Communication
ChemComm
between the junctions decreases (see above) and consequently Notes and references
the twist angle F between adjacent rod-like cores along the
column segments increases (Table 1 and Fig. S4, ESI†). A twist
angle between the molecules in adjacent rafts of 8.2–8.61 is the Im3m * phase was also induced between the la
[ ]
‡
A phase sequence la3%d–Im3m * –la3%d with increasing terminal alkyl
11 12
chains length was observed for the ANBCs and BABHs. For the latter
[
]
3
%d phases of
18
different homologues.
found in the la3%d phases. If the twist angle exceeds this value
[
]
the gyroid is replaced by the Im3m * structure. However, the
la3%d lattice appears again upon further chain volume enlarge-
1 H. K. Bisoyi, T. J. Bunning and Q. Li, Adv. Mater., 2018, 30, 1706512;
B. Chang, X. Li and T. Sun, Eur. Polym. J., 2019, 118, 365; Y. Sang,
J. Han, T. Zhao, P. Duan and M. Liu, Adv. Mater., 2019, 1900110.
(a) C. Tschierske, Liq. Cryst., 2018, 45, 2221; (b) C. Tschierske and
G. Ungar, ChemPhysChem, 2016, 17, 9.
ment, as for example observed in the series of cyclic com-
pounds 2/cn. The calculated twist angle is 9.51 in the re-entrant
la3%d phase of 2/c12 and an even larger value of 10.11 is calculated
2
3
K. V. Le, H. Takezoe and F. Araoka, Adv. Mater., 2017, 1602737.
[
]
4 (a) C. Dressel, F. Liu, M. Prehm, X. B. Zeng, G. Ungar and C. Tschierske,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2014, 53, 13115; (b) M. Alaasar, S. Poppe, Q. Dong,
F. Liu and C. Tschierske, Chem. Commun., 2016, 52, 13869.
(a) T. Kajitani, S. Kohmoto, M. Yamamoto and K. Kishikawa, Chem.
Mater., 2005, 17, 3812; J. M. Wolska, J. Wilk, D. Pociecha,
J. Mieczkowski and E. Gorecka, Chem. – Eur. J., 2017, 23, 6853;
(b) H. R. Brand and H. Pleiner, Eur. Phys. J. E: Soft Matter Biol. Phys.,
for the la3%d phase of 5/Et (Table 1). Hence, the chiral Im3m *
3
phase becomes the thermodynamically more stable alternative
mode of self-assembly replacing the achiral double gyroid if the
intermolecular twist exceeds 8.61. However, this structure
appears to be even more sensitive to the twist angle change
and becomes the less stable structure as the twist in the
competing la3%d phase reaches 9.51. This is a generally observed
5
2019, 42, 142.
6
(a) C. Dressel, T. Reppe, M. Prehm, M. Brautzsch and C. Tschierske,
Nat. Chem., 2014, 6, 971; (b) C. Dressel, W. Weissflog and
C. Tschierske, Chem. Commun., 2015, 51, 15850; (c) M. Alaasar,
M. Prehm, Y. Cao, F. Liu and C. Tschierske, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.,
016, 55, 312; M. Alaasar, S. Poppe, Q. Dong, F. Liu and
C. Tschierske, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2017, 56, 10801.
7 T. Kato, J. Uchida, T. Ichikawa and T. Sakamoto, Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed., 2018, 57, 4355.
Bicontinuous Liquid Crystals, ed. M. L. Lynch and P. T. Spicer, CRC
Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, FL, 2005; L. van‘t Hag,
S. L. Gras, C. E. Conn and C. J. Drummond, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2017,
[
]
feature‡ and any new or modified model of the Im3m * phase
has to give a convincing explanation of this observation.
2
Overall, a new design concept of robust thermotropic Cubbi
phase forming materials, based on tricatenar compounds with
a cycloaliphatic apex is introduced, providing a tool for stabiliz-
ing Cubbi phases over broad temperature ranges. In this respect
these compounds are advantageous over related compounds
with linear or branched alkyl chains at the apex. It also allows
8
46, 2705.
[
]
9 (a) G. Ungar, F. Liu and X. B. Zeng, in Handbook of Liquid Crystals,
ed. J. W. Goodby, P. J. Collings, T. Kato, C. Tschierske, H. Gleeson
and P. Raynes, Wiley-VCH, 2nd edn, 2014, vol. 5; (b) S. Kutsumizu,
Isr. J. Chem., 2012, 52, 844; (c) M. Yoneya, Chem. Rec., 2011, 11, 66.
0 C. Tschierske, J. Mater. Chem., 2001, 11, 2647.
1 G. W. Gray, B. Jones and F. Marson, J. Chem. Soc., 1957, 393;
S. Kutsumizu, K. Morita, T. Ichikawa, S. Yano, S. Nojima and
T. Yamaguchi, Liq. Cryst., 2002, 29, 1447.
the engineering of the cubic phase type (la3%d vs. Im3m * ) and
hence the control of emergence of supermolecular chirality.
The remarkable re-entrance of the la3%d phase is not yet fully
1
1
understood. However, it appears that for a twist angle in the
[
]
range between 8.6 and 9.51 the chiral Im3m * phase becomes
the thermodynamically more stable alternative structure with
respect to the achiral double gyroid (la3%d), irrespectively if it is
1
2 (a) H. Schubert, J. Hauschild, D. Demus and S. Hoffmann, Z. Chem.,
1
978, 18, 256; (b) Y. Yamamura, Y. Nakazawa, S. Kutsumizu and
formed by a single compound or in mixtures of compounds
with different apex size. This observation is difficult to explain
with the presently existing models of the cubic ‘‘Im3m’’
K. Saito, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2019, 21, 32705.
3 H. T. Nguyen, C. Destrade and J. Malthete, Adv. Mater., 1997, 9, 375;
D. W. Bruce, Acc. Chem. Res., 2000, 33, 831.
4 A. M. Levelut and M. Clerc, Liq. Cryst., 1998, 24, 105.
15 X. B. Zeng, G. Ungar and M. Imperor-Clerc, Nat. Mater., 2005, 4, 562.
1
1
1
5,16
phase
and requires a further refinement of these models.
1
1
1
6 K. Saito, Y. Yamamura, Y. Miwa and S. Kutsumizu, Phys. Chem.
Chem. Phys., 2016, 18, 3280.
7 H. J. Lu, X. B. Zeng, G. Ungar, C. Dressel and C. Tschierske, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 2018, 57, 2835.
8 S. Kutsumizu, S. Miisako, Y. Miwa, M. Kitagawa, Y. Yamamura and
K. Saito, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2016, 18, 17341.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts to declare.
Chem. Commun.
This journal is ©The Royal Society of Chemistry 2019