, 57.
(
-
-
-
Αc + Α + Ι f ΑcΙ + ΗΑ + 2Ι
(21)
3
9
(
(
(
4) Fisher, M. E. ReV. Mod. Phys. 1998, 70, 653.
5) Stanley, H. E. ReV. Mod. Phys. 1999, 71, S358.
Equations 9 and 21 include all of the starting materials with the
exception of water. Although water is not part of either eqs 9 and
6) Kadanoff, L. P.; Gotze, W.; Hamblen, D.; Hecht, R.; Lewis,
E. A. S.; Palciauskas, V. V.; Rayl, M.; Swift, J.; Aspnes, D.; Kane, ReV.
2
1, it participates with isobutyric acid in the Bronsted-Lowry acid/
Mod. Phys. 1967, 39, 395.
base equilibrium
(7) Fisher, M. E. Rep. Prog. Phys. 1967, 30, 615.
(
8) Anisimov, M. A.; Voronel, A. V.; Gorodetskii, E. E. SoV. Phys.
JETP 1971, 33, 605.
+
-
(9) Wilson, K. G. ReV. Mod. Phys. 1983, 55, 583.
ΗΑ + Η ꢀ f Η ꢀ + Α
(22)
2
3
(10) Greer, S. C.; Moldover, M. R. Annu. ReV. Phys. Chem. 1981, 32, 233.
(
11) Sengers, J. V.; Levelt-Sengers, J. M. H. Annu. ReV. Phys. Chem.
1
1
5
986, 37, 189.
35
Wheeler has pointed out that the total mass of water represented
(12) Procaccia, I.; Gitterman, M. Phys. ReV. A 1982, 25, 1137.
+
(13) Kim, Y. W.; Baird, J. K. J. Phys. Chem. A 2005, 109, 4750.
3 2
by the sum of H O and H O is conserved by eq 22. As a
(
14) Muller, C.; Steiger, A.; Becker, F. Thermochim. Acta 1989, 151,
31.
(15) Snyder, R. B.; Eckert, C. A. AIChE J. 1973, 19, 1126.
consequence, the composition of the mixture of isobutyric acid +
water is uniquely determined by specifying the mass fraction, w,
of water; hence, one density variable is held fixed. This view is
consistent with the experimental behavior of the isobaric heat
(
(
16) Baird, J. K.; Clunie, J. C. J. Phys. Chem. A 1998, 102, 6498.
17) Clunie, J. C.; Baird, J. K. Fluid Phase Equilib. 1998, 150-151,
49.
capacity, CP,w ) T(∂S/∂T)P,w, which in the case of both acidic36
(18) Kim, Y. W.; Baird, J. K. Int. J. Thermophys. 2001, 22, 1449.
(19) Kim, Y. W.; Baird, J. K. J. Phys. Chem. A 2003, 107, 8435.
and basic37 binary liquid mixtures has been observed to diverge
(
(
20) Kim, Y. W.; Baird, J. K. Int. J. Thermophys. 2004, 25, 1025.
21) Specker, C. D.; Ellis, J. M.; Baird, J. K. Int. J. Thermophys. 2007,
weakly as a function of temperature in the critical region. Here, S
is the entropy, which is a density.
2
8, 846.
35
Applying Wheeler’s criterion to the case of the iodination of
acetone in isobutyric acid + water, the amount of water in the
mixture should be considered fixed, making water an inert
component. The state of the system is then described by one fixed
(22) Morrison, G. Phys. ReV. A 1984, 30, 644.
(
(
(
23) Kim, Y. W.; Baird, J. K. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 17262.
24) Lapworth, A. J. Chem. Soc. 1904, 85, 30.
25) Morrison, R. T. and Boyd, R. N. Organic Chemistry, 5th ed.; Allyn
and Bacon, Inc.: Boston, MA, 1987; pp 912-913.
(26) Haase, R. Z. Phys. Chem. (Muenchen, Ger.) 1987, 153, 217.
(27) Pekar, M. Progress in Reaction Kinetics and Mechanism 2005, 30, 3.
(28) Peters, D. G.; Hayes, J. M.; Hieftje, G. M. Chemical Separations
2 2 e
density variable, and (∂∆G /∂ꢀ ) should go to zero weakly as T
f T , where T is the temperature of the critical end point. In this
c
c
view, the slowing down effect shown in Figure 3 can be considered
to be a weak critical effect.
and Measurements; W. B. Saunders Co.: Philadelphia, PA, 1974; p 322.
(29) Baird, J. K.; Kim, Y. W. Mol. Phys. 2002, 100, 1855.
(
(
30) Stein, A.; Allen, G. F. J. Chem. Phys. 1973, 59, 6079.
In deriving eq 19, we have adopted the point of view of
homogeneous kinetics in the sense that the concentrations of reactants,
products, and intermediates are not considered to vary in space.3
Spatially nonuniform concentrations appear in the theory of dynamic
31) Hales, B. J.; Bertrand, G. L.; Hepler, L. G. J. Phys. Chem. 1966,
7
0, 3970.
8-40
(32) Jacobs, D. T. J. Chem. Phys. 1989, 91, 560.
(
(
(
33) Toumi, A.; Bouanz, M.; Gharbi, A. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2002, 362, 567.
34) Griffiths, R. B. J. Chem. Phys. 1974, 60, 195.
4
1-43
critical phenomena when the couplings among reaction,
diffu-
35) Wheeler, J. C. Phys. ReV. A 1984, 30, 648.
41-43
41-43
41,42
sion,
heat conduction,
and sound propagation
are taken
(36) Klein, H.; Woermann, D. Ber. Bunsen-Ges. Phys. Chem. 1975, 79, 1180.
(37) Flewelling, A. C.; DeFonseka, R. J.; Khaleeli, N.; Partee, J.; Jakobs,
into account. These so-called mode couplings contain the possibility
42
D. T. J. Chem. Phys. 1996, 104, 8048.
of slowing down as well as speeding up.
(
38) Patashinskii, A. Z.; Pokrovskii, V. L.; Feigel’man, M. V. SoV. Phys.
JETP 1982, 55, 851.
5
. Conclusions
(39) Baird, J. K. J. Chem. Educ. 1999, 76, 1146.
(
40) Baird, J. K.; Kim, Y. W. J. Phys. Chem. A 2003, 107, 10241.
The iodination of acetone in isobutyric acid + water is the first
psueudo-zeroth-order reaction to exhibit critical slowing down. The
(41) Gitterman, M. J. Stat. Phys. 1990, 58, 707.
(42) Gitterman, M. Physica A 2009, 388, 1046.
(
43) Milner, S. T.; Martin, P. C. Phys. ReV. A 1986, 33, 1996.
use of the aliquot method in the analysis of the triiodide concentra-
22
tion would seem to remove the possibility that the cause of this
JP908402T